فيلم 120 battements par minute

120 battements par minute

120 battements par minute is a movie starring Nahuel Pérez Biscayart, Arnaud Valois, and Adèle Haenel. Members of the advocacy group ACT UP Paris demand action by the government and pharmaceutical companies to combat the AIDS...

Other Titles
120 Beats Per Minute, 120 uderzeń serca, 120 pulsaciones por minuto, BPM (Beats Per Minute), 120 Beats per Minute, 120 battiti al minuto, 120 χτύποι το λεπτό, 120 BPM (Beats Per Minute), 120 slag i minuttet, 120 BPM/batai pe minut, 120 Pe'imot be'daka, Kalp Atışı Dakikada 120, 120 otkucaja u minuti, 120 latidos por minutos, 120 Schläge pro Minute, 120 latidos por minuto, BPM ビート・パー・ミニット, 120 Batimentos por Minuto, Centoventi battiti al minuto, 120 slag i minuten, BPM, 120 de batai pe minut, 120 Battements par minute, 120 Batimentos Por Minuto, 120 dobbanás percenként, 120 BPM, 120 dūžių per minutę
Running Time
2 hours 23 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama
Director
Robin Campillo
Writer
Robin Campillo, Philippe Mangeot
Actors
Antoine Reinartz, Nahuel Pérez Biscayart, Arnaud Valois, Adèle Haenel
Country
France
Year
2017
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Members of the advocacy group ACT UP Paris demand action by the government and pharmaceutical companies to combat the AIDS epidemic in the early 1990s.

Comments about drama «120 battements par minute» (20)

Thomas G. photo
Thomas G.

Beautifully shot and acted, John Cusak's 1991 film The Big Empty is the most boring, and in the eyes of many a well-made, but overlong film. In it, Cusak sets out to explore the decline of his protagonist, a widower, Robert Zemeckis, who, after suffering a car accident that killed his wife, has the ambition of having his own museum. Cusak's main character, Robert, lives with his wife, Linda, and young son, Tom, on a big sprawling house in Los Angeles. From time to time, Robert's parents (played by Jonathan Taylor Thomas, and Dan Hedaya) come to visit him, and, with no real reason, Robert moves from one parent to another, making them distant and less than sympathetic. Robert's life slowly falls apart, and when he receives a phone call from the museum curator (Michael Gambon), who claims to be his dead wife's ghost, Robert decides to let Linda go, and decide to give up his own museum, believing that this will bring Linda's spirit back to life, which is something that Robert never wanted, as she was the first person to visit his museum, and the last person he loved. The end of the film is not quite what Cusak intended, but what he intended, is that Robert would eventually give up his museum, and become nothing more than a mid-life crisis. As Robert is reading The Big Empty, he discovers that Robert Zemeckis is actually his dead wife's ghost, and, as Robert begins to run from his problem, Robert realises that he never wanted to have a museum in the first place. Robert then explains to his son, Tom, that he is not entirely sure why he ever decided to have his own museum. Robert begins to see it as a dead end, and decides to spend his last days at home. In between scenes, Cusak makes this argument: "The big empty is about everything. It's the last day of our lives, our final moments, our last moments of life. It's about life, death, and everything. It's about the end of everything." Robert feels trapped by his personal struggles, and the ghosts of his wife and son, and the place of his mother in life, he cannot see the life that he once had. As Robert admits that he's lost his family, the ghosts begin to attack him, and Robert starts to develop a deep sense of fear. He starts to build a circle of family friends, and slowly begin to lose them. When the funeral for his dead wife comes around, the ghosts show up, and take Robert's body. After Robert has died, Linda arrives, and she invites Robert's ghosts to stay in her house, while she searches for Robert. She gives them all the money she has, and takes Robert's first-born son, Tom. She even throws away the key to Robert's museum, leaving Robert's son a blank note. Eventually, Robert, Linda and Tom all return to their old home, and the ghosts disappear. The ending is not a happy one, and not a fitting one, and the film would be complete if Cusak had ended it a little earlier. The cinematography is beautiful, the lighting is perfect, and the performances are all excellent. Gambon gives an excellent performance as the creepy museum curator, and Thomas is quite convincing as Robert's character, but the real star is Michael Gambon, who plays Robert Zemeckis. Gambon plays his part perfectly, with an almost hypnotic ability to control the audience. He is so convincing in this role, that when he's in character, you know exactly what is going to happen next. The Big Empty is a rare film, where the actors play their roles very well, and even Cusak's direction is excellent. The Big Empty is a film that everyone should see, it's a perfect example of the dumbed down, outdated, and garbage Hollywood movie that has become. When the stars of The Big Empty are able to make a film with such high standards, it's good to see that even the dullest and most mediocre films can be made entertaining. Highly recommended.

Eric Rice photo
Eric Rice

With all due respect to all the "memories" this is not a film that is going to be remembered for all of its worth. However, despite all of this its two protagonists, the great David Thewlis and the almost child-like Richard Griffiths, and other actors and actresses in the film, its no better than a film like the NAKED FILM. Its just another coming of age film and is unfortunately aimed at kids. The reason this film didn't work for me, and I should note that I am a fan of screenwriters of the English-language, was simply because this film was about two guys, who were both and in their own way where all too aware of their own faults and both what they could have done, had they been at the same age, so to speak. The fact that they were in a group where everybody wanted to be part of the group, made the group seem to them a family and when they realised this they were all going to be in the same place as one another, they just didn't see what was really going on. Had they been in a different place, at different times, would they have had a different approach to life? But that is not the point of the film. The point of the film is that two strangers, when they are at their most naïve and are growing up at their most naive, must each have a different story to tell. The one, at his age, who went through life like a zombie, never really feeling alive, yet the one who has been through life trying to find his place and his purpose, has become his brother and his best friend. I think the film is quite a significant, not just for David Thewlis and Richard Griffiths, but for all of us, who have to come of age at a time when we are going to grow up. The reason why I liked this film so much was simply because of the fact that there were no lines, and it didn't try to be a film where we would have to ask ourselves "Why was he in the group?" We have to realise that its the story of David and Richard, and that their lives are both pretty similar. And I believe that if there were to be a "Godfather" of the English-language film, this would be it. However, if you are looking for a film about life in the 80s, and can live with that, you will like this film. However, if you are a film maker who doesn't like to make films about the 80s, you will find it hard to like this film. It is hard to accept that David Thewlis could be the boy who goes through life like a zombie, yet Richard Griffiths is now much more like his father, and the brothers would be in the same age group and still have the same relationship. Perhaps its just because I was a kid, but I still don't think that Richard Griffiths was in the same age group with David Thewlis. I have a theory that Richard Griffiths was probably 13, David Thewlis was probably 14, and David Thewlis was in his mid 20s, when Richard Griffiths would have been in his mid 20s. Maybe I am wrong, and I am going to need to see a documentary about the 80s to get that theory. Anyway, to sum up, this film is about two boys growing up and moving through life. This film was just not about anything else other than the experience of growing up, and the feeling that I was growing up in a different place and time to the one that I was growing up in. I enjoyed this film, and that is why I rate it highly.

Douglas Lee photo
Douglas Lee

That night in the Swedish countryside, as the sun went down, and it was still dark outside, the lights of the hotel came on in full. It was the start of a great night. A night of hope, a night of hope, a night of hope. The movie opens with a scene that makes you say "Wow. I've never seen anything like that in my entire life". It's an actual, raw shot from the battle of the fire at Passchendaele, in World War II. It's the battle that defines the character of John Fitzgerald Grant. John knows that he's going to die, and that it won't be pleasant, but he is determined to do it with his heart and his courage. The war is a relentless barrage, one continuous assault with no break. The bravado of Grant and his two younger brothers is the key to the movie's strength. They are simply fearless, and in the midst of the fury they know what to do. One young brother is left behind, and John begins his journey into war. As the battle continues, John finally discovers that he can't go on the battle. The Germans are determined to take him alive. In the last few minutes of the movie, the connection between John and his two brothers is made, and the camera pulls back from John to the other brothers, who also knew that their brother would be taken, and are scared beyond belief. John learns that he can't go on the battle. It would mean a meaningless death. John leaves his brother behind and rushes out to the front. On his way, he is chased by the Germans, until the last shot of the movie is taken. The camera goes back to the battle of Passchendaele, and in the background is a young soldier who knows that he must stay alive to finish his mission. It's an epic movie, the kind of movie that deserves every award that it has ever been nominated for. It is pure cinema, pure inspiration, pure poetry. It's more than a story of bravery, it is a story of hope. And it is a movie that should be on everyones must see list. It is, in my humble opinion, the finest movie of all time. It is worthy of its place in cinema history, and it is the movie that will, hopefully, be remembered. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Harold photo
Harold

If a film is so emotionally involved in its audience, and so engaging in its cast, and so attractive in its camera, and so engaging in its themes and ideas, then it needs to be rated extremely high. I suppose it does. Unfortunately, "A League of Their Own" is that film. Yes, it has a magnificent cast, a plot that is original and intriguing, and good performances. But I'm not sure any of those elements could have been done better. The movie is so passionate in its view of baseball, it is over-the-top and a bit unbelievable. It doesn't take itself too seriously. Its themes and ideas are so mainstream. I thought the movie could have done without it. It was distracting, and, worse, seemed out of place. That, and the cast couldn't carry the movie. I think the star power and characters were the only things that held it together. I give it a 9 out of 10.

Theresa Harvey photo
Theresa Harvey

Most movies these days are full of bad acting, bad writing, and at best a weak script. Some films even look like they are made for kids. This movie takes all of that out and puts it all back together. From the beginning to the end you just have to get out of there. By the time you come out you will have thought about it for a long time. And the last word is.amazing!

Cynthia Castro photo
Cynthia Castro

This movie is just good in every aspect. It is a movie that reminds you of everything that is happening today. I have seen it several times and I still like it. The actors are superb in this movie. The script is just incredible. It reminds you a lot of Oliver Stone's "Platoon". The direction is just brilliant. It is not a movie that you can watch once, but I would definitely recommend it to every one. You must watch this movie if you have not seen it yet. And I really would not say that the action is just a small part of the movie. It is really the main part. The action scenes are very well shot, well edited and very entertaining. The storyline is excellent. It is good to see a movie that makes you think. You will definitely remember this movie and it is a great movie to watch.

Peter Thomas photo
Peter Thomas

This movie is about the torture of a woman who left her family and went to live in a poor and remote region. It is a complex story about her struggles, her love and devotion to her husband, the expectations of the society she was fleeing from and her inability to adjust to the harsh surroundings. Her powerlessness to speak for her is described in many ways. The film is so powerful and we witness so many great performances. The woman, Waleed, has the power to do so much in such a small area. Although this is not a new subject, there are few movies about it. The cast in this film gives us an insight into this man, and we see what his love is worth. Waleed is a gifted actress and she has proved this in this film. I do not want to give too much of the story away but this is not a movie for the weak. It is a sensitive and human story that has a deeper meaning and meaning. It is a must see for all those who love story and love movies. Also, this movie is great because it is so intense and graphic, yet it is also very touching.

Amy photo
Amy

This is one of my favorite films of all time. I saw it at a late night screening and was captivated from start to finish. I think that's what makes it special, the fact that it was a special film. It's an excellent story, one that is unique in it's own way, and the cast is perfect. The story is unique because it's a serial killer movie. The movie is true to the real life cases it portrays, but the movie is not real. It is an absolute work of fiction. The screenplay is wonderful. The cast is perfect. The acting is great. It's just a real story that is unique in it's own way. This movie will not fail to please any horror fan, and I think it deserves the popularity it has. It is one of the most intense and horrifying movies I have ever seen, and it is definitely a must see for any horror fan. 9/10

Mark Arnold photo
Mark Arnold

This movie may not be the best of the Tarantino's movies, but it is definitely one of his best. It is so good, the cast is fantastic, and the storyline is full of twists and turns, and the last fifteen minutes is just as good as the rest of the movie. All the cast was amazing in their roles, they all performed exceptionally well. The movie is simply the perfect mixture of comedy, drama and action. In my opinion, it is one of the best movies of the year. If you are interested in watching a movie that is full of surprises, entertaining and cool characters, and a great plot, than I strongly recommend this movie. You can get a ticket for a theater near you.

Jessica G. photo
Jessica G.

This is not a typical look into the life of a professional but an actual look at the reality of many people who are at the bottom of the heap in this modern day age. Despite the fact that most of the people portrayed here were not, in fact, professional actors, they were at the very bottom of the pool. They seemed to be trapped in a life that was worse than death. I believe this film is a celebration of life for these people and perhaps a protest against the hell that is existence. To those who claim that they don't like these people, I don't think you understand the horror and struggle these people lived. The ending of this film is absolutely brilliant. It represents the final moment of life for these people and to think of their lives this way is an incredible feat. It's a film that requires a certain amount of concentration and concentration can be broken by many things. I recommend this film to anyone and anyone who has a heart should see this film.

Joan photo
Joan

It's a very peculiar film. It's about a young woman in an intellectual and somewhat dangerous mental state who was insane for 15 years. She has just come out of a psychiatric hospital. The first half of the movie is about her daughter growing up and leaving home. Then the second half of the film is about her making a family. I think this is a very strange movie. It's all done in a very clever way. The director was not interested in trying to be funny. He was interested in his subject. The film has a very unusual style. There is a scene where a man comes in and the father just walks away. I don't know how that is done, but it looks very weird. The film has a very young cast. I really think that the film would have been a great movie if it was made by a serious actor who didn't seem to care what the viewer thinks. And it would have been more interesting. It is very peculiar, but I think this film is very good. It's a very strange movie and it's good.

Hannah H. photo
Hannah H.

This was a great movie, I had a feeling this movie would be good and I wasn't disappointed. This movie takes the time to explore the complexities of relationships and how each person interacts with the people in his or her life. What I really enjoyed is the fact that I could see how the characters felt, it's very realistic, and it's easy to see why people are like the people they are. For some reason I enjoyed how the movie stayed true to life and told a story that everyone can relate to. As a married woman myself, I would like to say this is a must see.

George photo
George

This is the only film I've seen recently that is based on a true story. And yet the documentary on the film, directed by the author's, is far better than the movie itself. The movie focuses on the 4 local councils (Abertawe Broichdaddy (AB) the Mid-West Abertawe Broichdaddy (MB) the South-East Abertawe Broichdaddy (SB) and the North-West Abertawe Broichdaddy (NWB). The documentary has a real sense of a real situation and many hidden moments. The movie, on the other hand, is a bit of a take on the events that unfolded and the problems the director was trying to portray. That could be a good thing but could also be a bad thing as I found the movie quite boring.

Rachel Mendoza photo
Rachel Mendoza

this is a very good movie.It deals with a man that only knows his life from the first days of his life,even the prison (the man cant see his wife and son),he watches his daily life,his interactions with the outside world and everyday routines.his mother is a street fighter,his father is in jail,the part of his life that is frozen and frozen,only watching TV and going to the barber (where he receives his haircut).and he has to live for his wife and son. This is a movie that deals with a man's life that is frozen,but we can see that he is a man of deep feeling,full of life,he doesn't even care about himself.the most important thing is that he wants to be with his wife and son,he wants to be normal,he wants to be with his wife.he can only find that in the television,his life from this moment on is completely frozen and it doesn't get any better.he cannot see his wife or his son anymore.he sees only the outside world,the TV and the bars.everything else is frozen.the next moment he leaves the prison,the next minute he finds his wife and the next minute he sees his son again.now he is back to the prison,and he finds his wife again.this movie makes you think that we are always living our life and trying to survive from the moment of our birth,how it all starts,and when it ends.

Jonathan D. photo
Jonathan D.

It is not often I am pleased with a movie. Not once has that happened in this "Hollywood" production. Great cast and great script. The scriptwriter is a regular Joe, not Hollywood. The execution is amateur. If you are interested in such stuff, rent some "the silent movie", a real "masterpiece". If you don't mind watching a 10 min movie, this one will be worth it. But for a lazy weekend of leisure, this is an enjoyable diversion. The cinematography is pleasant, the photography is beautiful, the editing is OK. I just wish the actors would have been more well-cast. I believe the "acting" in this movie could have been better. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Peter photo
Peter

I first read about the film, called "The Thin Red Line", in a magazine called "Air Forces Quarterly" (no relation to the magazine "Air Force Magazine"). It was at that magazine that I first came across Tom Hanks' performance as Private Ryan. He plays the part of Private Ryan with a deftness and delicacy that is both touching and painful. I had never been in the army, but the basic ideas of the film are resonating with me. One of the recurring themes is the ethics of war, and how the military's ethics are governed by the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions, both of which are designed to protect soldiers, not the civilian populations. The movie shows how the basic ethics of the military are bound up with the nature of war. The American President knows the rules of war and the laws of war, but there is no legal basis to impose his rules. They are based on the culture of the military. The general consensus seems to be that the best way to deal with a war situation is to treat the enemy as you would a civilian in your own country. And that is what the generals want to do. This is a film about a man who had an opportunity to be a hero, but instead, he chose to sacrifice the lives of his buddies, who he knew were out of the war zone, in order to protect a minor town, which was not a war zone at all. The soldiers are not stupid, they know what is going on. They are not corrupt, they know they are under a strict moral code that will protect them from any moral and legal violations. In fact, we see them at the bar. One of the rules of the military is that the bar is the place where the bad guys hang out. In the bar, the officers look at their men and say, "If you take the bar, you will have to stay there. If you don't, you will be asked to leave." So, the movie shows a realistic portrayal of the effects of military ethics on soldiers who are now in civilian life. One of the great things about this movie is that it shows how the human spirit survives the brutality of war. The only person who really suffers is the one who has to come back to his old life to find out what happened. I think that if the movie had been made in the 1950's, the message would have been more applicable to the Vietnam War, when the Vietnam War was more apparent and the American public more concerned with getting along with its allies. The scene where the general orders the men to put on their uniforms was a bit too explicit. But the basic message of the movie is right on. There is no way you can believe that a soldier would risk his life for a small town. You can't believe that a young man would sacrifice his friend to protect the town. There is no way you can believe that the people of that small town would risk their lives to protect their neighbor. These are not people you can stand next to. Tom Hanks is so effective in his portrayal of Private Ryan that I think we should see it again, because he is not the most famous actor out there. That distinction goes to the late Bob Gunton, who plays the Lt. Commander of a platoon of soldiers in "Bonnie and Clyde". Gunton played the role of Lt. Col. Willis, and his character was a man who could not stop cracking jokes, but still had a soul and a sense of decency and honor. In the scene where Private Ryan is trying to defuse the situation with the Viet Cong, the Lt. Col. gives Private Ryan the good advice, "We will call this a day and go home." It is a chilling and thought-provoking scene, but at the end of the day, it is a statement of the ethics of war, that everyone should be held to the same standard. This movie could also apply to the civilians of the movie. After all, they are not the ones who should be held to a higher standard. They should be held to the same standard as the soldiers are held to. They are all in the same line of fire, and if they break it, they are going to be put out of action. I hope this film will make it into more cinemas.

Billy photo
Billy

Just like the German person (and even worse), the Italian person has made this out to be more than what it was, and it is nothing more than a rather shallow portrayal of a man (again, German, but still). Just think, that there were people in America in the 70s who thought the same. Yet, it seems there are still people who feel the need to bring back the glory days of the 70s. They find it to be offensive to look at the faults of the 70s, and the need to change. That's what they call "positivity" - or the wish to be better, as they call it. No matter what. The film didn't attempt to be the opposite of a "What the f*k was that?"-fest, but the opposite of a "huh, what?"-fest. Yes, it's "spoiling" something, and it will definitely have a negative effect on a lot of people, but it's better than that. It's real. It's not a story about a guy or a woman, or even a guy and a girl. The story is about how society changes people, and how people change the people they meet, and how people change themselves. And not to mention the "message" the film gives. Not to mention that the film is pretty good, the performances are good, and the cinematography and editing is good. For me, this is a film that will not be easily forgotten.

Kathy H. photo
Kathy H.

I have a strange fascination with this film. I've read the book before I watched it and it is very hard to follow, yet the book is very close to my heart. I read the book and when I watched the film, I couldn't help but find a lot of the book with the movie that was very true to the book. The movie has it's problems, but I think it is a very faithful portrayal of an extremely depressing book. It is very raw and real in some parts. The movie is a bleak reality, but it is also beautifully shot. It is beautiful to look at the beauty and the pain that we all feel. I really loved this movie, it has so much to offer. It has a very uplifting and hopeful ending, I found myself crying when the credits started to roll. I don't know what it was that made the film so good, but it has to be a lot of things. I think that people need to see this movie. It is an honest and beautiful portrayal of a terrible and tragic period in American history. I also have to admit, that I am biased. I am a very ardent supporter of the Israeli Defense Forces and have always felt that they have been so misunderstood. When I first saw this movie, I didn't even know what it was about, but as the movie progressed, it was so clear and shocking. I don't want to give away anything, but you have to see it to know what I mean. If you like your movies realistic and you don't mind the gritty look, then this movie is for you.

Vincent M. photo
Vincent M.

American Hero is the most compelling film I've seen in the last couple of years. This is the first film I have ever seen that is so refreshingly different from what I am used to. The plot is brilliant and most of the characters are great. I can't recommend this film enough. This movie is one of the best I have seen in a long time.

Nancy Kim photo
Nancy Kim

This film by Guilio D'Onofrio is based on the novel The Real Don Juan by his brother Gio, and I have read and reviewed the book many times before. One thing about the book is the ending. The book has the real Don Juan hanging by the hand of his partner on the shore of a lake in the middle of the night. The real Don Juan was about 70-years-old. The only trouble with the ending was that the real Don Juan, who was hanging by the hand of his partner, and whose real name was Diego, was too young to have any relationships with his partner. As a movie, it was very well done. The location was beautiful, the dialog was realistic, the acting was good. The film is about two people. The woman, a mother, and the man, a lover. The man, Diego, is a lover who is old enough to have relationships with his partner. The woman, Marina, is a mother who lives alone in a tower block in the middle of nowhere, where the sun never rises. She has no job, no money, and is in deep debt from a loan. So she does what she can to get money for her son, who she refuses to take to school. When she is on the run from the police, she gets in contact with the real Don Juan, Diego, who is hanging by his partner's hand, who is at the end of his life, and wants her to see the true Don Juan who he is. The movie has a wonderful moral. One man's life is his own, and his partner's life is his. That's why they call it a love story, and it is beautiful. The real Don Juan is a great director, a real musician, and a real human being. Watch the movie. I gave it 9 out of 10.