فيلم 21 Bridges

21 Bridges

21 Bridges is a movie starring Chadwick Boseman, Sienna Miller, and J.K. Simmons. An embattled NYPD detective is thrust into a citywide manhunt for a pair of cop killers after uncovering a massive and unexpected conspiracy.

Other Titles
Manhattan Lockdown, 21 Mostů, City of Crime, Crime Sem Saída, 21 Mostov, 21 Most, 21 Cây Cầu, 21 tiltas, 21 Gsharim, 21 tilts, 21 mostów, 21 híd, 暴走曼哈頓, 21 Γέφυρες, 21 Pontes, 21 silda, Poursuite sous pression, 17 Bridges, Manhattan sin salida, Nueva York sin salida
Running Time
1 hours 39 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Action, Crime, Thriller, Drama
Brian Kirk
Adam Mervis, Matthew Michael Carnahan, Adam Mervis
Chadwick Boseman, Sienna Miller, Stephan James, J.K. Simmons
China, USA
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An embattled NYPD detective is thrust into a citywide manhunt for a pair of cop killers after uncovering a massive and unexpected conspiracy.

Comments about action «21 Bridges» (20)

Jacob R. photo
Jacob R.

With a supporting cast of Robert Mitchum, James Whitmore, James Coburn, William Devane, and Jack Palance. It's not a bad film. It has its moments. It's a feel-good movie. The script is too sophisticated for it's own good. The story, if you don't know, is a loose sequel to the TV show. It's not perfect, but it's not bad either. You can find faults in it if you're willing to look, but it's a decent movie. The only thing that was a little irritating, and it was more annoying than entertaining, was the lack of music in the background. The music was good, but not as good as I expected. The scenes were fast paced, and sometimes it was a little hard to tell what was going on. The characterizations were more developed than usual, and I liked it that way. I recommend it, but I wouldn't call it a "Must See."

Alice Price photo
Alice Price

What would you do if you had the chance to travel back to 1985? The answer is not much. The original version of "Bridges" was produced in 1985, and the 1980's was pretty much a wasteland of so-so fare. You could see what was happening, but there wasn't much to see. The only other movie to come close to the quality of "Bridges" was the excellent "Into the Wild". "Into the Wild" was released in 1980, and you can see the parallels with "Bridges". The only difference between the two movies is the release date. "Into the Wild" was released in 1980, and "Bridges" was released in 1985. Also, "Into the Wild" had a shorter running time, so you can see the limitations of the film. In 1984, the new director, Francis Ford Coppola, would release the "Kingdom of Heaven". It was the first of a trilogy of films, and one of the three films was directed by a woman, Carol Reed. The "Kingdom of Heaven" was released in 1984, and it was the second of a trilogy of films that would be released in 1985. The film was good, but not great. The film was only 89 minutes long, but it was certainly better than 99 minutes. Carol Reed and Catherine Tramell starred in the film, and they had an interesting chemistry together. The film is a film that takes place in the late 80's. It was written and directed by two women, Carol Reed and Catherine Tramell. Carol Reed had a short stint in television, and was the first of two women to play a serious role in the genre. She had a memorable role as Martha Stewart in the TV series "Who's the Boss". Catherine Tramell had a career spanning the 80's and 90's. She had a supporting role in "Gone With the Wind", "MASH", and "The Avengers". One of the films that Catherine Tramell did in the 80's was "The Virgin Suicides". I haven't seen it, but I'm sure it's better than the other films in the trilogy. The film is an interesting look at two different times in the life of a woman. Carol Reed played a small part in the film, but she played the major part in the film, and she played the role of a young woman who was the lead in the film. Catherine Tramell was also a supporting role, but she played a major part. She was the love interest, and the wife. The film is a film that is not for everyone. The film is quite violent, and there are scenes that are graphic. The film was a hit when it came out, and it had a limited release. The film is a good film, but not a great film. It was a success when it came out, and it had a limited release. I'm not sure that it will be getting a wide release. I think that it is a good film, but not a great film. If you are a fan of the film, I think that you will like it. If you aren't a fan of the film, then you will probably not like it. I think that the film is worth watching, but you will probably not like it.

Jack Romero photo
Jack Romero

For me, this movie was very interesting. I know that I would be surprised if I was not impressed by it. I thought it was well directed and acted, and the story line was well thought out. The chemistry between Michelle Pfeiffer and Robert De Niro was excellent. This movie is a true, high octane thrill ride.

Olivia H. photo
Olivia H.

After a little boy named Bridges (Michael Douglas) gets an amazing accident, he's transported to a fantasy world called The Realm of Sirens. There, he finds a lovely but odd looking girl named Fantasia (Shirley MacLaine). There, he meets the titular character. On his journey to find the one who saved his life, he gets into all sorts of trouble. The rest of the movie is a mystery. The film is a little slow but it's still a fun film. The acting is great and the directing is great. The story is a little too hard to follow but the special effects are awesome. The cast is great. I'd definitely recommend this to anyone.

Jason photo

I just came back from the world premiere of the new film, 'Bridge' at the Silver Lake Film Festival. 'Bridge' was made by the filmmakers of the 'Lifespan' franchise. 'Bridge' is the second film in the trilogy. It stars Academy Award winner, David Strathairn as Steven Belmont, a man on the verge of falling apart and needs a little help to turn his life around. That help comes in the form of young journalist, Sally Fields, played by Oscar winner, Meryl Streep. This movie is written and directed by David Gordon Green. I have not seen 'Lifespan', but I have heard some really great things about this film. I went to the world premiere on the 15th of May in Los Angeles. The film was well received, but it also received a lot of criticism. The film is about a man who is in a hopeless, bad situation and he needs someone to help him. That help comes in the form of his friend, Steven Belmont. They meet up at a diner, and Steven asks Sally to drive him to a bar. She says yes, but then she is later forced to drive him to the bar. She stops and she has a brief encounter with Steven. Then she asks Steven to drive her home. This leads to her getting into a situation where she is forced to drive Steven to a motel. She is going to stay there overnight. Steven asks her to go to a motel. He tells her that the motel has a curfew and that they will have to leave the next morning. This leads to Steven and Sally sleeping together. When she wakes up in the morning, Steven is gone. They meet up at the diner. She has a few drinks with Steven, but they don't talk. The next day, Steven is found dead in the motel room. He had been strangled to death. They are then forced to watch the murder of a woman. When they are later asked to be witnesses, Steven tells them what happened. Steven was murdered because he would not testify against his friend. Sally does not believe him, and they begin to have a lot of problems. The film is very violent and is very intense. The film was very interesting and was very well received. I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys dark, violent, and graphic films. It is not the best film, but I think it is a very interesting film.

Samantha photo

I'm not sure why the movie is rated so low, it's very good for its own right, but it's hard to believe that this was the result of a high-budgeted production. The cast is good, as usual, and the story has a nice twist to it, and the whole thing has a bit of action and drama. The only thing that bothered me about the movie was the ending, which I will not spoil, but I felt it was not very believable. I know that's not necessarily a bad thing, but I thought the whole thing was just a bit too staged, and the ending, I think, was more intended to show us how well-balanced the characters were, than to explain anything. Anyway, the movie was enjoyable, and the cast did a good job. Worth a look, but nothing more.

Brittany Garza photo
Brittany Garza

A little more comedy than action and a little less that action. Still, it is a good movie and worth watching. That's all I can say. Good to see more stories from directors who actually know how to write. A little more action and a little less comedy and it would be a masterpiece. For me, the ending was the weakest part of the film. But hey, I'm only a film critic.

Justin photo

I have been looking for this movie for many years. I had the pleasure of seeing it a couple of years ago. The storyline was quite good and a bit surprising. The acting was good, the plot was not as complex as I had expected. However, I can see why some people would be put off by it. I think the plot is very important in this type of film, but not everything has to be done in the most complex way. I also did not like the ending very much. I would have liked to see how he managed to find the bag that he used to escape from prison. The ending just seemed a bit rushed and weak. Overall, it is a good movie and worth a watch. It does have a somewhat unoriginal storyline, but it is well done. I think people should just watch it for the story and characters. I also think that it is an excellent movie for children, as it does have a moral message. It is also great for teens and young adults, as it is a movie that you can actually get into. I think that this movie was not very common in the 80's and even now it is not very common. I recommend that you go and see it, you will not regret it.

Ann Harvey photo
Ann Harvey

Hugh Jackman is not really a great actor and this is not a good example of his skills.But he does it for this film, I don't know why. He's very good at it.The rest of the cast are good, but nothing great. If you're looking for a good action movie with some well known actors, go for it, but don't expect a great film. If you want to watch some good action, this is it. But the plot is very thin, the acting is very bad, the direction is also very bad. The camera is very bad, the only reason I can give for this is because this movie was shot in the natural surroundings, but the acting is bad, the dialogue is very bad. In conclusion, if you like action movies with a lot of action, and you want to watch some good action movies, watch this one. Otherwise you'll be disappointed.

Wayne D. photo
Wayne D.

Hollywood may be fond of copying others, but this is the first time I have seen a film with a script and a budget that is nearly as good as the originals. For a modern day film, it's pretty damn good. It's very, very violent. Not as much as some movies, but very violent. The movie does not deserve the slasher/murderer tag. I have never seen a movie where a character is killed over and over and over again. The story is pretty straight forward. It is the story of a man (Charlie) who is given a contract by a gang leader to take out a drug lord. They get the contract because they are all going to be killed in the process. Charlie has to go into the jungle and find a few survivors to kill. He comes across a beautiful woman named Sherry (Barbara Crampton) who tells Charlie that she is the leader of a drug lord's drug empire. He meets her and they have sex. The next day, Charlie and Sherry decide to go on a trip. Charlie tells Sherry that he can't trust her, and she then goes back to the jungle and kills all the other gang members. Charlie, on the other hand, decides to stay and kill the drug lord's family and friends. Sherry and Charlie go on their journey, with Charlie chasing them all. As they travel, they meet a young boy named Randy (Jack Nance) who is obsessed with Sherry. Charlie takes Randy along with him and they go on a journey to find the drug lord's hideout. They come across some other people who become their allies, and they learn more about Sherry and Charlie. I think that the movie is pretty good. It is certainly better than most of the movies that Hollywood is putting out. I rate this movie 7 out of 10.

Jack Harrison photo
Jack Harrison

In a strange and unusual turn of events, the number one most wanted fugitive from the Federal Marshalls (Kevin Costner) is, after almost six months, being held in the notorious "Rocky" jail. However, it seems that some government officials are trying to trade him for a longer time and the US Marshalls are apparently not willing to do that. As soon as they got the news that Costner's character is being held, they decided to send him to the notorious "Rocky" jail in order to find out why he was being held there. While the FBI is doing all they can to locate him, he decides to go to "The Dilemma", a prison where he will be able to escape. "The Dilemma" is an interesting prison, where they have a lot of differences and the prisoners do not get along. One of the things that makes this prison interesting is the fact that the prisoners have no need to eat. They are fed exactly the same food. This is not the case with the other prisoners, as they have to eat different meals. There is also a separate section for prisoners who have been convicted of crimes and are serving their time. In this section, the prisoners are allowed to choose the meal that they will eat. The reason why this is done is to give them something different, as it is impossible for the guards to make sure that the prisoners do not choose different meals. It is also interesting to note that the prisoners of "The Dilemma" do not get to choose what they will eat. They are forced to eat the same food, but they can choose which one to eat. This makes the prison quite unique and interesting to look at. The acting is good in this movie, as the performances of the actors are quite good. Kevin Costner is quite good in this movie as he tries to convince the other prisoners to do what he wants, in order to get out of the prison. In the end, it is really hard for him to get out, as he is trying to make his way to the escape point. The prison is also interesting to look at, as it is very dark and has some surprises. Overall, this movie is not bad, as it is a good movie to watch. It is good to watch for some action, but also it is an interesting movie to watch. This movie has been rated PG-13, so it is not really that violent. I recommend this movie to those who like action movies, as it is not a bad movie to watch. This is a good movie to watch, as it is quite different from other movies. This movie is not for everyone, as it is different from other movies.

Joe G. photo
Joe G.

This film is a lot better than you would expect. While it's not a great film, it's actually a good film. I wouldn't say it's a "must see" film, but I would say it's a pretty good film. There are some things that can be better, but this film is much better than most of the ones that are coming out in the future. The story isn't really good, but the main character is a good one. The bad guy is a bit dumb, but he isn't that bad. The actors are good, and I think the main actor played a good part. The action scenes are good, the fight scenes are good, and the rest of the action is good. Overall, this is a good film that I recommend to people who like action films. I give it a 7/10.

Kenneth L. photo
Kenneth L.

There are so many reviews of this film saying that this movie is awful. Well, I agree. It is the kind of movie that people are saying is the worst ever, but I just think it's a lot better than most movies these days. It's very fast-paced and has an interesting plot. It's also quite well-acted, and the people that are supposed to be bad are actually really good actors. If you want a good action movie, see this.

Mary Austin photo
Mary Austin

Even though the film is based on a book, it's not so bad as to be an absolute waste of time. The story isn't that bad and it is a good action film. It has a decent pace and is also quite fun to watch. However, it is predictable and doesn't have a lot of suspense. The ending was pretty lame, and I didn't really get why the bad guys would come back. And if they do, it doesn't really have much impact. In addition, the story is just so thin and predictable. And this isn't even that great. The film is quite cheesy, and it is also quite bad. However, the film is pretty good, and it is an entertaining film. It's not that great, but it's OK.

Helen photo

I read some of the reviews for this movie and thought, hey, it's not great, but it's not the worst movie I've ever seen. I was right. This movie is a good action movie with some twists. It's a little slow at first, but once the action starts it's an adrenaline rush. The characters in the movie are not great, but you can see the motivations of the characters, which is good. There are some cliches that come up, but I'm not going to spoil it. You can't really blame the acting in this movie. All the actors did a good job. I think the best thing in the movie is the music. It was a cool way to make the movie. You can't tell it's a music video until you see the opening credits. I was surprised at how good the music was. I was also surprised that I was not bored at all. The story was not great, but the action was very good. Overall, this movie is a good action movie. It's not the worst movie I've ever seen, but it's not the best.

Christian K. photo
Christian K.

A couple of weeks ago I went to the cinema to watch this movie. And it was not the greatest movie I ever saw, but it is a movie that is worth seeing. It is an action movie. And it was the first movie I ever saw with Tom Cruise. But this movie is not only for action. It has the best actor, and the best action in the world. So in conclusion I would say that this is one of the best action movies ever made. Tom Cruise is the best action hero ever. This is the best action movie ever made. But this is not just a movie. This is the best movie ever made. 7/10

Willie photo

Kevin Costner is Robert Vadra, an older man living in California. After a failed robbery, he gets on the run for the last time. Now he's going to live in a small, secluded house in San Francisco. He takes care of himself, and then he'll meet his daughter, a young woman named Joanna (Gwyneth Paltrow). After a while, Vadra decides to stay in the house, but he still needs money to pay his debt to a drug dealer. He also meets a young woman named Judy (Naomi Watts). He asks her to be his date to a bar and she accepts. Vadra meets his daughter and they start to fall in love. One day, he sees a limo driving on the road and he thinks that he has a chance to be the new owner of the house. When he takes the limo, it's a fake. He returns to his house, but he's not there. When he goes to the house, he finds his daughter and she tells him that her father is still alive. He thinks that the house is his. He starts to search for the house. The house is full of traps and deadly traps. His daughter will not let him in. This is a great film, it's an interesting story, and the acting is good. It's a bit of a revenge story and there are also some funny moments. I recommend it. My rate: 7/10

Walter Gardner photo
Walter Gardner

I have been a fan of William H. Macy's for a long time, and his performance in "Bridge of Spies" was something of a surprise. It was one of the most exciting and gripping performances I have seen in a long time, and it was one of the best roles he has played. In this movie, Macy plays two men in the CIA, one of whom is a senior official and the other is a junior officer. The senior official is also a master spy, and he is also extremely aggressive and makes decisions that are not always in the best interests of the United States. When the junior officer becomes the senior official, the two men find themselves at odds with each other, but the decision to kill a Russian spy is made without much consideration to the consequences. This is a story about two men who are so focused on their careers that they forget their families and lives. The film itself is a good story, and I enjoyed watching it, but it is definitely not one of the greatest movies I have ever seen. If you like espionage thrillers, I recommend you check it out.

Shirley photo

I thought the movie was interesting, but not really worth the hype. It seems to be a lot of hype for a movie that is nothing more than a road movie. It just isn't that good. It is a good road movie, but that isn't all that it is. The cast is excellent. In particular, Jeff Bridges, as the good guy. If you like a movie that is a little more above the average, see this movie. It is worth a rental. 7 out of 10

Kathy photo

The movie is very exciting and not boring. Not to forget the great acting of Bridges. The movie is entertaining and even the ending is a great surprise. The movie is not to forget the character of Bridges. I liked the character of Bridges and his behavior. If you like the movie I recommend you to watch it. You will like the movie if you like the characters and the acting. This movie is very good, I give it a 7 out of 10. It's the best of the summer. If you like the movie, please share it with your friends and give it a rating of 10.