فيلم Cosmos


Cosmos is a movie starring Sabine Azéma, Jean-François Balmer, and Jonathan Genet. A young man, hoping to write a novel, visits a French guest-house with a friend, he but finds himself distracted by a strange mystery and the...

Other Titles
Kosmos, Kosmosas
Running Time
1 hours 43 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Andrzej Zulawski
Witold Gombrowicz, Andrzej Zulawski
Jonathan Genet, Johan Libéreau, Sabine Azéma, Jean-François Balmer
France, Portugal
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Witold just failed his law-school examinations and Fuchs has just quit his job at a Parisian fashion company. Arriving for a few days away at a so-called family guest-house, they are greeted by a series of unsettling omens: a sparrow hanging in the forest, then a piece of wood in the same condition, and finally signs on the ceiling and in the garden. In this guest-house there is also a baleful mouth, that of the maid, and a perfect mouth, that of the young woman of the house with whom Witold falls madly in love. Unfortunately, she has just married an architect of the most respectable sort. But is the young woman equally respectable? The third hanging, that of the cat, is Witold's doing. Why did he do it? And above all - will the fourth hanging be that of a human?

Comments about drama «Cosmos» (21)

Anthony photo

There was a lot of excitement at the beginning of the year for what could be a very important film. It was, to say the least, extremely polarizing. However, what I believe the people who saw this film were hoping for, was simply a great film. I believe that, as a fan of the science fiction genre, I was also hoping for the kind of film that we were promised. The film was anything but a masterpiece, but it was a good film. I also believe that, for those who were not huge fans of the genre, the film was equally polarizing. I thought that the film could have been much better, and perhaps even boring at times. As for the film itself, I thought it was good. It wasn't the best film ever made, but it was still a good film. The only thing that I didn't like about the film was that it seemed to lack the kind of consistency that could have made this a great film. It wasn't great, but it was still good. I would recommend the film, but I think it is also worth a look, but I wouldn't recommend it to everyone. It is definitely not a film that everyone can enjoy.

Betty P. photo
Betty P.

I was prepared to be disappointed, when I was informed that the film would be shot in the traditional way, and not in 2.35:1. However, it was good to see the film in this format. The story is compelling, and the visuals were breathtaking. It was a bit difficult to focus on the story as much as the visual aspects of the movie, however. I believe the story would have been stronger if it had been shot in the traditional way. I am sure the film would have been equally successful had the story been told in 2.35:1. However, I will give it a 6 for the cinematography, and a 6/10 overall.

Dennis Lynch photo
Dennis Lynch

A likable, likeable character who doesn't realize that he's in a tragic situation until it's too late. (Not really, I just wanted to tell you.)

Eric R. photo
Eric R.

I have never before seen a movie like this before. This is a story of two people who are unable to get along with each other. The movie is filled with intense and weird imagery and concepts. For a movie that deals with just two people in a small town, it is amazingly original and unique. The pacing is extremely slow and fast. It does not drag on for a second. It does not create slow spots because there are no slow spots. The story unfolds slowly and if it feels like you are waiting for something to happen, it will, but the whole time, it never does. This is definitely a movie that should be seen by anyone who loves slow-paced films, but it is also a movie that is able to draw in a lot of people, and even have some really cool visuals. I would highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes a movie that is slow-paced and has a lot of imagery. It is definitely one of the most unique films that I have ever seen.

Carol Andrews photo
Carol Andrews

I went to this movie with my friend hoping to get a kick-ass kung-fu flick. I was disappointed. The movie is 2 hours and 13 minutes. Yes 2 hours and 13 minutes. I felt the movie dragged on a lot of the time and it became unbearable to see how great the movie was. A lot of the other reviewers may not understand the "mise en scene". This is one of the things that I am hoping to understand when I watch this movie. It is not for everyone but for me, it was an OK movie. I really can't say much about the acting, it wasn't amazing but not terrible either. The effects were really good and the fight scenes were really well done. It was hard to tell the difference between the effects and the action scenes. But again, I am a huge kung-fu fan and I'm sure that the effects were worth the price of admission. This movie could have been so much better. Don't go expecting a 100 million dollar kung-fu movie. I was expecting a lot more but maybe it's a bad review on my part. But overall, I think this movie could have been a lot better. This movie has a little bit of everything. Action, Romance, Drama, and some humor. I do recommend this movie but it is a movie that you will have to do yourself. You won't regret it. It is a movie that you will be wanting to watch again. This movie is worth the price of admission. It was good.

Hannah H. photo
Hannah H.

There are two different types of movies, good movies and bad movies. Here we have a good movie with great acting and brilliant story telling. But in the end it was just not for me. I could not relate to the story or understand the meaning of it. The characters were not convincing. And most importantly, it was not emotional. The only part that made me feel good was the first meeting between Terence Stamp and Deidre. It was very emotional. That was the only part that made me feel good. I think that the movie was flawed. But I did not understand the lack of emotion in the last scene.

Betty Tucker photo
Betty Tucker

In a nutshell, the core of the movie is the story of a teenage boy named Mike, who is simply a good kid. He has a solid work ethic, loves reading and is a hard worker, and he is just a good kid. Then, all of a sudden, he's not the good kid anymore. He gets the rejection letters from his school and he suddenly becomes an outcast in his school. The movie is not about the actual problems that happen in the life of Mike. It's about how he goes through life, especially after his mother dies. Mike does not want to go to the funeral. He does not want to have a brother. He has a friend, a girl, a girl's cousin, who is also in the high school. But, he just can't go. So, he says to his friend "hey, give me the money and let's go" and he does not listen. I liked the film a lot because the story is about Mike's life, and it is about his life, not about the story of the high school. This is a good story about the social situation of a person in a big high school, but it's also about the personality of a person in a small town. It's not about the individual personality of the person, it's about the social situation of a person.

Patricia Sandoval photo
Patricia Sandoval

For all the fans of Frank Capra, and for all the fans of Werner Herzog, Cosmos has not one bad thing about it. It's beautiful, it's energetic, it's completely unique, and most importantly, it's worth watching. It is absolutely a gem, and I'm so glad I saw it. It's a movie that is not only beautiful, but also extremely entertaining, and I would highly recommend it to anyone.

Amy Tran photo
Amy Tran

In the film, "Cosmos", which is based on the scientific work of Carl Sagan, a former NASA astronomer, the metaphor of the heliocentric solar system is used to explain the mysterious and inexplicable. This solar system with a more than 10-year sun-like star at the center of it is similar to the one in the film "Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey". This time, the movie was directed by the director Carl Sagan, a former NASA astronomer. He explains the mystery of the sun in a way that is scientific and scientific. This explanation is quite clear and concise. I have to mention that Carl Sagan is a wonderful man and very well educated. He is a well known author, author of the popular books "Star Wars" and "The Right Stuff". He is also a very well known astronomer. I have studied the astronomy of Carl Sagan and his books in school. He is not a person to confuse the public. In the movie, the sun is seen from a distance of 200 million light years. In other words, there is not that much light from the sun in the universe, which is one of the main reasons why we have planets in the solar system. This is a very nice explanation. In the movie, the sun is a strong magnet and when you look at it, it causes a magnetic field in the area around it. But it is not like the sun is powerful enough to affect our bodies and influence our lives. This explanation is so clear that it was very important for me to see the movie. In conclusion, I recommend the movie "Cosmos" to everyone. It is a very good and very thought-provoking movie.

Tiffany Hamilton photo
Tiffany Hamilton

It is not difficult to grasp that the American made films of the 80's were mostly product of a small group of filmmakers that were able to cobble together a tight script and an underdeveloped story. Cosmos is just one of the cases in point. Not that it was a great film. On the contrary, it had a lot of holes in it and would have benefited from a larger budget, a bigger cast, a better director, etc. The basic story of the film revolves around two male friends, Carl and Daniel, who go on a trip to the (unfortunate) event of the manned landing on the moon. There is also the threat of an impending nuclear war, which must be fought off in a nuclear holocaust. In a strange twist of fate, these two main characters are on a mission to save the world from the evil leader of the bad guys, a madman named Leslie Maitland. The story is pretty good but not exactly engaging. Carl is a man of little ambition, especially for a man of his stature. It is clear that he is just one of the many people on the journey. He just wants to go somewhere and see the sights. He cares about the world and his friends and is willing to go the extra mile for them. He makes sacrifices for them and he even sacrifices himself for them. That is the main character's motivation. That is what Carl is. He wants to save the world and be a hero. His friends do the same. Their motivations are much more developed. They want to save the world and they care about others. In the end, they are just pawns in a larger battle. It is not that Carl is the villain, that the other two are the good guys. It is just that they are the bad guys and they are their own people. It is not that one person is bad and the other good. It is simply that there are two different people. One man is trying to save the world while the other man is trying to save the world. There is a plot twist that is a bit of a shocker but it is still acceptable. The film has a good idea, a lot of potential but it could have been much better. The final twist that is revealed about Leslie Maitland's past is great but I can't help but feel a little cheated. There is one aspect of the film that is pretty compelling and that is the role of Ray Charles. He played a big part in the development of this film and I would have loved to see a musical number for the characters on the moon. The director was good but the music was a little too heavy for the characters. All in all, a good movie but it could have been much better.

Edward Hawkins photo
Edward Hawkins

I don't know what the critics are on about this film, but it's absolutely fascinating to watch. This is one of those films that makes you think about the way we deal with things that are troubling us. And then you start thinking about the people in the films who you might have cared about in your own life. It's as though you're watching a movie from a time when people just thought the world was the same as it is now. There's nothing modern about it. And yet the images of people from a very different time and place are depicted in such a way that you feel like you're right there with them. I thought this was very well done. A very good film.

Lisa photo

After viewing the film, I felt that it is far too long and really couldn't get to the point. The movie seemed to have a lot of material that it could have used but instead made the point with one scene after another. I thought the story was interesting but the writing was lacking. I think that the story was written very carefully but the director forgot to think about what the movie was about. He couldn't keep up with what was going on, he was trying to do too many things at once. He had no idea what he was trying to say and he had a hard time getting the point across. The whole movie seemed rushed and his efforts were not showing in the end. The only thing I liked about this film was the concept of the story. The way it was portrayed seemed to be really interesting and told in a way that made you think. The concept is not new but it could have been a lot better. I think that the movie could have been a lot better if it had been a little more structured.

Andrew photo

Although this film is more of a comedy than a drama, I still thought it was extremely interesting and thought it was great. It also is extremely well shot. The cinematography is very artistic. This is not just a comedy, it is actually a drama with a bit of a story to it. It is not perfect, but I think it is worth a look. The performances are great, I was very impressed with all the actors. This is a very interesting film to watch and I highly recommend it.

Kevin R. photo
Kevin R.

Don't expect any depth in this film, nor any deeper meaning. The film is all about a situation in the United States, a young woman being raped, with its moral issues and what it does to a man in the end. This is the basic story of this movie. No great new ideas here, just basic concepts of rape. I did enjoy this movie, but i also got the impression it was meant to be a film about rape. I can't say that for all movies, but this one is a little bit different. The characters are a little more interesting, and it's good to see how things change in their life, what the repercussions of the rape will be, etc. The ending was a little confusing, but i'm not sure how to explain it. Overall a good film. It is for some, but not for all.

Mark C. photo
Mark C.

The idea of "Two Weeks Notice" is certainly worth the wait, and the acting is good all around. I liked it, and I'm happy to have seen it. I can't wait to see it again. It's a good piece of work. Also, I think the director may have made a statement, by making us see the movie through the eyes of the camera. I was always fascinated with movies because I was looking at the world through my own eyes. The films that are worth seeing, that have your own eyes, are the ones that you think are great, and think others will think so too. "Two Weeks Notice" does that, and I think we should all be proud of that. * out of *

Charles photo

Steve Coogan is an idiot. Who doesn't know he is an idiot? He is such a mean-spirited idiot, that he's annoying and annoying as hell, and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. He's a joke, and his character makes me want to punch him in the face. If I had a god-damned attitude problem, he'd be the one I'd get out of bed to kill, and then I would be the one to get the hell out of bed, too. But of course, there is nothing good about Coogan's character, so this wouldn't be the most constructive way to deal with the issue of character disorders. It's all so stupid, that it's impossible to not hate the movie, because it's so horrible. I know that is an unusual thing for me to say, but I've always found it hard to like any Coogan movie, and this is one of the worst ones I've seen. To be honest, I don't have a problem with bad movies. I do have a problem with Coogan's character, and this movie is a proof of that. I never thought that I would, but I found it so hard to watch. The way it's supposed to be, is funny, but I just couldn't buy the humor in it. It's the kind of comedy that I'd find funny when I was a kid, but I just can't find it in it in this movie. I guess I'm just not that big on films with a simple plot, and Coogan plays the character to perfection, but his character is so retarded, I couldn't understand the character at all, and I couldn't care less if he lived or died. The plot of the movie, I can't say much about. Coogan is a journalist, who is hired by the government to investigate some story, but he doesn't want to go in it, so he goes to find out what happened. He ends up finding a strange alien device, which he intends to investigate further. But soon he starts to have dreams about the device, and one of the most memorable scenes of the movie, is when Coogan starts getting antsy, and thinking about it. There's really nothing more to say about this movie. There's so many stupid things in this movie that it just never stops being silly. There's the awkward character, the lazy/cheap jokes, and the way that the alien device is used as a plot device, the way that Coogan is being influenced by it, and the way that it is too stupid for its own good. This is really the kind of movie I would call, "Uncomfortable to watch". To be honest, I'm not sure how I can feel about this movie, or I would have changed my review. I'd probably recommend it to people who are just looking for some mindless fun, because this isn't a movie that you can go in expecting a plot or an intelligent movie. It's not that it's bad, I just don't have a strong enough response to the film. It's just a really stupid film, with very little meaning. I think if you like comedy, or just want to see a really stupid movie, it's not a bad choice to watch this. But if you want something more, I'd advise you to stay away from this movie.

Jeffrey Thomas photo
Jeffrey Thomas

Of course, some people will find this movie cliched and predictable. Of course, they're wrong. This movie was interesting, had some powerful scenes, and it was well acted. But I must say, I was impressed by its success. I know the formula for many movies - people are different, people have a profound respect for God, and religion is the main topic of the movie. But, this movie did a much better job than many other movies that have the same formula. It was a very honest movie. It was about a couple that was torn apart by the faith. A couple that was torn apart by a man they loved. But, when it came time for a divorce, the woman was torn apart by the man she loved. The movie was a very realistic depiction of a divorce, and it also showed the dangers of a divorce. It did a good job at showing the good and the bad side of divorce. The movie was interesting, and it showed that religion is not what is important in a relationship. It showed that there is a deeper side to religion, and that is the love of a man for his wife. This movie showed that. The movie was well acted. The characters were great. The actors did a good job at portraying their characters. The movie was entertaining. I think this movie deserves to be at least nominated for an Academy Award. It's really a well-done movie, and it deserves all the awards it gets.

Amanda Miller photo
Amanda Miller

I'm not a big fan of nature documentaries but this one was quite good. It wasn't 100% scientifically accurate but it was very good and very entertaining. I liked the whole narration in a way, the actors didn't seem too familiar but they were good. There is a lot of humor in it, and it's hard to not laugh at some of the stuff, even though it was probably not meant to be taken seriously. The thing that made it good is that it had a nice pace. I watched it on a very rainy day, it was very fun. The two kids did a very good job with their characters, the three adults did as well. This movie is really good and I recommend it to anyone. One thing I will say is that it is a bit hard to understand for some people. It is a bit hard to understand what they are talking about sometimes. One thing I didn't like about the movie was the ending, I found it a bit forced and it didn't make sense. This is a good movie for anyone to watch and it's a good one for any type of people. It is very entertaining and that's what I like about it.

Heather E. photo
Heather E.

Theres so much that you can learn from this film, but mostly it is a lot of images that come to mind when thinking about it. the film follows in the footsteps of Cucchi's The Three Mothers. I would say that this film is closer to the traditional family tragedy with an aspect of utopia as the alternate setting. In this case the utopia is that of the ship, but we are not sure. This film has an interesting contrast between the idea of the utopia of a ship, and the reality of the family and its difficulty to maintain its ideals. I think this film can be enjoyed by many people, the images are impressive, and the performances by Robert Duvall and Emily Watson are spectacular. A worthwhile film to watch.

Susan R. photo
Susan R.

I was really excited to watch this movie. I am very much interested in science and where we are heading. This movie is very inspiring. It was a really interesting and all around interesting story. I felt like I was really connected to the main character. I really wanted to be there for the characters. It was very hard to watch the movie at first. I didn't feel like I was connected to the characters or with the story. I felt like I was watching it from the outside. I think this was probably the most powerful part of the movie. The moment when the father/ex-minister was telling the story was really moving. I felt like the movie was telling me something and I was feeling it. I really liked the acting of Sandra Bullock and Michael Douglas. They really gave the characters a little more depth. It was really good. Overall I really loved this movie and it was very powerful. The ending was very powerful and very emotional.

Andrea A. photo
Andrea A.

A science-fiction movie about a journey into space and the need to overcome tragedy. While this is one of my favorite genres, I have never seen any of the "Legends" films. When I heard of this one, I decided to check it out. It was definitely a better film than I expected, and is far better than I expected. It's about a young man, Mark Wahlberg, who leaves his family in California, and heads to the countryside to live with his grandparents. During his journey, he meets a young girl named Helene, who is taking a bicycle trip to the wilderness with her father. The story follows Mark and Helene's relationship. Mark's journey in space is thrilling, and although I had some minor issues with it, I did enjoy it. When Mark first discovers a robotic telescope, I felt like I was watching a sci-fi movie. It seemed like it was almost a movie. Mark and Helene's romance is also intriguing. I was also interested in the history of the "Legends" group. It was very interesting to learn more about their lives and the reason behind their existence. The end of the movie is also exciting. The one thing that I didn't like about this movie was the lack of acting. It felt like it was missing in the middle of the movie. Some of the actors did their best to do their best with their characters, but some of them just seemed to be trying to do their best. I'm not sure why. I was also not impressed by the romance between Mark and Helene. Their romance seemed to be some sort of a setup for a future movie, but I wasn't completely convinced that that was the case. Overall, I enjoyed this movie, but there are a few things I would like to say about it. It was one of those movies that I wanted to watch more than I did, and I definitely need to watch it more than once. My biggest problem is the lack of acting. I did feel like the film could have used some more actors to fill the roles. They were not all that memorable, and their characters seemed to be used for something else. Overall, I would recommend watching this film, but only if you have a free weekend. You may not have to pay for it, but it might not be worth it.