فيلم Studio 54

Studio 54

Studio 54 is a movie starring Ian Schrager, Steve Rubell, and Donald Rubell. The story of the notorious 1970s New York City nightclub.

Other Titles
Studio 54 - The Documentary, Studio 54 - verdens vildeste natklub, Klubas Studio 54
Running Time
1 hours 38 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Documentary, History
Director
Matt Tyrnauer
Actors
Donald Rubell, Ian Schrager, Neil Schlesinger, Steve Rubell
Country
USA
Year
2018
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The story of the notorious 1970s New York City nightclub.

Comments about documentary «Studio 54» (33)

Zachary photo
Zachary

This documentary was presented at the Sundance Film Festival and was pretty good. I do not know how the film would have fared with an Academy Award. But this film is worth seeing. It is a very personal story of a couple who met in the 70s and went through life together, but then divorced and had a child. They are very happy and just want to enjoy life together. One of the films they chose to use is "The Marriage Refused" by Daniel Ellsberg. This is a documentary about the ACLU that fought to stop the Vietnam War. There were a lot of real life scenes that were very well done. This is an excellent documentary. It is worth seeing and should be seen by all.

Joshua Sullivan photo
Joshua Sullivan

When it comes to the art of movie making, the results will vary from film to film. For most people, the result will be as good as the movie itself. This is not the case with the Oscar winning documentary The Life Of David Gale, which ran on the network television network Lifetime. The documentary tells the story of the life of David Gale, a notorious serial killer who murdered between five and twelve women in the late 1970's and early 1980's. The documentary's central thesis is that Gale was a sociopath who was obsessed with himself and his image. The film, which was never made into a movie, reveals some disturbing details of Gale's life, including his sexual obsessions, his complete lack of remorse for the murders he committed, and the fact that he spent the majority of his time in a mental institution. The filmmakers also reveal some shocking facts about Gale's violent sexual fantasies. The documentary is truly a strange and disturbing movie. The interviewees, which include lawyers, family members, and even his psychiatrist, reveal some disturbing facts about Gale's personality, including his obsession with himself, his lack of remorse, and his constant need for attention. The documentary is full of disturbing information about Gale's history, including a personal essay about his childhood and a radio interview where he discusses his obsession with his image. The film is not for the faint of heart, and it is highly disturbing. The fact that this was never made into a movie is also disturbing. Overall, the documentary is disturbing and disturbing. The interviewees tell the story of Gale's life with some disturbing facts, and the documentary does a good job at telling the story of the serial killer. The documentary is a dark and disturbing movie, and it is highly disturbing.

Phillip Myers photo
Phillip Myers

The film has a good story, but it's all in the editing. The acting was good, but all in the editing. The pacing of the film was great. Overall, the editing is one of the best things about this film. I recommend this film to anyone looking for a good movie to watch on a Sunday night. This is definitely a film that I will be purchasing on DVD, and buying for myself to watch over and over.

Jean G. photo
Jean G.

I was a fan of John Waters from the start, and I was really looking forward to this film. Well, it was a disappointing waste of time. The film had a great cast of actors, but it just seemed to be a farce all the way through. It was really funny when he talks about God, but I found it completely lacking in real comedy. At one point he says, "I have to make an admission to you: I have a problem. I am a Christian, and I think God is just a man." What is that all about? I know that most of us are Christians, but this is just a cartoon. I think he should have stuck to the actual script and made a documentary. That would have been more interesting and realistic.

Steven photo
Steven

I saw this movie in the theater in the early 1990s. The reason I bought the DVD was that it had excellent VHS picture and sound quality. I got it for my VCR, as I had it on VHS at the time and it was on my VCR's deck. I recorded it off my VCR. It was an awesome movie. I had my VCR for 6 years. This movie is not for the faint of heart or for the sensitive. I do not believe this movie was ever shown on the VHS format. I think they decided to kill the movie off, and I am sorry for them. The VHS looks like a low budget film, and the sound quality is horrible. This movie has a lot of good scenes, but the movie itself is boring. I do not recommend this movie to anyone, but if you have a VHS player and would like to watch this movie, you could, but you will lose the high quality VHS picture and sound quality. That is a shame. This movie is a good movie to see in the theater, but I do not recommend it for VHS format.

Laura photo
Laura

As a huge fan of the 70's horror movies, and of the cults of the era, I was quite interested in seeing this documentary. As someone who's never seen the TV series, I was disappointed with the cast list. Some were given interviews but none of them had anything to say about their favorite moments. It's as if they're really only interested in the movie stars. But as a fan of the genre, I was very excited to hear about the evolution of the genre. I was shocked at how long it took to get to the point. It didn't happen in a straight line, but instead it was a gradual progression. It's a nice movie for fans, but for people who have not seen the TV series, it might be a little bit disappointing.

Sandra Gray photo
Sandra Gray

I'm giving this an extra star because it was totally free. A week before my birthday, my husband and I went to see it and we really enjoyed it. I have to admit, I do enjoy documentaries that are both entertaining and informative, and this film certainly fulfills both of those objectives. The acting is all very good, and the story is very well told, although there are a few small points of confusion, like why didn't they just shoot the guy right in front of the door? I'll let that one slide. The movie is definitely worth seeing, and I think anyone who has any knowledge of the early life of a band should see it. The sad part about this documentary is that I can't help but think that more and more bands are being made by amateurs instead of professionals. I don't mean that in a bad way, because I really like the people who make music, but it's sad to see bands not having the resources and time to get all the people who are going to come and watch the movie and see the pictures, and then having to make the band. It's just sad.

Shirley W. photo
Shirley W.

All this is an eye opener to anyone with a pulse. I am a guy and i'm still living with my mom, my dad is a very sick alcoholic, and my mom, the step mother to the mentally handicapped, has never really been around her mom, and she is getting her life together, and trying to get a job. As a side note to this film, it really would have helped if the movie was released at a more reasonable time, i saw the movie in the theater in 2007, and i thought it was really good, but i was sort of shocked at the end of the movie, that it actually ended, but i really wanted to see the movie for some reason. At the end of the day, you have to see the movie. It is a pretty good documentary about this type of community. It shows how far they've come, and the struggle that they've gone through. I think that it would have been a great film if it would have been released at a time that it would have made more sense. I don't think that it is completely fair to compare this to the video games, because it is not the same, but it is still a good film. It shows you the tough life that these mentally handicapped people have, and how hard it is to live on their own, and just trying to survive.

Sean photo
Sean

I saw this documentary twice at the Toronto Film Festival in 2003, and I still think it's one of the best documentaries I've seen. Even though it's an hour and a half long, it really covers a lot of ground, and is not one of those films that you have to watch again to get the most out of it. If you have the time and want to see a good documentary about the music industry, this is it.

Donna R. photo
Donna R.

If I had to sum up The Video Nasty's entire film career in one word, that word would be "awesome". It's the kind of film that you'll either love or hate. I loved it. It's a little too over the top for some people's tastes. If you're a huge fan of the band, you'll definitely love it. If you're not a fan, it's still a great film to watch. It's definitely worth the $7.50 it costs at the video store, and it's certainly worth the money you'll pay to see it on the big screen. Watch it with an open mind, and you won't be disappointed.

Christina M. photo
Christina M.

This documentary was made for the good of the industry, to show the ups and downs of making movies. It was a much better documentary than the two I saw the night before, both of which were very similar in tone and purpose. I think this film is about the evolution of the movie-going public, and how the new generation has been brought up to be interested in the films they see. A huge part of the growth of this generation has been to look beyond what the movie industry is, and they have discovered the ease of discovery that is now available through the internet. I would like to see the movie to see what is being produced, and I hope to see more of this type of documentary in the future. I think this movie is a good look at how the movie industry has evolved over time. This was a very entertaining and informative documentary, and I am looking forward to seeing more of this type of movie.

Helen Nelson photo
Helen Nelson

I enjoyed this documentary. It was well done and informative. It was a good overview of the history of the movie industry and it was interesting to see how the industry evolved. There were some interesting interviews with film industry veterans. I was especially interested in hearing what some of the women in the industry had to say about their experiences. I would recommend this film to anyone interested in the history of the movie industry.

Christopher photo
Christopher

This documentary is pretty good. In my opinion, it's one of the best documentaries about the rise of independent film-making. It contains some great interviews with some of the biggest names in independent film. It's also an excellent compilation of many interviews with people who worked in film-making. If you're looking for a good documentary that has a lot of interviews with famous people, then this is the documentary for you. The director is, of course, Robert Wise. The documentary shows the rise of independent film-making, and also how it changed the film industry. It's a good overview of the film industry and how the current state of independent film-making is. It's definitely not a documentary that everyone will like, but it's definitely one of the best documentaries I've ever seen about the film industry. I'm definitely going to watch it again. This documentary is worth watching.

Crystal M. photo
Crystal M.

When I first heard about the film, I was expecting it to be some kind of documentary about a forgotten era in film. What I got was an hour and a half of surreal, eye-popping footage of the BFI. The film is a bit of a documentary and is well shot, but the editing is more muddled than a one-legged man. For example, the shots that are supposed to be long-shots, are actually long, seemingly all at once. I was also disappointed that the narration was done by a man who talks a lot. I think it would have been more effective to have the voice-over by someone who knew the subject. I would also have liked to see more detail about how the archive footage was acquired and what was shown to the public. I was also disappointed that the title of the film was "The Midnight Circus" which doesn't really do it justice. As a documentary, I thought it was well done and I'm not sure if the film would have worked as well if it had been titled something else. I also thought the title was confusing. I would have preferred to see the film titled "The Midnight Circus: The Birth of the Film Noir" but I guess we can't have everything. But the film is very good and I recommend it.

Austin photo
Austin

This documentary takes a look at the history of Hollywood and how it has been affected by the influence of Hollywood itself. The film begins with a brief introduction of the film industry as a whole and then moves on to the most influential directors and actors in the industry and how they have changed the industry. The interviews are quite interesting and this film is not so much about the director and actors as it is about the industry as a whole. The producers are the ones responsible for the downfall of the studios and many directors have commented on how the producers have ruined the industry. This film is quite interesting and interesting to see some of the real life stories of how the studios had turned into something that has been largely forgotten. The movie is quite depressing to watch but the interview with Roger Ebert really gives you a different perspective of Hollywood. The film really does try to explain the industry in a factual way but unfortunately it does a bad job. The producers seem to want to show off about how much they have changed the industry but the reality is that the industry was completely different and they have changed nothing. The problem is that the industry was built on the backs of many great directors and actors who have not been remembered as much. The film really is a good one but it's not a documentary that has the greatest reach.

Jacqueline photo
Jacqueline

Michael Moore's documentary is about his attempt to get a serial killer in prison. He tried to get John Phillips (Steve Buscemi) to confess his crimes in a film. Phillips is a serial killer and he confessed in a documentary. When he was released from prison he went on the news and said he was never involved with this film. So Michael Moore tries to get Phillips to talk about the film. This documentary is very interesting and I think it's very hard to understand. It's like a mystery. When you see the film you have no idea what is going on. It's really hard to understand. I give it a 7 out of 10. I think it's good.

Heather P. photo
Heather P.

If you are a fan of Roger Corman, you will love this film. Roger Corman is famous for making horror movies, so we can expect this to be a lot like his earlier films. However, this movie is much more about the history of the studio and Roger Corman and their role in it. I was pleasantly surprised to see so many good interviews with people who worked at the studio. I particularly liked interviews with Peter Cushing, the director of The Big Red One and a very interesting conversation between him and Roger Corman. One thing I did not understand was the length of the movie, I thought it was a bit too long. However, I also did not know who the people who worked for Roger Corman were, so I was hoping the movie would answer some questions I had about them. In the end, I was very happy with the way this film ended, it was very enjoyable and worth watching. 7/10.

Dennis J. photo
Dennis J.

A documentary about the way Hollywood deals with the British working class is an intriguing idea. Unfortunately, the documentary itself is almost a disaster. The documentary is delivered with a lot of promise, but sadly it's too derivative and too lightweight. The documentary is divided into three main sections, "Cinema" and "Film" and "Social" and "Performance". The first half of the documentary is actually the best part, because it features an interview with several famous British actors and actresses. I really enjoyed this part of the film, as it clearly shows the high level of respect the British actors have for the British working class. The second half of the documentary is simply dull, because it doesn't have anything to say about the working class, and it doesn't have any interviews with the director. The third section of the documentary is really the worst part. It is the one that seems to be the main focus of the documentary and it is the most offensive. The filmmaker interviews people who claim to be an actor, director or cinematographer and they describe their favourite movies. Unfortunately, it seems that these people don't really know how to be objective and do not know how to present the movie in the best way. They only have two features on their CV: "I am the director" and "I am the director's friend". The interviewees seem to know nothing about the film industry, they are just pretentious people who just want to talk about their favourite movies and their favourite directors. They do not really know anything about what they are talking about and they don't seem to care about anything that they say. The second thing that is totally offensive is the way the director is interviewed. He is interviewed by a non-actor and an amateur actor, and the amateur actor clearly doesn't know anything about the film industry, he is just a silly guy who doesn't know what he is talking about. This is just really bad and it's hard to believe that anyone would actually listen to this kind of interview. The film is actually quite good and I would recommend watching it if you get the chance, but it is not worth your time.

Hannah photo
Hannah

I really enjoyed the film, however, I felt that there was a bit of overacting and melodrama to the film. They should have focused more on the real life events that took place, instead of trying to paint the entire movie as a picture of the war in Vietnam. They should have focused more on the changing relationship between the two main characters. The film was not shot with a POV camera. It was shot through a smart phone and it was interesting to see how the camera tracked their relationship and the other Vietnamese people around them. They were really good at not showing any of the violence and killing and all of the blood. They would have been better to show the actual scenes and show what happened. The film was very slow at times and some scenes were quite confusing. However, I did enjoy the film and I recommend watching it.

Lori K. photo
Lori K.

An essential documentary on the making of classic 70's and 80's horror movies. The film is very informative, and offers enough back story to make it very interesting. While the acting of the two actors playing the lead roles is excellent, the other actors are not as strong. The director uses only a handful of sound bites to set the tone of the movie, and his use of the film stock used in the 70's is excellent. The film has very few plot holes, and the cast members play their roles very well. It was also interesting to see how the filmmakers used classic horror movie music in their movie. It makes a great soundtrack to any horror movie. I definitely recommend this film for anyone who is a fan of classic horror movies.

Cynthia Owens photo
Cynthia Owens

I think it's pretty cool that people are going to see this movie for different reasons. Some people like to see a different point of view, some people are just curious and want to know more about the subject. Personally, I enjoyed it a lot. I think it's a good movie to watch, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes movies about underground culture. It's pretty interesting to see how the underground scene came to be, and how it changed over time. The movie is pretty interesting to watch, and it's also interesting to hear the stories of the people who made it. I think it's a good movie to watch if you want to know more about the underground scene, or if you're curious about it. I think it's a pretty good movie to watch if you're interested in the underground scene.

Pamela Owens photo
Pamela Owens

It is never easy to start a new project and without any time to prepare, a film like this may prove to be a disaster. That's the case with the remake of the film, where the director and writer of the original Michael Hoffman chose to rewrite the movie in order to appeal to the younger generation. That's why the story of "A Streetcar Named Desire" is not exactly the same as the original film. The plot is also not exactly the same, the characters are not exactly the same, and so on. The main reason why I enjoyed watching this movie was because it was a great opportunity to see Michael Hoffman and his amazing story telling skills. I did not like the film, but the good thing is that it is not about the story itself. It is about the storytelling and the directing. That is the reason why I still think it is an interesting movie. The film is great, but the problem is that it is not the same.

Terry photo
Terry

The documentary 'Fashion: What The F.C.C. Did Wrong' is a fantastic and hilarious look at the world of fashion. It's an entertaining look at the world of fashion and the stories of some of the most famous people involved. I've always loved the 'story of the dress', because it is such an incredible and important part of the fashion industry, and the film brings us back to that time and shows us what happened before the fashion world got its start. It's a bit dry, but the characters are all fascinating. We get to see the same people from all the time that they have been, so we get to know them as individuals and what makes them who they are. You get to see how the fashion industry is a huge influence in everything from politics to society. It gives a look on the things that make the fashion world what it is and the things that make it different from other industries. This is a very interesting documentary and it's a must see for all those who love fashion. I would definitely recommend this documentary to anyone who loves fashion and loves documentaries.

Theresa R. photo
Theresa R.

A reviewer here described the movie as 'more than just a boring look at a decade of glamourous history', and I'm not sure about that, but there are many films about the period that are far more entertaining. I'd say this film is more about the glamour of the period than the actual history, and so it's not the best film about the period. It's not quite the worst film, but it's not the best either. There are some great bits of this film that have become a bit dated, the key one being the 'green light' scene. I remember this being shown at the time, and the images of the green light scene are still hilarious today. It is one of the many great bits of the film, but for the most part, it's not very good. The rest of the film is very short and is very little in the way of information. It's also quite slow at times, and the film is not at all enjoyable. It's worth watching for the cinematography and the music, but if you're looking for a film about the period, you might be better off looking elsewhere.

William photo
William

This documentary on the life of the legendary actor and director John Huston is a fascinating look at a man who is often underrated in history. It is a bit like a "Who's Who" of Hollywood, and it is full of fascinating facts, interviews, and fascinating anecdotes. The movie is well worth seeing. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in John Huston, or film, or history.

Donald F. photo
Donald F.

This is the first documentary I have ever seen that focuses on the cult of Scientology, and I'm glad I watched it. I was not expecting anything as I didn't want to know anything about it, but I was surprised by the depth and breadth of the film. It's a must-see for anyone interested in Scientology, or anyone who wants to learn more about it. The film is very informative and well-made, and it is very entertaining to watch. The interviews are mostly with people who are ex-Scientologists, and they are very insightful and interesting. The film is also very well-made, and the photography is very good. The film is a great introduction to Scientology, and I recommend it to anyone interested in it.

Gloria photo
Gloria

When I saw this movie, I was like, "Wow, that was a pretty good movie." I mean, I was expecting the movie to be very entertaining and fun, but it wasn't. I didn't think it was that entertaining, I thought it was pretty boring. It was like, "Hey, look, we have a movie where we have the same old thing going on over and over again, but it's still entertaining." I think it was the same thing over and over again. The thing that made me like the movie was the characters. The main character was really cool, the other characters were really cool, and they had great chemistry with each other. I think it was a really good movie. It was a fun movie, but it wasn't that entertaining.

Ethan P. photo
Ethan P.

This is a documentary on the production of the film, "A Sound of Thunder". It tells the story of how the film was made, and how it changed the world. It also shows how the actors and crew made the film and the magic behind it. The cast includes: Clint Eastwood, Kevin Costner, Clint Howard, Billy Bob Thornton, Sam Elliot, Bill Paxton, Peter Boyle, David Morse, David Strathairn, and Stanley Tucci. The story of the film is about how the film was made, and how it changed the world. It also tells how the cast and crew made the film and the magic behind it. The cast includes: Clint Eastwood, Kevin Costner, Clint Howard, Clint Howard, Billy Bob Thornton, Sam Elliot, Bill Paxton, Peter Boyle, David Strathairn, and Stanley Tucci.

Phillip photo
Phillip

I watched this documentary on the PBS network last night. I thought it was a very good documentary. It was interesting to see the historical context of the film and how the filmmakers made the documentary. The documentaries that were made about the subjects of the movie were also very interesting to see. It was interesting to see how the filmmakers had to make the documentary. The documentary was very informative and I would recommend it to anyone who has an interest in the subject of the movie. I would recommend this movie to anyone who has an interest in the subject of the movie. I would also recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see how a documentary is made.

Douglas photo
Douglas

I was a fan of the original 70's film "The Muppet Movie", and I've seen "The Muppet Movie: A Celebration" several times. It's a great tribute to the Muppet Show, and it's great to see a documentary about the making of the film. I was surprised that it was only 85 minutes long, and that it was edited so well. The documentary was shot with the same handheld camera style that was used for the film. The only downside is that it's hard to tell where the movie ends and the Muppet Show begins. The Muppet Show never ended, and it never would have been possible to film the entire show. It's hard to tell where the movie ends and the show begins, and that's what makes it so great. If you have any interest in the Muppet Show, this documentary is a must-see. It's not a documentary for the faint of heart, but it's a must-see for fans of the Muppet Show.

Nancy photo
Nancy

I'm a huge fan of Roger Ebert, and I was very excited to see this documentary. It was definitely worth the price of admission. There are some great interviews with the cast and crew, and some great behind-the-scenes footage. It's also a great look at the art of making a film. I especially liked the interviews with director Peter Hyams, who talks about the challenges of making a film in the 1970s. I also enjoyed the story of the making of the film, and the process of making a film. I think this is a great documentary, and it's a must-see for anyone who loves Roger Ebert.

Gloria Lane photo
Gloria Lane

This documentary was a great read for anyone who's ever had a dream or dreamer. It's a great look into the lives of people who are still trying to live their lives. I've been a fan of Jeff Koons since the first time I saw his work, and this documentary was a great read for anyone who wants to know more about his work. The documentary is great because it shows us the work and the process of making his work. It's very clear that he loves his work and he does it for the love of it. He has an incredible sense of humor and his work is very entertaining. It's great to see that he doesn't have to worry about what people think about his work. It's a great read and it's a great documentary.

Joyce W. photo
Joyce W.

I have just watched this film for the first time, and I must say that I am pleasantly surprised. It is an insightful and well-written documentary that goes into the lives of the people who made the movies, and how they lived. It does not go into the technical aspects of making movies, but rather the people involved. I was very surprised that this was not a 'found footage' type film, and it is more of a documentary than a documentary. It does a great job of showing the lives of the people who made the films, and how they lived. I highly recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good documentary.