فيلم Little Women

Little Women

Little Women is a movie starring Sarah Davenport, Lea Thompson, and Allie Jennings. A modern retelling of Louisa May Alcott's classic novel, we follow the lives of four sisters - Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy March - detailing their...

Other Titles
若草物語, Vier Schwestern, Małe kobietki, Jovens Mulheres
Running Time
1 hours 52 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Family, Drama
Clare Niederpruem
Clare Niederpruem, Kristi Shimek, Louisa May Alcott
Allie Jennings, Sarah Davenport, Lea Thompson, Melanie Stone
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A modern retelling of Louisa May Alcott's classic novel, we follow the lives of four sisters - Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy March - detailing their passage from childhood to womanhood. Despite harsh times, they cling to optimism, and as they mature, they face blossoming ambitions and relationships, as well as tragedy, while maintaining their unbreakable bond as sisters.

Comments about family «Little Women» (23)

Julie photo

I liked the film for the most part. I really liked the ending. It gave the film some much needed "closure". It was unexpected, but it was a good ending. There are some flaws in the film. But it is worth watching. I also thought that it was slow at times. But it wasn't that slow. It's not like any other film that is just about things happening for no reason. I have seen some reviews that didn't like the ending because it didn't have a happy ending. I don't think that it had one. It was one of those movies that you don't want to end, but you just have to watch the film. You can't help but think about what you will do in the future. You just have to watch the film. The acting was good. I liked the characters. I think it was good that they didn't show too much about the film. You can just watch the film and be happy for the ending. I liked the ending because it was unexpected, but it was good. Overall, I give it a 7.6/10.

David Harrison photo
David Harrison

I had no idea who Claire Bloom was in "Whispering Cough," and she was simply never mentioned. In "Whispering Cough," she is so interesting that I would be willing to see anything. She has a big, deep voice, but she's so gentle and likable that I was happy to watch her story unfold. I was very impressed by Claire Bloom. I was thinking I'd never get around to seeing a movie with her, but after watching "Whispering Cough," I'm glad I'm watching a movie with her. Her performance is simply outstanding. She really gives her character a soul and a soulful voice. She's not just another teen in a rich family. Claire Bloom was an absolute force to be reckoned with in this movie. She had such an impact on my whole viewing experience. Her story is a great one. I've seen it twice already, and I'm just going to see it again.

Julia Murray photo
Julia Murray

I'm a fan of the novel and would have liked to have seen more of it. I liked the direction of the movie, but the plot and story felt thin. If you haven't read the book, the movie doesn't explain enough. I'm not sure if this is a problem for those who haven't read the book, but for those who have, I'm sure you'll be frustrated by the missing details. It doesn't do anything to help you make sense of the story, or the emotions. Some of the shots were good, but I think the movie could have done a lot better. I think a lot of people will miss the point of the movie. It's not to take away from the book, it's just that the movie does a good job of telling the story. It's a little longer than it needs to be, but that's the best you can do for a short movie. I also think there could have been more of the magic and symbolism in the movie. If you read the book, you'll know that there is a lot of symbolism. I would have liked to see more of that, but this is a good movie. The cast is great. The cinematography is good, and the acting is good. I don't think it's better than the book, but I'd watch it again.

Andrew G. photo
Andrew G.

I did not know what to expect with this film, because I thought the book was so much better. However, I was pleasantly surprised. There were many parts of this film that made me feel I was in a small town in the Midwest. I can understand why some people may not like this film, but for me, it was wonderful. I felt that my heart had been lifted when the credits began to roll. I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys a good story about family and growing up. It is definitely worth seeing!

Craig G. photo
Craig G.

I liked this movie. It was visually beautiful and the characters were interesting. It was true to the book, but had a few twists. It was not as good as the first one, but it was good. I would like to see it again. I have not seen the first one, but I have heard good things about it. There is a lot of fantasy in this movie, but it is not so much fantasy that I was disappointed. I think the people that really enjoyed this movie the most was the little girls. I think it was pretty interesting for them to see the movie. I would not recommend it to little kids.

Jane G. photo
Jane G.

This is the second one from the same director (not a coincidence) and it is a pretty good movie. I would recommend it for a chick flick night. Don't expect too much though, and it will be a great date movie. Go see it!

Kyle S. photo
Kyle S.

The film "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas" is about a young girl, played by Catherine Zeta Jones, who suffers a vision and experiences various sensations. The movie is well acted, with a lot of comedic moments. The plot is a bit complicated but there are many unexpected events that happens. The movie also contains some great effects and a good storyline. Some parts of the film are quite unbelievable but that is the whole point of the film. The boy in the striped pajamas is an American boy, played by Jude Law, who lives with his mom and step-dad. The boy is a shy kid, who is troubled by his fear of people and by his feelings of loneliness. The film is a bit confusing at first but it becomes clearer as the movie goes on. The movie is very enjoyable and I recommend it.

Nathan Chavez photo
Nathan Chavez

In a special two part episode of the BBC TV series "Vicar of Dibley" the family of the Vicar of Dibley in Buckinghamshire are shown, including the youngest daughter, Julia, her mother, Jenny and her uncle, Thomas. The two sets of children are brought up in separate homes. There is a strong emphasis on the brother, Tom, in particular. I don't think it's necessary to mention that the brother was a prisoner for five years at Derry (which in fact was an example of a mild-mannered county). He was subsequently sentenced to a long prison term for his role in the attempted rape of a schoolgirl. He was released in the early 1980s. On his release he is kept in a workhouse. The eldest son, Tim, is not mentioned. However, in later life he would go on to write the excellent book 'The Last Ranger' about a similar episode in the life of a British man who is exiled from the British Isles. The main character in this episode is the oldest daughter, Julia. She's a very lively, lively and clever girl. The older brother, Tom, seems not to have the same capacity for natural emotion as his younger brother. Julia is an almost precocious child. She is shown acting very young in 'The Ghost of Christmas Past' and a series of articles in The Sun newspaper, and later in 'House of Cards'. The title 'A Christmas Carol' is a poor translation. It is not a novel but a poem written in the early 17th century, as a form of instruction to children. The poem is about Christmas and it is an allusion to the Star Spangled Banner and to the seasons. The poem is in Italian, but it is in English. The film is called 'Vicar of Dibley' and it's subtitled 'The Last Ranger'. This is a bit of a misnomer. This is not a war story. It's a family drama. However, it's very much like a mini-series and I enjoyed it very much. There are some beautiful scenes of the countryside, and especially of England. I recommend it.

Julia Schultz photo
Julia Schultz

This is a movie that I can easily recommend to my family, as it is a family film, but not a family movie that I would watch regularly. This is a film that I would be happy to watch again on a Sunday afternoon when my kids were away, but I would not watch again over a weekend with my wife and kids. In my opinion, this is a film that could have been better if it had been made for a wider audience. This is a movie that I feel that could have been better if the audience was younger and younger. The story is just about as interesting as I could have hoped for. It's not a really deep story, but the characters were likable enough that I did not feel that I was missing out on anything by not watching the film.

Patrick photo

The movie "Mona Lisa Smile" is about a blind woman (Anne Bancroft) who moves into a big old house that has been abandoned by its previous owner (Tom Hanks). She gets along fine with her neighbors. The owner is a very devout Christian (Viggo Mortensen) who uses his business to distribute her services to the poor. The neighbors also help her in her chores. She meets her neighbor's daughter (Allison Janney) and the two form a relationship. When she moves into the house, her blind father (Jim Carey) comes home to find her and the girl playing in the front yard. He is outraged that she is living with his daughter. She becomes very depressed and he leaves the house. The girl's mother (Nicole Kidman) and the girl's mother (Sally Hawkins) try to make her see the light. Eventually, they find a way to help her to see again. The movie is based on a play by playwright, William Goldman. Goldman also wrote the film "Rules of Attraction" (1993). I thought the movie was good. It is a drama about the influence of a blind woman on the life of a blind man. The movie is very touching and makes you think about the blind woman's influence on the life of the blind man. The acting is good and the story is well written. I recommend the movie to everyone.

Larry Schneider photo
Larry Schneider

I'm not sure how true this review is, but it seems to me that the first reviewer was mistaken about the two male leads. I think it's pretty obvious that these are the "naughty" ones in this film, and the female leads are a lot more "friendly" and "family-friendly". "Quirky" is not really the word I'd use to describe this film. I'm sure this film has been compared to the 1970s "American Pie" films, but to me this film has been much more serious, and has much more substance. And I think it's clear to me that the director wanted to present this as a "whole movie". If this film had only been about the "nice guy" (male) and the "nice girl" (female), the film would have been more successful. The two male leads are probably not the right characters for this film, but the film certainly shows that there are two different types of "super-heroes". And this film does not really have a happy ending. I think the director wanted to show the contrast between the two "superheroes" and how the two sides of the coin could be a little "naughty" and a little "nice". The film is definitely worth seeing. The two female leads do have some funny moments, but this is definitely a film for adults. I would definitely recommend this film to anyone.

Ronald W. photo
Ronald W.

Saw this film last night, and I thought it was a good film. Although the film was based on a stage play, it wasn't about the film itself. I am not a big fan of musicals (except for "Wicked" and "The Sound of Music" for some reason), but this film had a good message for me. I saw a lot of similar films in theaters recently. I think that this film could be a model for films in the future. I think it was the best movie of the year, because it kept me guessing the entire time. The music was good too. I will definitely buy the soundtrack. This is not a "I can't believe this movie was made" type of film. It is a great film. If you are in the mood for a good movie, you should definitely see this film.

Ryan R. photo
Ryan R.

I was very surprised by how good this movie was. I watched it on cable, because I've heard it was awful. I was so wrong. I just loved this movie. It was very emotional, and very well acted. It had an amazing message. It was a movie that you could easily see people you know as adults, who are also in their 20's or 30's watching it. I really liked how well the story line went. It had a great flow, and all the characters were great. I would recommend this movie to anyone. It is not one of those "gore" movies, which I was expecting, but it was really well done. This movie is great for anyone who enjoys good stories and movies, it is definitely worth a watch. It was a good movie to watch with friends.

Rebecca Gordon photo
Rebecca Gordon

A teen with an infectious smile, perfect hair, and a perfect figure, the 17 year old Emily plays the part of Nancy, the rebellious teenager who has been deprived of her mother and sister. Nancy is quite distraught that she can't have her mother anymore. After her father and step mother divorce, she is left with her two older sisters, who are also mothers and sisters, and she lives with her step mom, the older sister Kathy, who has a total of four sisters, three brothers, and a dog. In an attempt to move on from the pain of her childhood, she buys a big house, goes to college, and moves in with her fiance, who is a young nurse, who has a big crush on her. Nancy's life is not perfect, but it's not completely lost. After her step mom and step sister move out, her step dad gives her the house and is more supportive of her, especially since he's now married to his own father. Even so, she is still vulnerable to the peer pressure of her brothers, the siblings who are her friends, and her sister, the sister who has a big crush on her. With a bit of time to think about her situation, she starts to question why her life is so easy, and then she realizes that she really doesn't know how to live her life, and she wants to do something more. The plot is simple and easy to understand. I really didn't think too much of it, but it was a good movie. Not too complicated and not too simple. It's not a drama or anything, but it does have some serious moments. Emily is a very good actress, and I think she does a good job in this movie. The supporting actors are also good. Even though it's a small part of the film, I think it's nice to have two good actors. The movie has a lot of romance, which is what I like. I don't think I could relate to it very much, but I did enjoy it. The dialogue between Emily and her fiance is very well written. It was quite natural. The movie has some predictable moments, but it's a good film to watch. I also liked the idea of the father not being around as much as he used to be. It's nice to see that. I think it's a pretty good movie. I don't think I would watch it again, but it's a good film to watch. Overall, it's not a movie that I would be particularly

Lauren Cox photo
Lauren Cox

This is a story about three sisters who are struggling to deal with the death of their father. My one problem with this movie is that it was hard to find a young girl to play Rebecca. I think Jennifer Love Hewitt and Maya Rudolph were the best choices. I think you will be entertained if you like your movies with a happy ending. This movie was definitely made for people who like their movies with a happy ending. I am going to give this movie a 10 out of 10.

Patricia R. photo
Patricia R.

BEWARE OF SOME SCENES OF THIS MOVIE! SOME OF THE SCENES HAVE A LOT OF DETAIL, SOME HAVE NOTHING AT ALL. Some Scenes are very close to the book, some of the scenes are not! I would have given it a 10 if the movie was not so close to the book. If the movie were close to the book, then I would give it a 9. But, I would not have given it a 10, because it is too close. You have to really have read the book to understand what the movie is all about. However, if you have read the book, and don't understand all of the things, you will still enjoy the movie. It is worth seeing!

Emma Fuller photo
Emma Fuller

i loved the book, and it was a great book. i loved the movie too, but it's not the same book. the movie was wonderful, but i loved the book. i read it and i loved it. so i would definitely suggest the book. i would definitely recommend watching the movie if you haven't read it. and i love the book so much. and it has a lot of heart. i wish they could have done a little more to change the story, but it's not the same book. but it's great. and you will love the movie, you will love the book, you will love the movie. i would recommend it.

Jacob H. photo
Jacob H.

This is one of the most tragic love stories in movie history. Robin Williams plays a terminally ill boy and Rebecca DeMornay plays a young woman who wants to be a writer. They have an amicable friendship, but there is a big problem when they get married. The movie is actually very beautiful. It's beautiful because it shows a small town in the 1970's. You really can't imagine this town in the 1970's. It's really very beautiful and kind of reminds you of the movie "Twister". The cinematography was great. You can't really find a better example of cinematography in a movie than this one. The colors are so vibrant and beautiful and the music is so beautiful. This is one of my favorite movies of all time. If you haven't seen it, then see it!

Billy S. photo
Billy S.

It's not that I didn't like this movie. It's just that I didn't like the ending. In a movie like this, where you spend so much time building up to the story that the ending should be very clear. But this movie is a masterpiece of character development, and I think that the ending was confusing. And it was also predictable. So, in the end, it was kind of like a dry erase board. I liked the acting, but it was kind of weird that every time they said something about something important to the story, it seemed to be obvious what they were saying. I liked the plot and everything, but it just wasn't the same. And when you've watched a movie like this, you don't expect it to be that good.

Anthony G. photo
Anthony G.

I have been a fan of the older versions of the "Twilight" series since the late 1990s. I watched "Twilight" movies in the late 1990s, and I would watch them again, but they were not great. Then, I watched "The Hunger Games" movies in the mid-2000s, and they were excellent. I was disappointed when the "Twilight" movies started with the beginning. The first movie was okay. The second movie was much better. This movie was a little bit of both. I thought the movie was great, but I can't say that about the books. The characters were good. The acting was great. There was some sexual content, and it was PG-13. I have read the books, and I thought that the books were better, but I was disappointed when I watched the movie. I really loved the movie. The costumes were great, and the acting was amazing. The story was fantastic. The characters were well-played. The acting was outstanding. I enjoyed watching the movie. The movie is amazing. If you haven't read the books, you won't like the movie. The books were great. The movie was great. The movies are great. They are great. I recommend that you read the books, and then watch the movie.

Carl photo

Beautiful and uplifting, a worthy movie for anyone who loves to watch movies and appreciate art.

Douglas Wallace photo
Douglas Wallace

The story of The Little Women was written by novelist Lawrence Durrell and adapted for the screen by director Tim Burton. Directed by Tim Burton, The Little Women is a delightful movie, with an outstanding cast. Kirsten Dunst is the perfect child-like ingenue. Elizabeth Olsen is a sharp, charming woman who is totally believable as a rich young girl who wants to be a doctor. And Laurence Olivier gives a wonderful performance as a gentleman and a gentleman's man, and he's the perfect actor for the role. Maggie Smith, as well as the two brothers, are adorable and fully develop their characters. It is a nice story that is reminiscent of Dickens and other classics, with a touch of Shakespearean allusions. And the songs are a nice bonus. The special effects are well done, and the movie makes you want to buy the soundtrack. Recommended for anyone who enjoys the romantic-comedy genre. 7/10

Angela Tran photo
Angela Tran

I have been a big fan of The Wolf of Wall Street for years, and I have to say, I was disappointed in this one. I thought it was too short, and the plot line didn't really go anywhere. The movie is about 1 hour, and it felt like 2 or 3 hours. I could go on about this, but I think everyone would agree that the movie is over-long, so I'll end it here. I was disappointed, because I thought it was a good movie, but I don't think it is worth the hype. Overall, I think it's a good movie, but I don't think it's worth the hype. It's a good movie, but it doesn't feel like a good movie.