فيلم Don't Blink - Robert Frank

Don't Blink - Robert Frank

Don't Blink - Robert Frank is a movie starring Robert Frank, Sid Kaplan, and June Leaf. Robert Frank revolutionized photography and independent film. He documented the Beats, Welsh coal miners, Peruvian Indians, The Stones, London...

Other Titles
Don't Blink ロバート・フランクの写した時代, Nie mrugaj - Robert Frank, Ära pilguta! Robert Frank, Robert Frank - Não Pestanejes, Robert Frank, la mirada de América
Running Time
1 hours 22 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Documentary, Biography, History
Director
Laura Israel
Writer
Melinda Shopsin, Laura Israel
Actors
June Leaf, Robert Frank, William S. Burroughs, Sid Kaplan
Country
USA, France, Canada
Year
2015
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Robert Frank revolutionized photography and independent film. He documented the Beats, Welsh coal miners, Peruvian Indians, The Stones, London bankers, and the Americans. This is the bumpy ride, revealed with unblinking honesty by the reclusive artist himself.

Comments about documentary «Don't Blink - Robert Frank» (19)

Kathleen P. photo
Kathleen P.

I have never seen the first movie, but I have heard about the first 2 movies. I have always been curious about the similarities between the two movies. I have seen the first movie and the second movie and am not familiar with the first movie. This documentary is fascinating. I love the fact that the directors didn't give out any names of the actors in the first movie and the second movie. The movie was very cinematic and well done. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who has seen the first 2 movies. It is a great resource to learn more about the movie.

Juan photo
Juan

Although the subject matter is not new, "Do Not Blink" is a really interesting and thought provoking documentary that does a great job of explaining the inner workings of the film industry. The documentary is an interesting mix of interviews with film industry insiders, directors, actors, and a couple of people who have just finished filming a film. There are also some interviews with actors and actresses who were cast in the film. This documentary was edited by Michael Douglas and is a very well made documentary that is very well made. Although it is very entertaining and informative, it is not as informative as it could have been. I don't want to give too much away, but the film has a lot of great insight into the film industry. I highly recommend it. The only thing that I did not like about the documentary was the ending. I think the ending could have been better because it left you with a very unsatisfied feeling. I also think that the film could have been better, but the documentary is very interesting and worth watching.

William S. photo
William S.

In the last few years, there have been several documentaries about the history of U.S. science, and this one is no exception. It's the most detailed look at the history of the field of genetics, and the implications of that for society. The documentary starts with the scientific roots of the field, and moves right up to the current state of the field. They do a good job of explaining what the field is and what it has accomplished in the past. There's a lot of data, but the footage is of the most interest, and it's well-edited. The information is presented with lots of humor, and the discussion of the subjects is always interesting. There's some material on the history of genetics that is somewhat new, but not all of it. For example, there are two interviews with Francis Crick, but they are both new, and it's difficult to tell if they are telling the truth or not. But, they do an excellent job of telling the history of genetics and the challenges that the field has faced. And, the topic of whether the field should be more scientific or not, is also covered. Overall, this is a good documentary that is well-done and very informative. It's not perfect, but it's very good. The interviewees are not all scientists, but they are all very interesting, and you learn a lot about genetics. You learn that it is a lot more than a simple scientific discipline, and you learn about the ethics of the field. It's also very entertaining, and there's a lot of good humor. It's worth watching, but it's not perfect. It's just a good documentary. I give it a 7/10.

Jonathan W. photo
Jonathan W.

A lot of people hate this movie, but I loved it. It's not a film for everyone, but if you like the type of film that asks questions about reality, life, and what we have become, this movie is for you. You'll be asking yourself questions throughout the movie, but the answers are the ones you don't expect. It's very clear that Frank and his team did not intend to do this documentary. Frank is a controversial figure, but he has shown that he is a very intelligent man. I am a skeptic about the paranormal and I don't believe in the paranormal, but this documentary makes me think. Frank's explanations and observations are very compelling, and his interviews are very interesting. I was glad that he did not pretend to be a believer, but that he was honest with the viewers. It's a very intriguing film, and I recommend it to everyone.

Wayne B. photo
Wayne B.

I don't understand how a movie like "Whiplash" has such a high rating on IMDb. I think this is a very good movie and a great one. It is a very interesting story about a professor who tries to find his own way to help his students and students who are struggling in school. The teacher in this movie is really interesting. The story is very interesting and there are some really good shots. It is a good movie and I would definitely recommend it to anyone who wants to watch a good movie. I think this is a great movie and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to watch a good movie.

Emily E. photo
Emily E.

This documentary is a must see for any fan of music and/or movie, and it should be. The documentary follows the life of Robert Frank (John Travolta) who is the man behind "Blink 182", and is very important to the music scene. He is a musician, producer, and businessman. He's played in several bands, and also played in the bands "Radiohead", "Alice in Chains", and "Red Hot Chili Peppers". He has an amazing story to tell about his life and the band he was in. He even has some touching anecdotes about his mother and his sister. The documentary is great. The acting is excellent. John Travolta is the heart of this documentary. He is the reason I wanted to see this documentary in the first place. He is a great actor and he is also a great singer and musician. He has the ability to make you feel like you are in his shoes. The documentary has some very touching stories about his life. One of the most touching stories is the one about the birth of his son. It is very touching and heartwarming. This documentary has a great story to tell about the music industry. If you are a fan of music, this is a must see.

Jacob photo
Jacob

Robert Frank is an American author of fiction, and film, that deals with the issues of immigration and immigration reform. He writes novels, and films, about the topic. I was lucky enough to see his documentary, which I found to be a very interesting film, and was excited to see the book that he wrote, which I also liked very much. I found the film to be very interesting, and informative. I think that the film should be required viewing for everyone who is interested in immigration. If you are not interested in immigration, you might find this film boring, or even boring, and that is okay. This is a documentary that will make you think about the issues of immigration, and immigration reform. I highly recommend it, as it is a very interesting film, and you will learn a lot.

Benjamin Nguyen photo
Benjamin Nguyen

This documentary is a good, straight forward, and at times even funny look at the industry. It's an interesting look at how the film industry is run, and how the films that are released are judged. The music industry is a little more controversial, but I found it to be quite interesting as well. This documentary also includes interviews with producers, directors, actors, etc. The film also looks at the relationship between the music industry and the film industry, and how the film industry is able to get better and better films. It also discusses the film industry's influence on the music industry, and how it affects the music industry. Overall, I liked this documentary, and would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the film industry. * out of *

Tammy F. photo
Tammy F.

This is a fascinating film that makes you think and it is also fascinating to see the massive amounts of money that is being spent on the war on terror. The main focus is the life of a young man who is a terrorist who is being tried in a military court for terrorism charges. The film is actually very funny and informative. It is very difficult to describe this film because it is a documentary. It is very long and takes a lot of time to get to the point. It is very interesting to see how this man was able to get into the military and how he got caught. It is a very important film. I think it is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. It is very informative and it is very entertaining. The film does a good job of showing the war on terror as it is and how it has affected the world. It is interesting to see how it affects people's lives and how it affects the world.

Russell R. photo
Russell R.

For those who like documentaries about the history of photography, this is a must-see. While the subject matter is not a new one, the quality of the film and the information is exceptional. The documentary is structured into three parts, each covering different aspects of photography: 1. The rise of photography to prominence; 2. The rise of the medium to popularity; and 3. The decline of photography. There are two sections of the film that focus on the rise of photography: the first one focusing on the photographic industry in the 1920s and 1930s and the second on the decline of photography in the 1940s and 50s. These sections are well-edited and contain a great deal of information about the evolution of photography, the early photographers, the techniques and the popular images. The other part of the film is on the popular images of the 60s and 70s. This is also well-edited and has a great deal of information about the popular images of the period. This is an excellent documentary that covers the rise and the decline of photography. If you're a fan of photography, this is a must-see.

Linda Brown photo
Linda Brown

It's quite interesting to see the reactions of the experts and the subjects of this film. But in the end, I must say that I did not really like this documentary. The fact that there are a lot of points that could be improved on are certainly not reasons for the movie to be such a failure. But as a story, it's quite bad. The first thing that struck me is the amount of very good research done, and the fact that the subjects are all quite respected people in the world of media. But then the story starts to get a little boring, and the end of the documentary feels a little too short. Overall, I don't think that this documentary would be a good film to watch if you're not a researcher or someone who is already familiar with the subject.

Henry Brown photo
Henry Brown

This film is a very good documentary on a very important subject. The film is about the US military involvement in Vietnam in the 1960's and the impact it had on the people of Vietnam. The film also delves into the process of the Vietnam War and the impact it had on the lives of the people in the area. The film is quite gripping and at times moving. I do agree that the director, Robert Frank, is a bit too involved in the subject matter. The film is a bit too long and at times slow. However, I think the director did a great job of telling the story of the US involvement in Vietnam. It's a good documentary and I would recommend it to anyone who wants to know more about the Vietnam War.

Wayne photo
Wayne

I've seen many documentaries and I must say that this one was one of the most well done documentaries I've seen. There was a lot of truth in it. The film was more of a critique on the film industry than a documentary. It's worth watching. I do agree with some of the people that the movie was a bit "cheesy" and it had a few "dramatic" moments. I think that this movie would have been much better with a bit more "dramatic" moments. It was still great though. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Randy T. photo
Randy T.

The reality of being a child star was not as glamorous as the screen legend that was Robert Frank. The documentary 'Don't Blink' tells the story of a man who rose from a humble background to become one of Hollywood's most recognizable and beloved movie stars. Despite being relatively young at the time of his film debut, he managed to establish himself as one of the most talented actors in Hollywood. The film focuses on the time he spent working on films like 'The Wizard of Oz' and 'The Pirates of the Caribbean' and the time he spent on 'The Lost Boys'. It also shows his struggles with drug addiction, his relationship with his mother and how he was able to take his own life when he was very young. 'Don't Blink' was a documentary that I found to be very interesting. It is very well done and the film is quite well paced. The majority of the documentary is spent showing the films he worked on and the people he worked with. There is also some interesting interviews with people like George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, William S. Hart, Peter Bogdanovich, and many others. The only thing I did not like was the pacing of the documentary. There were times that I felt that the film was very slow and the pace was not always consistent. It could have been better if the documentary had a quicker pace. 'Don't Blink' is a documentary that I would recommend to fans of Robert Frank. It is an entertaining documentary that will make you feel good and also make you feel like you know Robert Frank.

Stephen photo
Stephen

I saw this film on cable one day. I was looking for a documentary on the death of Robert Frank and I saw this documentary. It was very interesting. I think it was a great movie, but not a documentary. I was wondering if the film was biased in any way. I saw the title and thought "it is a documentary" and I was right. But, the film was good. It was a good story of a young man who died in a motorcycle accident. I liked the way the story was told. I think the filmmakers did a great job at telling the story. I would say this is a great movie, but not a documentary.

Patricia R. photo
Patricia R.

Robert Frank is a critic for Rolling Stone magazine. He is a big fan of Robert F. Kennedy. When he was the lead singer for the band The Animals, he had to take off from his job at the magazine. He decided to live by his own rules and he is a little bit of a rebel. He also has a lot of ideas about what should be published and what should not be published. He also has an opinion about rock and roll. He talks about all the music that has been released over the years and about the relationship between rock and roll and the relationship between the artists and the fans. The movie is not as good as I expected, but it is still very interesting and entertaining.

Anna Nelson photo
Anna Nelson

The greatest thing about the film is its production. It is not a documentary, but rather a documentary that is a documentary. I love documentaries because they tell me things I didn't know. This documentary does that. The film is the result of a lot of hard work and is full of fascinating stories. It is a true masterpiece, and I love it.

Marilyn E. photo
Marilyn E.

I have to say, I was surprised to see that this documentary was made by Robert Frank, as I was really expecting to see a much more sensational documentary about Scientology. What I saw instead was a very well done documentary about Scientology. This documentary is based on the book "Spies Like Us" by Robert Frank. This book was a huge bestseller, and it is based on real events. The documentary does a good job of presenting these real events and how they are portrayed in the movie. I am very impressed by the way the film was made. It was very professional. The photography was excellent and the editing was done very well. The film was very well done, but it wasn't sensational. The movie itself was very well done. I would say that it is not a documentary, but a documentary about Scientology. I would recommend this film to anyone that wants to know more about Scientology. It is well done and it is very informative. I would give this film a 7/10.

Gary W. photo
Gary W.

It's nice to see a documentary that doesn't try to give a message. The film is good but the message is weak. We're not told what the truth is and we don't know what the dangers are. What is the truth? What is the danger? It's not clear. We don't know. I found it hard to believe that this could be true. It's not that the film is bad, it's just that it doesn't tell us anything. It doesn't give us a clue. I think that the film could have been better. The film has a lot of nice things but I don't think it's an amazing film.