فيلم De kinderen van juf Kiet

De kinderen van juf Kiet

De kinderen van juf Kiet is a movie starring Kiet Engel, Haya Khleif, and Branche Jovanovski. Immigrant children have to find their way in a new classroom, with a new teacher and a language they don't understand. An ode to the...

Other Titles
Miss Kiet's Children, Neiti Kietin lapset, キッツ先生の子供たち, Fröken Kiets barn
Running Time
1 hours 55 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Documentary
Director
Petra Lataster-Czisch, Peter Lataster
Writer
Petra Lataster-Czisch
Actors
Kiet Engel, Leanne Yahyaowi, Haya Khleif, Branche Jovanovski
Country
Netherlands
Year
2016
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Immigrant children have to find their way in a new classroom, with a new teacher and a language they don't understand. An ode to the teacher every child deserves.

Comments about documentary «De kinderen van juf Kiet» (19)

Danielle photo
Danielle

I know this is a documentary but I was surprised to see the names and the faces of so many people in the film. In fact, it was quite a surprise to see so many people in this film. If you don't know who is in it, it's because it's not something you would be able to look up. I thought the film was rather funny and quite enjoyable. It was kind of like a documentary of the nightlife of Amsterdam but instead of all the people doing drugs, it was people doing drugs. That's what I liked about it. If you go to Amsterdam, you can see that many people are doing drugs but they don't all do it that way. It's not all that big a problem. If you're looking for a documentary about Amsterdam, this is not the one. It's more like a documentary of the nightlife of Amsterdam. If you are looking for a documentary about Amsterdam, I would suggest you look up the documentary "Allehanden om de bijd". It's a documentary about Amsterdam nightlife but it's about Amsterdam nightlife in a different way. It's about Amsterdam nightlife in the 90s and that's not what I found this film about.

Julia P. photo
Julia P.

This is the story of the Dutch Masters in the 1960s and the disastrous consequences that followed for their families and society. The Dutch Masters have been a subject of public fascination since the 1970s, as the Dutch invented their own language, the Dutch Masters' Academy. The Dutch Masters were the subject of a play that was based on the life of the Dutch Masters, so the story has been taken and told many times. The film follows the lives of the Dutch Masters and their families, and it is a fascinating and often fascinating story. The acting is good, the production values are good, and the story is gripping. The Dutch Masters are portrayed as the most respected people in their society, and their story has been told many times. This is the story that makes the Dutch Masters fascinating. The film is also well-filmed, with great camera work and the editing is very good. I found the director's commentary very interesting, and I think it is a great piece of film-making.

Henry photo
Henry

This documentary is a must see for anyone who has ever worked in a textile factory or has ever been on a job that was dominated by a boss, whether they are current or former. The documentary is about the last day of work at the infamous Port Loko factory in Thailand, where the life of a factory worker was almost turned upside down. With a cast of some of the world's best known actors, the film focuses on the lives of the workers, their families, and their hopes and dreams. The film is filled with wonderful footage of the work environment, the workers, and the boss, and features interviews with former workers, former bosses, and former employees. I was really impressed with the director's ability to show the human side of the situation, and it's a really easy to watch film, with very little dialog, and a very short running time. I would definitely recommend this to anyone who is interested in the lives of the workers and how they are treated by their employers.

Victoria Davidson photo
Victoria Davidson

This is the first film I have seen from Dutch director Wim Wenders. I found it to be an interesting film, which I found in general more enjoyable than the many other films that I have seen recently. Wenders has a particular style, which I found to be very unique, although I didn't find it quite as special as some people claim. I found this film to be well-made, and I believe that the director's style was very unique. The editing was also very well-done, and the music and sound effects were excellent. The acting was also very good, and the direction was very good. Overall, I found this to be a very good film, but I found it to be a bit more enjoyable than most other films I have seen recently. I would recommend this film to people who enjoy the style of Wenders, as it is a very different style of film.

Timothy White photo
Timothy White

An interesting documentary from a Netherlands documentary maker, this one is from 2005. It is a look at how a group of Dutch teens (most of whom are 15-17) deal with life and death situations. It is very interesting and at times very depressing, but I think that this is part of the point. The filmmakers really take the time to get to know these teens, and the film is quite revealing. It is more like an interview than a documentary. I think it is very important to take the time to know these people, and not just to show what they look like or what they do, because you can never really know what they are really like. The film is extremely well made, with some very nice interviews and a lot of good shots. The film does take a long time to get going, and is probably not as effective as it could be. I would recommend this to anyone who is interested in how Dutch teens deal with life and death situations, or if you are an expert on teen suicide or drug problems.

Martha photo
Martha

This documentary, which is in Dutch, is about a Dutch director, Jan de Groot, who was in fact a freelance director for many years. His film, "A Kind of Magic" (2002) is about a young man in the Netherlands, Paul Kiet, who was addicted to porn and was suffering from depression. After several years of searching for a cure, Paul was prescribed medication by a doctor, and the drug started to work. In the end, the effects of the drug were so powerful that Paul was no longer able to handle it. The film is based on the personal experiences of Paul, and it is interesting to see how the story was told in a way that is both insightful and funny. It also shows the Dutch police trying to find out the truth about Paul's history. The film is very entertaining and it is a pity that the Dutch police did not want to prosecute the man because he was a porn star. I have seen this documentary twice and I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in the subject of pornography. The story is worth hearing.

Ruth photo
Ruth

In the '80s, the Dutch filmmakers at Kiet Zaan (and later the Dutch film industry) did an incredible job. A film like Vliegende Kiet (In the Territory of Love) or the classic Dutch Films from the '70s (e.g. The Road and Gevoehrige van de wel), would not have been possible without the director at the helm. But what would have made this kind of films the best in Dutch film history would have been the director's artistic vision. Kiet Zaan (the first and the last) was a monumental achievement. In this documentary, the filmmaker is very open about his personal life and his struggle with depression. He talks about the difficulties of being a director in a Dutch society, about the emotions he had to deal with while making his films, about the problems of getting a film made, about how to keep the production going and the obstacles he faced. His comments are often very moving. His filmography is amazing. But what makes this documentary so powerful is the way it has been translated into English. The English version was so wonderful that it gave a real sense of the style of the film. It is a very different film from the Dutch version. The English version is also very good. It gives a feeling of the times in which the film was made. The English version is much more interesting and much more human. It is a very interesting film. The Dutch version, although it has its own style, is a very good film. And the film is also very human, which makes it much more human than the English version. It is a very good film.

Emily photo
Emily

I never thought I would say this, but I think it would be good if this movie had a trailer. It is a pretty interesting documentary, and it is good to know that it is about animals rather than about humans. But, as it is, it is not that good. I think the trailer would have been better, and it would have been much better if the trailer showed the animals. The movie is a little bit better than the trailer, but not that much better. The movie is pretty boring and you will not be very interested in it. I think the movie would be better if the trailer had been better, because I think it would have made the movie much better. The movie is not very good. I don't think it is a good documentary. It is not that good.

Victoria G. photo
Victoria G.

I'll give it a 7 for the documentary aspect of this movie. I've seen a lot of documentaries and thought it was an average documentary. It is not bad, but I would have liked to see more about the people involved in this project. The one thing that I liked about this movie is the variety of the people who worked on the project. From the small, to the big names. All of them were interesting to see. One thing I really didn't like was the narration of the director. It seemed to me like they were saying too much. I also felt that the documentary was too long. In a way it felt like a documentary about a long documentary. I thought that it was a good movie and would recommend it to anyone. I give this a 7 out of 10.

Amy W. photo
Amy W.

If you are an avid movie watcher, I think you'll find this a very interesting documentary. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to take a look at this film as I found it very difficult to sit through it. The documentary is not very in-depth, it's more of a documentary about a lot of movies. The documentary is not very interesting, I think. I think if you're a movie fan, you'll probably like this film. It's a documentary about a lot of movies. I think the documentary is a little boring, but I think you'll find it interesting, I think.

Rebecca photo
Rebecca

The truth about the war in Syria is one of the most important stories to be told. The story of children who have been affected by the war is a powerful one and it is this story that is being told. One of the main themes in this film is that of the impact of war on children. It shows the true horrors of the war and how children are being affected. This film has a strong message about the need to end the war in Syria and to stop the destruction of Syria and its people. It shows the terrible damage the war has caused to children and the destruction of their lives. The film has a strong message and it is very powerful. It is a powerful film that is a must see.

Christina Cook photo
Christina Cook

I've always been a fan of John McEwan's work, and this documentary is a treat to watch. The director uses the camera to give us a great look at how the people in his films view their work, and the result is something quite unique. I don't think I've ever seen a documentary like this before. It's not a documentary about the making of a movie, it's a documentary about how a movie is made. The subject matter is so important that I would say it's a must see for anyone who loves movies. The documentary is divided into two parts, the first focusing on McEwan's childhood, and the second on his early years in film school. Both of these sections are fascinating, and it's interesting to see how the director had to deal with the personal and professional issues of his work. There are some great interviews with actors, and the film is very well edited. It's a film you should definitely see.

Victoria photo
Victoria

I just got back from watching the first showing of "Dijon Day", and I must say it was a really good film. The most of the characters are really likable, and the director is able to really get the point across without really making you feel too much of a sense of fear or unease. The only downside to the film was the fact that some of the acting was rather poor. For example, one of the characters was talking about his first love, and the director cuts to a different scene with the same character. It's a minor thing, but it's still a very minor thing. The acting overall is good, and I think this is a film that you should definitely check out.

Joyce F. photo
Joyce F.

This is a good documentary. It doesn't really cover all the topics in detail but it does offer some great stories. I thought the movie was very interesting. It showed that there are so many different stories, people from different countries and so on. It also showed that when one people doesn't feel like taking a stand, someone else does. I think it was very interesting. It was also interesting that the documentary was made by a person who actually knew many of the people in the documentary. It was also interesting that it was made in the Netherlands. It also showed that many people were very proud of this documentary because it was made in their country. The people who were interviewed were very proud of this documentary. Overall, I thought it was very good. I also liked the fact that it was made in the Netherlands. Overall, I recommend this movie.

Ashley Gray photo
Ashley Gray

The Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh (Zoolander, The Grey, The Double) and his wife Inge (Bubble, The Girl Who Played With Fire) are often compared to other filmmakers of the 20th century, particularly the French brothers Georges and Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Their films are very stylized and focused on subjects that are often very human. In The Double, Theo's film, the director focuses on the relationship between a man and his dog, and the way the dog changes his personality. Theo has a habit of filming when he is asleep, and he will film his dog when he is awake. The camera zooms in and out of the dog's face. This is done so that you can get a sense of the dog's personality. The dog is so interesting and so real that you can't help but be interested in the film. In the scene where Theo is filming the dog, he is asleep and the camera zooms in on the dog's face and he becomes the man that Theo sees in his dreams. Theo sees the dog as a man, and the dog becomes Theo. It is almost as if the dog is giving Theo a personality change. Theo becomes so fascinated with the dog that he tries to film it and get as close as he can to it. When Theo films his dog, he is in a bedroom with his wife and his dog is asleep. Theo is sleeping and he cannot get close to the dog. Theo asks the dog to come to him. The dog is asleep and Theo is sleeping. Theo is not very far from the dog. Theo thinks that the dog is a woman, and the dog becomes a woman. Theo, as a man, is attracted to the dog and his wife is attracted to Theo. The film is a study of the relationship between man and dog. Theo films his dog as a man and the dog becomes Theo. Theo is fascinated by his dog. Theo is not a very good film maker. The film is a little long and the film is mostly in Dutch. The film is good, but it could have been much better. I recommend it to people who enjoy the French or German directors. I recommend it to people who like films about dogs.

Donna photo
Donna

If you're looking for a simple, but effective, way to help educate yourself about the impact of the tobacco industry on the health of the American people, this film is for you. It's really quite remarkable how much of the tobacco industry's work was hidden from the public. This documentary is quite fascinating, and should be required viewing for anyone who wants to know more about the tobacco industry and its role in the health of the American people.

Johnny photo
Johnny

The story of a Dutch-American filmmaker and the lives of his family, friends and co-workers. The film does a good job of showing the variety of Dutch-American people in a short period of time. I especially liked the interviews with family members, who had some funny stories and perspectives. The film has a nice documentary feel, although I do not think the film is perfect. The only thing that I did not like was the editing, which is not always very clear. The main problem is that the film does not make you feel like you are really in Amsterdam, especially at the beginning. I think this is the film's biggest flaw. The best part of the film is definitely the interviews with the family members. The film also has some nice features, such as the small amount of actors, the interviews with Dutch people and the studio, which is very nice and clean. The editing is also good, though sometimes it seems to go on forever. Overall, I would recommend this film to anyone who is interested in Dutch-American life.

Olivia White photo
Olivia White

I'm a real fan of Jon Krakauer's books and this film is a must see for anyone who is a fan of his work. In this film, he tells us about his life and how he got into journalism, how he became a reporter and how he became a writer. He also explains his motivation for writing this book. This film was the best film I have ever seen. I was very impressed by the cast. It was very easy to follow what they were saying and it was very inspiring to see the interviews with some of the famous people who had an influence on him. The film is very well made, but the film is not for the faint of heart. It is very sad and very disturbing at times. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes documentaries, but if you don't like the subject matter, then this is not the film for you. If you want to see a great documentary, then go see 'Tape'.

Douglas B. photo
Douglas B.

I had the pleasure of seeing this film at the Edinburgh Film Festival. I was impressed by the director's ability to stay in character for the entire film and I thought it was well acted. The characters were interesting and the film flowed well. The story was a bit hard to follow but I don't think it was necessary. It was a nice story about the idea of having an open mind and a kind heart. It was not preachy or sensationalist. The characters were well developed and I was interested in them. I think this is a film for people who are open to new ideas and want to see something different. It's a good movie for people who like to learn and have an open mind. I think it is a good movie for people who are interested in the subject of the film.