فيلم Miekkailija

Miekkailija

Miekkailija is a movie starring Märt Avandi, Ursula Ratasepp, and Hendrik Toompere Sr.. Fleeing from the Russian secret police, a young Estonian fencer is forced to return to his homeland, where he becomes a physical education...

Other Titles
Die Kinder des Fechters, Szermierz, Fäktaren, Mačevalac, El esgrimista, Fekteren, La clase de esgrima, Scrimerul, Le Maître d'Escrime, El último duelo, Ο ξιφομάχος, こころに剣士を, A vívó, Fægteren, Endel - der Fechter, Vehkleja, 擊劍大師, The Fencer, O Esgrimista
Running Time
1 hours 39 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Drama, History, Biography, Sport
Director
Klaus Härö
Writer
Anna Heinämaa
Actors
Ursula Ratasepp, Märt Avandi, Liisa Koppel, Hendrik Toompere Sr.
Country
Estonia, Finland, Germany
Year
2015
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Fleeing from the Russian secret police, a young Estonian fencer is forced to return to his homeland, where he becomes a physical education teacher at a local school. The past however catches up and puts him in front of a difficult choice.

Comments about drama «Miekkailija» (12)

Adam R. photo
Adam R.

This film is about a young boy who, after his parents are killed, must learn to be a man and survive. He has to learn the value of life, and the values of good and evil. The film is about the history of the Bosnian War, and how people have a hard time understanding each other. The film is about the great pain that the Bosnian people have gone through in the past few years, and how hard it was for a young boy to understand. The film is very realistic, and has an important message for all people. I recommend this film to anyone who wants to learn more about the Bosnian War.

Justin P. photo
Justin P.

It is my experience that not all the audiences have an appreciation for movies, that most of them prefer to watch action movies. I saw this movie and found it to be very entertaining. It was the first time I saw a movie like this. I am not a big movie buff but I was drawn to it by the movie trailer. I have watched a lot of movies but not all of them have been that good. The movie is based on the book "The Devil's Chessboard". The book is a classic and I have read the book many times, and it is still entertaining to read it. The movie is a combination of a chess game and a "blackmail" game. The main characters are an American chess player, an American spy and a Russian spy. The main character is American, the spy is Russian and the spy is Russian. The movie starts with a chess game and the chess game continues for a couple of days and then they stop. The movie is very exciting and I loved the way the movie is directed. It is a good movie but it is not a classic movie. It is not a movie for everyone. The movie is very entertaining but I do not think it is a movie to watch more than once.

Daniel K. photo
Daniel K.

I watched this movie on my personal day off from work. I knew it was a very difficult subject matter for anyone to handle. I was right. But I was also right in believing that this movie would be worth my time. I had read a few reviews of this movie before it was released. I was skeptical. After watching the movie, I can see why. The movie was well-made, the acting was good. And it was a story that I believe anyone could relate to. I would recommend this movie to anyone who would like to see a movie about a major topic that is difficult to discuss with your family. This movie will definitely make you feel a lot better about the events that took place in World War II.

Julie photo
Julie

One of the most famous Serbian athletes of the 20th century, and one of the most famous in the history of the nation, Dragan Stojkov is the subject of this movie. The story of Stojkov is well-told and it is interesting to watch how the movie goes. The movie starts with a short biography of the athlete, and then it goes to the life of the man, who is at the peak of his career. From this point on the movie goes from a sports documentary to a biography of Stojkov. The film also contains some very emotional moments, that you will find hard to forget. It is interesting to see how the movie uses the famous film "Sport" to tell the story. For example, the film shows how Stojkov used his status to blackmail a sports journalist, or how he tried to get a positive comment about the movie. You will find that Stojkov is a very famous person in the history of Serbia, but that does not mean that he is the greatest athlete of all time. The movie has many moments that you will find hard to forget. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes sports documentaries, or who loves Serbian history.

Brenda photo
Brenda

The story of the games in the World Cup of 1936 was told in a very interesting way. The movie is very well made and very well acted. The story was very much like the real story, but it was also told very well. The movie was interesting, and not boring. There was a lot of history that was told in this movie. I would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a movie that is about the World Cup of 1936. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes football.

Shirley G. photo
Shirley G.

I went into this movie expecting a mediocre, uninspiring, and overall disappointing portrayal of a fight between two great nations, one of which was really big and powerful. However, the movie is actually an excellent portrayal of a rivalry between two men. I liked the movie, and it was not boring. The action sequences were well-done and exciting. The screenplay was interesting and well-written. The direction was solid, and the music was good. The acting was well-done, as expected. The only thing I disliked about this movie was the "sadism" of the characters. I didn't find any of the characters in the movie to be that sympathetic. I found them to be a lot of people that were far too evil for their own good. However, the sadism of these characters was justified in the story, and the movie portrayed it as such. Overall, this movie was very well-done, and I highly recommend it.

Johnny O. photo
Johnny O.

The movie is based on the life of a young woman named "Hansa" (Margit Brannstrom) who is a Russian actress, who plays the part of a rebel against the Soviet regime. It was a tough time for the Soviet regime, when a revolution took place in the country, and the actress and other people are arrested. One day, a man comes to Hansa, and asks her to become a member of the Red Army, in order to help the regime in their struggle against the enemy. But, Hansa is not ready for this, and she doesn't want to be a part of this. But, as time goes on, she realizes that she doesn't want to be a part of this, and she wants to be independent. So, the movie is a good drama movie, which shows the life of a woman who is a person who is really against the Soviet regime, and she wants to be free. I think this is a very good movie, it is a great drama movie. This is the first movie of the director about the Soviet regime, and it is a good movie.

Olivia photo
Olivia

Kadri is a woman who became a famous singer, but at the age of 22, she broke down in her home, and died. She is buried in the garden of a local church. Her husband (Peter Sajdak) is a policeman who became a mayor in his own right. He wants to sell his land. He meets the girl, Maria, who tells him about the family history. The movie is a documentary-like film, but with a very moving story, and it gives you an idea about the situation in Bosnia. I think that this movie is very good. I liked it a lot.

Ryan photo
Ryan

There is a good amount of historical information in this movie, and there is a little more about the Soviet Union than I expected, but the movie is very superficial. In the end, the movie is just about the lives of a group of athletes, and it does not make a great deal of sense. I know that the movie was a work of fiction, but it still does not make sense, because I do not believe that the people who wrote the script were really inspired by the Soviet Union, as it was portrayed in the movie. It seems more like a documentary. If you want to know more about the Soviet Union, check out "Glory of the Red Army" (a documentary about the Soviet Union) or "From the Red Line to the Red Square" (a documentary about the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union's people). Both of these documentaries are also very good.

Grace Cooper photo
Grace Cooper

First, let me say that I am not an English speaker, so it was difficult for me to follow the plot of this movie. However, I do believe that it is possible to follow this movie if you understand the basic story. The movie is set in the days before the Warsaw Uprising, a period of time when Poland was ruled by the Russian Empire. The film shows how the Polish people managed to hold on to their independence and struggle for independence in the face of the aggressive Soviet Union. The film is divided into 3 parts: the first, the revolution of 1940, the second, the first days of 1944, and the last, the resistance of 1944. The first part of the film is the first time that we see the Warsaw Uprising. This is the story of the uprising of the Polish people against the Russians. The acting in the film is fantastic. The characters are portrayed very well. The film is very realistic. The violence is also realistic, which is not a bad thing. I really liked this movie, and I highly recommend it.

Dennis F. photo
Dennis F.

While the film lacks in many aspects, one thing that it does have is a great story. The story is told in a very artistic way, the story is not so much about the fact that these men were leaders in their field, but it is about the way they were able to overcome all of the odds and not give up. It's not a perfect film, but it is a great film and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the Yugoslav war. The film has a very interesting cast, the cast did an excellent job in conveying the characters' emotions, and they were able to express their feelings in a very effective manner. Overall, I would give this film a rating of 8/10.

Cheryl Porter photo
Cheryl Porter

I was in Finland when this movie was released, and I had seen it once. The time I saw it was the summer of 2002. It was great. When the movie was over, I asked my wife, who is also a Finnish film fan, if she had seen the movie. She said she had not. I was then shocked. She had never even heard of it. I was like, "What's wrong with you?!" So, I went to see it again, and then, I finally rented it. I had forgotten that it was a movie about a bunch of football players who were in a situation where they had to make a stand and defend their country. The movie is very good. The acting was very good. The story was very good. I have to say that this movie is about more than just football. It is about the politics of Finland in the 20th century. It is about the resistance of the Finnish people against the fascist regime of the country's founding father, World War II. I had not heard about the movie, but I learned more about it than I ever thought I would. It is a must-see for all Finnish film fans.