فيلم Advocate

Advocate

Advocate is a movie starring Mahmoud Abbas, Udi Adiv, and Hanan Ashrawi. A look at the life and work of Jewish-Israeli lawyer Lea Tsemel who has represented political prisoners for nearly 50 years.

Other Titles
Adwokatka, Eldsjälen, Defensora, Advokat i Israel, 魔鬼辯護人, Lea Tsemel, avocate, Lea Tsemel, Orehet Din, Lea Tsemel, Anwältin
Running Time
1 hours 54 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Documentary
Director
Philippe Bellaiche, Rachel Leah Jones
Writer
Rachel Leah Jones
Actors
Tareq Barghout, Udi Adiv, Hanan Ashrawi, Mahmoud Abbas
Country
Canada, Israel, Switzerland
Year
2019
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A look at the life and work of Jewish-Israeli lawyer Lea Tsemel who has represented political prisoners for nearly 50 years.

Comments about documentary «Advocate» (15)

Roy photo
Roy

In a dark, desolate alleyway, a woman in a wheelchair gives birth to a baby boy. The woman is a convicted murderer who had been sentenced to death for the murder of her husband, but was executed by lethal injection. The baby is placed in the care of a social worker and he adopts the boy as his own. It is a depressing and depressing documentary. The social worker is so boring that I wanted to watch it all the way through. I found the social worker's wife to be completely unsympathetic. Her husband had committed a crime and was executed, yet the social worker's wife gives birth to a child and is horrified by the baby's arrival. Why the hell should I care about this woman and her baby? And why should I care about her husband? It was all so depressing and stupid. It was also extremely boring. I would have preferred to see a story about how the baby was born, how the social worker's wife reacted to it, and how the baby got adopted. And why was the baby placed in the care of a social worker, if I don't care about the social worker's wife? I also didn't care about the social worker's wife's husband, because I didn't care about him. The social worker's wife seemed to be in charge of the baby and that's it. It was also extremely boring and I didn't care about the baby at all. Overall, this movie was not great. I don't recommend it to anyone.

Nancy Ward photo
Nancy Ward

I'm a fan of the HBO series The Wire and The Corner. I saw this documentary because I was curious about the drug problem in America, and how they dealt with it. The doc is worth a watch, but be prepared to see some scenes that are not very flattering to those who have to deal with drug dealing. They do a good job of telling the story without showing the negative side of the drug problem.

Billy photo
Billy

A very honest look at the life of a single mom and her kids. I was quite shocked at the content, as I am a single mom and a single dad. I was also very surprised that a single mom would be so good at what she does. This documentary was very well done, and I enjoyed it very much. I'm glad I watched it, and I recommend it to anyone who has or will have a single parent. I also think it's important to be open to the idea that you may be better off raising your kids alone.

Vincent B. photo
Vincent B.

While the movie is well-done, the film itself is lacking. The argument is built up as an argument for an environmental agenda, but there are no examples to back up the argument. There are, however, some good points, such as the fact that the producers of the film are also producers of the book. It is not clear to me why this film is not on cable. It is a good film, but I would have preferred a bit more background information.

Betty Estrada photo
Betty Estrada

A lawyer tells the story of a young man who has lost his brother in a car accident. He struggles to find the young man's father and his brother's father, and tries to help the father and brother deal with the loss. The lawyer is a fictional person, but the story of the boy is a real person who lives in the same neighborhood. It is not a movie that makes the viewer feel sad or feel a connection to the viewer. It is a movie that gets to the heart of the viewer. I am a big fan of this movie, and it is a very personal story. It is a great movie that I highly recommend.

Dylan S. photo
Dylan S.

I'm sure you can guess where I'm going with this, but I'm going to say it anyway. There are some great insights and observations from the director and the producer. I really liked the way that the filmmaker talked about the topic of the director's background, his current work and the struggles he was going through. The documentary really brought some interesting insights into the film's subject matter. I liked that the director talked about the differences between the actors, the directors, and the camera operators. The filmmaker also talked about his own feelings about being an actor and how he had to work on different aspects of acting. The documentary really made me feel like I was in the film, and I really enjoyed it. It was interesting to hear from a filmmaker who really had a very clear vision about his work and the different aspects of acting. It was also interesting to hear about the different aspects of the director's work, such as the directing, the production, the writing, and the editing. The documentary really made me feel like I was there and I really enjoyed the film. It was a really nice experience to hear about a film that I really liked. I really liked that the documentary really brought some really interesting insights and observations into the topic of the film's subject matter.

David photo
David

I think the most interesting thing about this film is how they present the effects of the war on the German people. I think the propaganda machine was a big part of the effort, the politicians were very clever, and they tried to make people think that the Germans were the good guys and the Jews were the bad guys. This is why there is a lot of anti-Semitism in the film. I think there are some interesting and deep observations about the propaganda machine in this film, and the power of the German people to control the world. The most interesting part of the film is the "street interviews" with the people who were involved in the war. The interviews are sometimes very boring, but this is a good way to get an idea of the German people's attitude toward the war. One thing that surprised me was how many Germans thought that the Jews were the bad guys. I'm not sure if this was the case, but it is definitely worth seeing. I think the movie is well done, and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the topic.

Juan photo
Juan

While I personally enjoy the videos that Jason Kint are in, and especially the ones that he has done on the original show, this documentary is not for me. It's very well done, with some interesting things, but nothing too special or unique. What really got to me, though, was the "chilling" scenes of the final scene with the man with the huge scar on his face. It was really disturbing, and almost made me laugh. Overall, though, it's not a documentary that I would recommend to anyone, except maybe to fans of the show. However, I would still recommend the movie, because it is still pretty good. If you want to see a movie that you don't have to think about, watch this one.

Cheryl W. photo
Cheryl W.

I found this film to be very enlightening. I don't know the details of the story, but I do know that it was a good, albeit unrealistic, attempt at a documentary. What I do know is that I think it is important to keep an open mind to this movie, and not take it too seriously. It is not meant to be a documentary, but a very entertaining story about a professional poker player. There is a lot of information here, so I recommend that you read the back of the DVD and then watch the movie. If you have watched the movie, you may have noticed that there are a few scenes that are very reminiscent of the movie "American Graffiti", and I believe this was intentional. I don't know if this is intentional or not, but it just felt like the two films were connected somehow. It's not a good movie, but it is an entertaining movie. You may not be a poker player, but if you do enjoy a good, entertaining story, then I recommend this movie.

Patricia C. photo
Patricia C.

This movie was very good. I saw it with my brother who's been in jail for some time. I had no idea what this movie was about and was pleasantly surprised. It's a bit depressing and depressing but it's all part of the film. It was very interesting and gave you a look into what it's like to be in prison. I was able to connect with the characters very easily and I thought it was very well done. I really recommend this movie.

Keith Coleman photo
Keith Coleman

First of all, this movie was very well done. As I was watching it, I kept thinking, "What was that all about?" I really didn't care for the content, I just wanted to see it end. There was no moral, no real message. It was just a movie about sex, and all the different things that go with it. So if you are looking for a movie to tell you how you should live your life, then I'd definitely recommend this one. If you want to see it for entertainment purposes, then I'd suggest that you stay away. I'm not a prude by any means, but I would say this is one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. I'm not saying it was boring to the point of being uninteresting, but the movie was so boring, I was just waiting for something to happen. Like it was supposed to be entertaining, but the characters weren't interesting. I just didn't care for any of them. I was just waiting for something to happen, and it didn't happen. I just wanted to get the movie over with. It was a really, really boring movie, and I wish it was over, so I could get some sleep. I definitely would not recommend this movie to anyone.

Jeremy photo
Jeremy

I'm a big fan of the late great Harvey Weinstein, and I was disappointed with this documentary. The main complaint I heard from viewers was that Weinstein was "nervous" during his interviews. That is true. Weinstein is a very nervous person, and he's a nervous interviewee. This was one of those rare occasions where I think the producers and Weinstein missed a key opportunity to tell a story that didn't have a happy ending. Weinstein's show was a total disaster. What I mean by that is that he didn't tell the truth about his life. I have seen him in other documentaries and he's never been on camera. I don't know if he was filming the interviews or if he was lying, but I never felt like he was on camera. His interviewees are usually very well-informed and his interviews were made up. For example, I never really saw the negative effect that the death of his brother had on him. I never saw that he was a "brilliant" business man. I never saw him as someone who was "the smartest man in the room". I saw him as someone who was trying to get what he wanted and to get it, he was very nervous. That's the only thing I saw him as. He had no problem lying, but he didn't want to lie. He wanted to be the best interviewer he could be and tell the truth. The interviews are not very interesting. I've never seen a documentary where I've seen the interviewees talk about something that happened to them in their lives. I've never seen a documentary where I've seen the interviewees talk about something that happened to them. They're talking about things that happened in their lives, and they don't talk about things that happened in the interviews. It's like they're trying to make it all up. I saw this documentary for the interviewees. Harvey Weinstein is a very interesting man, but his interviewees are really boring. I think this documentary could have been a lot better. It's a shame because the people who made this documentary had a great opportunity to tell a great story. I'm sure the documentary makers would have been better off if they had not told the story of Weinstein. There's a lot of good material that they could have used, and they could have also told the story of Michael Douglas or Dustin Hoffman. All of these guys are brilliant actors, but they don't talk about their interviews. They don't talk about the interviewees. They don't talk about the material they've worked with. I'd rather see the interviews and see them in their context, because they're great. But I don't think that the interviews were the focus of the documentary. I think that the documentary should have been about Harvey Weinstein. I've seen his interviewees talk about how great his show was, but I never saw them talk about the interviewees. I didn't see the interviews at all. I think the interviewees were very good, but they weren't interviewed. The documentary was

Julie Anderson photo
Julie Anderson

A young doctor, Tony-Paul (Chris Cooper), is sent to the US to work at a research institute. During his stay, he is treated by a number of young women. He is a perfect fit for their needs and becomes a much sought after boyfriend. However, as his romantic relationship with one of the women becomes more and more romantic, his feelings for her turn more and more romantic. Tony-Paul is a good film. The first half of the film is a lot of fun. The acting is very good, and the film is shot beautifully. It is definitely worth watching. However, as the film progresses, the tension begins to wane. There are several points where the film becomes a bit too predictable. Also, the film is not particularly original. The only reason I can think of for the film being rated so highly is the positive reviews. However, there are a few minor problems with the film. For one, the film is filmed in black and white. This is a bit annoying and the film feels slightly too long. Another minor problem is the ending. The film is quite predictable. There is no way you could predict the ending. However, the film is not entirely predictable. In fact, there are some twists that you might not expect. Overall, this is a good film. The acting is excellent, the direction is very good, and the film is very good at capturing the mood of the times. However, the film is not a very good film. 7/10

Ann Hoffman photo
Ann Hoffman

This film is about a female lawyer who becomes involved in a case that could be a landmark in the legal profession and ends up in prison. In prison, she meets a fellow inmate and an inmate friend and they form a friendship and, in the end, they share the same interest in a woman who's on death row. The film is structured around the prison-inmate relationship and in the course of this film, the inmates have to deal with the issues of women's rights, female suicide, the death penalty and the judicial system. The film is very informative and informative is what the film is about, but the film doesn't go beyond that. The film doesn't explain the causes of these issues, doesn't explain the ramifications of the law in the real world and doesn't show the real world results of the law. This film is good for learning about the judicial system and the history of women's issues in the legal system. The film has a good documentary style to it and the characters are portrayed well. I think the acting is very good and I think the film is a very good documentary style documentary. I think this is the best documentary I've seen and it's well worth seeing.

Janice Reynolds photo
Janice Reynolds

I really enjoyed this documentary. The film tells a story of the current state of affairs in the Philippines, as well as the current problems facing the country. The story follows a small group of students and teachers at a school in a slum neighborhood in Manila. They are not known to the outside world, and are treated like second-class citizens. The documentary also tells the story of a group of homeless children in Manila who are being forced to leave their homes by the government. The film is very well-made and the interviewees are very passionate and sincere. This is a must-see documentary for anyone who wants to understand the current state of affairs in the Philippines. 7/10