فيلم Nana

Nana

Nana is a movie starring Maryla Michalowski-Dyamant, Serena Dykman, and Alice Michalowski. The filmmaker retraces her grandmother's Auschwitz survival story and investigates how her life-long fight against intolerance can be passed...

Running Time
1 hours 40 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
History, War, Documentary
Director
Serena Dykman
Writer
Corentin Soibinet, Serena Dykman, David Breger
Actors
Alice Michalowski, Serena Dykman, Maryla Michalowski-Dyamant
Country
Belgium, USA, Poland
Year
2016
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

The filmmaker retraces her grandmother's Auschwitz survival story and investigates how her life-long fight against intolerance can be passed on to new generations in the 21st century.

Comments about history «Nana» (20)

Katherine Reed photo
Katherine Reed

This documentary about the invasion of Iraq was a landmark event in American history. We watched a documentary on the invasion and the political and military history behind it. The documentary showed us the American public and the world view of America during the times of the invasion. The history was studied, the opinions were discussed and the decisions made. In the documentary, the American people were interviewed and it was also interesting to see the Americans and Iraqis get along and do not think that they are different. The documentary was excellent and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in history or the political events in Iraq. The film itself was narrated by Zachary Quinto and Ben Affleck. It was interesting to see the interviews and the photos and see the scenes of the invasion. The documentary was interesting and worth watching.

Patrick S. photo
Patrick S.

After a long time I am now able to watch a documentary on WWII. This documentary is based on a book called "Nana", written by Herman Melville. This book has many factual errors. For example, the picture of an airplane landing on the beach in Salerno. This picture is the same picture that is shown in the film "The Longest Day". The airplane in the picture is the Luftwaffe's 442nd, one of the most powerful fighters in the world. The rest of the aircraft in the picture is taken from the same inventory as the one in the film. This was also the mistake made by the producers of the film. The film "Nana" was based on the book "Nina", by Dr. Lucien Wallis. The book is a masterpiece, it is the most detailed and fascinating account of the war of the Axis powers. It tells the story of the German fighter pilots during the second world war. The story was written by the young German aviation historian Dr. Walther Ciesla, who went to France to find German pilots. He found them in France, in France and in England. The information he gathered in the French air bases was used in the film "Nana". The producers of the film "Nana" could not make any mistakes. The information in the book was used to create the film "Nana". This film was very well done and worthy of watching. It shows the war in a very positive way. It is an extremely interesting documentary.

Judith B. photo
Judith B.

This is a great documentary about the life of Nana. Nana was a Ukrainian Jewish boy who was sent to Palestine by his family. His family was unable to support him and sent him to an orphanage in Palestine. It was there that Nana met his future wife and became a famous painter. He died at age 38 in 1947. In 1945, he was shot by the Nazi forces, but his body was never found. Nana became a well-known figure in the history of the Jewish people and was revered as a national hero. The documentary begins with a slow-paced documentary about Nana's life. It is very important to me that this is a documentary about Nana. This is not a film about some other person. It is a documentary about Nana. It is a film about the life of a great man who lived his life to the fullest. It is a very important film to me, because Nana was a great man, and he lived a great life.

Joyce B. photo
Joyce B.

The film doesn't really move the plot along as well as it could, but that's only because there is not much of a plot. The film is set in the 1930s, and features interviews with some of the most prominent people in the movie. The film is fascinating because it is in a way not meant to be a documentary, but to give a general overview of the Nazis in WWII. The film also introduces a number of people who did not live through the Holocaust, and their stories are told in great detail. The film also gives a good sense of the personal nature of Hitler and his rise to power. The film gives a lot of weight to the Nazis and the reasons for their rise to power, and it's a very interesting documentary that should be seen by everyone.

Denise Ortiz photo
Denise Ortiz

This is a great documentary, a must see for everyone. From the documentary about the Hungarian Jews to the interviews with people who knew and worked with the prisoners, it is an engaging documentary that is worth watching. The only negative thing I could say about the film is that the music is not quite up to par with the documentary, it is a little too electronic for my tastes, but otherwise, I think it is worth seeing. The documentary ends with a quote from Franklin Delano Roosevelt which is a great summary of what the American people stood for during the war.

Kyle photo
Kyle

The most amazing thing about this movie is the great cast and the fact that it is actually being made. For those of you who don't know what this is, it is the story of a man named Nana. He was a survivor of the war in Nanking, and was seen by many as a hero. The film follows him throughout the war and then the war ends. He then spends his life as a street beggar. The story is told through the documentary films of the war and is one of the most powerful things about this film. The people in this film, including Nana, are amazing. You can see the change in Nana as he goes through the war. The only thing I can say about this film is that it is a really good film. If you are interested in the subject, I would say check this out. It's not a great film, but it is a very good one. The documentary style really helped to tell the story. It is an amazing film.

Phillip D. photo
Phillip D.

This film was the first to be made about the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. It has aged very well and shows the march of the British from the 1950's to the 1970's. There is much information about the political events in South Africa and the political parties. It also shows some of the controversy surrounding the decision to let a group of black students enter a white school. This movie should be shown to people of all ages. I hope the film will be re-released. It is a good film that should be shown to everyone.

Daniel B. photo
Daniel B.

As an avid film buff and independent film maker, I have always enjoyed watching documentaries and the need to understand the world we live in and the people in it. Documentaries are very often misleading and try to be deep and meaningful. I have often felt the need to re-watch or study these to really get to the core of what is important. I think that this film does a very good job of doing that, but it is a very slow, even tedious movie. The stories are simple and too boring to hold my attention. I really could not identify with any of the characters. The few moments when I did catch on to something interesting was when I was watching it, and the movie was half over. The characters are very shallow and the entire storyline is very poor. I understand the purpose of having a documentary, but I think that the story telling of this film is too slow and boring for me.

Kenneth Alvarado photo
Kenneth Alvarado

In terms of storytelling, this movie is top-notch. The story is powerful and the documentary style is well-executed. The various anecdotes are very informative and the story of the Great War is a great inspiration. It is a very important film to anyone who has a passion for history or just appreciates the documentary style. It is a must-see for anyone with a passion for World War II. I am also very impressed with the use of sound in the movie. The sound is very quiet and the sound of explosions and battles is almost non-existent. I don't know how well they have done in the other parts of the movie, but this one has to be one of the best films of the year. Highly recommended. Thank you for the great film.

Theresa C. photo
Theresa C.

Nana was one of the most important events in the liberation of the country from the rule of the Japanese occupation. The liberation of the island of Nana was a watershed in the independence of the Philippines. Nana is a beautifully made film. It's the story of the Filipino's fight for freedom from the Japanese occupiers. While the Japanese are gone, the people of Nana have to fight for their freedom. The problem with this film is that it is a documentary about a historic event. While the film does take a lot of time and attention to detail, it doesn't go into as much depth as the history books would like it to. In my opinion, the film could have done a much better job with a more in depth look into the resistance of the Nana people. The one thing that I would have liked to see is a deeper look into the motivation of the resistance. I would have liked to see some side of the people of Nana who were not represented in the film. Overall, this is a great documentary that you should see. It is a must see film to understand the history of the Nana people.

Gerald P. photo
Gerald P.

I have not seen the original version of Nana, but the movie had a huge impact on me. After seeing the documentary, I was really surprised. I think that the documentary would have been better if they had cut out the unnecessary scenes. I also thought that it would have been better if the audience would have been given a better explanation as to why all the "Buddhist" monks were depicted as "evil" people. As it was, the most important message was that Buddhism is actually a way of life, and that we should be grateful to all the Buddhas and all those who helped them. Overall, it was a very good documentary and definitely worth watching.

Timothy photo
Timothy

One of the best documentaries I've seen. It's a great historical overview of one of the most important periods in the history of the world. A man who did more than anyone to try and get the world to wake up and realize what was going on in the world. I feel that some of the critics are not giving enough credit for the fact that this man actually did make the decision to do something about the situation. You really have to get to know the man and the real reasons for his action, and the fact that he was a coward and did not want to go to war was very well known to his people. His speeches are also very informative. It's a very interesting documentary, you can't not enjoy it. I really hope this is not the end of it, but maybe it will be.

Jane Meyer photo
Jane Meyer

I've seen this film twice already and I loved it! It's a documentary that doesn't make any claim to the authenticity of the real events. I like that it's not a "fluff" piece, but I also really like that it takes no sides. As a documentary it was good, as a piece of cinema it's brilliant!

Margaret Henry photo
Margaret Henry

Having just seen this documentary, I can't help but think of how the French government would have reacted to the situation. But I don't think it would have been as bad as the film portrays. I don't think the film shows the reality of the situation in any particular way, and it doesn't make a case for the Germans. The Germans were not treated as bad as portrayed in the film. In fact, the film presents a very nice view of the situation as the end of the war was approaching, when the Germans finally faced defeat. In my view, the film should be seen as a documentary and not a documentary about the war. The film does not present the Germans in a bad light, but the Germans have been treated in the documentary very differently. The documentary clearly shows the Jews who were being deported, and shows them as human beings who were struggling to survive. In the documentary, the Germans are described as evil people who have no idea of what they were doing, while the Germans portrayed in the film are portrayed as evil people who should be shot. I also don't think that the film presents the French and other Allied leaders in a very favourable light. The film portrays them as only concerned with the success of their mission, and as not caring about the lives of the Jews. I can't help but think that it would have been better if the film showed the Allied leaders in a positive light. I also think that the film is a little too long. In my view, the film could have been shorter. It starts off with a lot of information, and as the film goes on, the information is lessened. Overall, the film was good, but not great. I think the film should have been about two and a half hours long.

Nicholas G. photo
Nicholas G.

I was very surprised by the review on this site. I think it's a good documentary and a good film, and I think that's why it's getting such bad reviews. I thought the people who said this was a 'piece of trash' were either fools or just people who are stupid enough to make such a dumb decision. I thought the film was good. I think that, in fact, the film is one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. The director, Michael Moore, did a great job. It was really good to see him at the time, and I think the world would be a better place today if he hadn't been shot. He was a very important part of the success of the documentary. I think the only thing that I did not like was the movie trailer, which was too short. It is a great documentary and a very good film, and I think that's why it's getting such bad reviews.

Jonathan Snyder photo
Jonathan Snyder

In 1914, the movie "The Great War" is based on the book of the same name by Winston Churchill. The movie tells the story of Winston Churchill and his decision to go into the First World War. It is a very interesting movie, but there are many things that don't make much sense. First of all, I don't know why Churchill made the decision to go into the First World War. At the time, England was already a great nation, and England was a superpower. The entire war was very expensive, but the war was very pointless. The first thing that is missing is the actual text of the film. I was really looking forward to watching this movie. But the book is better. I really really like the book, it's very interesting and full of details. But the movie doesn't show that much. Also, the movie doesn't show Churchill's opinion about the war. It's not really true that he didn't know anything about the war. He was the Prime Minister of Great Britain. I think that if the movie showed his opinion, it would be more interesting and it would make more sense. I don't know what the director wanted to show in the movie, but the movie is still very interesting. It's full of facts and it's very interesting. But I think that the movie could have been better if the text was better.

Betty Wright photo
Betty Wright

As a film student I have never seen the films of Nakoula. After watching his film, I can see why Nakoula is a target for hate from the mainstream. The stories that he's told have been all over the media in the past few days. The stories he tells have been pretty shocking to say the least. He's a member of the so-called Black Muslim Brotherhood, and he claims that he is a natural born leader. He uses people who are not like him to do his dirty work. He says that they are getting better at what they do. He said that they will all have their day in the sun and everyone will be a winner. But in his movie, the good guys are the ones who win the day. His director, Paul Greengrass, is also quite provocative. In the beginning of the film, Greengrass shows the violence that Nakoula and his co-defendants are capable of. I found this documentary to be very powerful and very shocking. The way that the violence is shown is so brutal and the violent scenes are the ones that the mainstream media can't do anything about. Nakoula seems to be able to get away with all his crimes because he's so good at what he does. He says that it is the business that he is in and that he does this for the love of God. This film has an interesting message that should be taken to heart. It shows that violence is a tool to get people to say the right things. Nakoula wants people to know that there is a God and that there is a place for them in the world. The movie is a bit of a confusing mess. I think that Nakoula's message is lost on people because of his past and the violent nature of his movies.

Philip photo
Philip

I don't know why the movie is getting a bad reputation but, I think it deserves the credit. I loved it. Not a lot of action, but a lot of emotions. Great directing, great editing. Not a lot of Hollywood types, but good actors and actresses. And it is a story about someone who survived a war. Great job!

Betty photo
Betty

I was hoping for a film that would show the horrors of war, the human tragedy and the political discussion that occurred between people of different nations and cultures, but the film turned out to be a bit too wordy and the visuals were poor. I have seen documentaries with much more information and sometimes this could be seen as an advantage in my opinion, but I feel that the film was an opportunity wasted. I have read some of the reviews on IMDb and most of them seem to be positive. I would not say that the film is perfect, but I believe it is a balanced look at a complex issue. I did not find the film to be boring, it was the more than a little slow at times but it was still enjoyable and not bad at all. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants to learn more about the issue and how it affected many people. 8/10

Lisa photo
Lisa

I can't think of any other war movie that captures the real horror and tragedy of war quite as well as "Nana" does. Director and author David Schofield's film was a real eye opener. I won't spoil the ending but I do think you'll find it pretty fascinating and fascinating that we still have to fight these wars today. The film does an excellent job of showing both sides of the issue. You'll be taken through the Allied and Axis forces to each country and also see the impact of the war on individuals, families, and communities. It does a great job of showing the horrors of war. The film also shows both sides in a realistic manner. It shows the beautiful countries of the British Empire as well as the atrocities that took place in France and Germany. The movie was very well put together and the story was very well done. It was very emotional and I can't think of a better movie than this. I highly recommend this movie and I can't wait to see it again.