فيلم Les gardiennes

Les gardiennes

Les gardiennes is a movie starring Nathalie Baye, Laura Smet, and Iris Bry. Women are left behind to work a family farm during the Great War.

Other Titles
Vogterne, Beskyddarna, Vokterskene, Suojelijat, The Guardians, As Guardiãs, Las guardianas, 田園の守り人たち, Los guardianes, Čuvarke, Den'en no mamoribito-tachi
Running Time
2 hours 18 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
War, Drama
Director
Xavier Beauvois
Writer
Frédérique Moreau, Ernest Pérochon, Xavier Beauvois, Marie-Julie Maille
Actors
Cyril Descours, Laura Smet, Iris Bry, Nathalie Baye
Country
France, Belgium, Switzerland
Year
2017
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

An affecting human drama of love, loss, and resilience unfolds against the backdrop of World War I. The women of the Paridier farm, under the deft hand of Hortense, the family's matriarch (Nathalie Baye,) must grapple with the workload while the men, including two sons, are off at the front. Hortense reluctantly brings on an outsider, the hard-scrabble teenage orphan, Francine (Iris Bry), to help her daughter Solange (Laura Smet). New tools allow the women to triumph over the land, newfound independence is acquired, yet emotions are stirred especially when the men return from the front on short leaves. Acclaimed filmmaker Xavier Beauvois (Of Gods and Men) revels in the mysteries and beauties of the French countryside, here unravaged by war, with painterly images bathed in natural light, yet keeps his focus on the intricate drama that plays out against the upheaval of the Great War.

Comments about war «Les gardiennes» (24)

Carolyn photo
Carolyn

I've seen the movie twice now and I'm still not sure whether it was the movie or the soundtrack that was to blame. I'd like to say that it's a great movie, but it wasn't really like that. It could have been a great movie if it were more like the book, but it wasn't. I guess that's just what it was supposed to be. I guess I should try to watch the movie again so I can decide whether it was the soundtrack or the movie that was the problem. I was hoping to be able to see more of the book and I think that was the problem. I think the movie would have been better if it was like the book. I think it would have been better if the movie were made with the book in mind. In this case, it wasn't. I know the book is more exciting than the movie. I also think the book is more emotional and serious. In the movie, the movie was more like a comedy and it wasn't funny at all. It was sad, but it wasn't really sad. I think if you have read the book, you will enjoy the movie a lot more. I think the movie should have been a little more like the book.

Alice Cruz photo
Alice Cruz

I was very happy with this film. The first two parts were good, but this film took it to a whole new level. I was very much looking forward to see this film. I was not disappointed at all. It had a lot of great cinematography. The music was also very good. I loved it. I can't wait to see the third part. The film is set in 1940. I also thought the dialogue was very good. There were many interesting and interesting characters. I especially liked the German officer who spoke in a German accent. He seemed to be extremely intelligent and very well educated. It was also very interesting to see that many of the characters were played by French actors, as well. The French accents were also very good. Overall, this film is very good. It was a lot better than I thought it would be. I am looking forward to see the third part.

Carolyn photo
Carolyn

This movie has all the cliches of the modern war movie. The heroes are the good guys, the bad guys are the bad guys and the characters we're supposed to sympathize with are also the bad guys. The whole movie is based on the idea that every one has his/her own personal hero and villain, and that all the fighting is morally right, even if we're not told about it. A typical bad movie. And that's what makes this movie so enjoyable. In the end it doesn't really matter who the good guys are, because they are all, by definition, the bad guys. In the end it's all about the love story, which is more important than the battle. This movie is probably best for people who like movies about war, and not so much for the general audience.

Sandra P. photo
Sandra P.

If you are looking for a good movie to watch, this movie is a must. I have seen many movies like this one, but this is one of the best. I enjoyed every minute of this movie. It is a story about a woman who is a woman, but she has to be a man, and she is able to be a man when she is in front of her father. She has to go to war, and she has to have her father's approval. This movie is not for everyone, but it is worth watching. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Jean C. photo
Jean C.

I just came back from watching this film, and I must say that I was very impressed. The plot is very well-thought-out, the acting is very good, and the camera work is very impressive. The film is a little slow at times, but I think that it was for the best. I had to force myself to sit through this film, because I thought that it was the best film I have seen this year. This movie is a must see, because it is not just a war film, it is a great film. If you have not seen this film, do yourself a favor and watch it, because it is a good film, a good film that you should see. Thanks for reading my review. Rovis

Gregory Barrett photo
Gregory Barrett

A man is killed on the front line in World War II. This movie takes place almost entirely in a hospital. It is difficult to see what is happening on screen. I can't tell you what the movie is about because I'm not sure if it is a war movie or a drama. It is difficult to tell because there is too much going on. I didn't know the names of the characters. In my opinion, the characters are not important. The movie is based on a book. There is also a soundtrack that is very well done. I think the movie is worth seeing because it is very interesting.

David Hill photo
David Hill

I've read some of the other comments on this film and all of them have been extremely negative. However, I think that the film is very interesting and you will enjoy the experience. This is a good film to watch and also to learn from. I am French and I do not understand the subtleties of the language. I just saw this film in French and it is an amazing film. The director Michel Hazanavicius did a great job and I think that he is a great director. I hope that this film will be shown in other languages. I hope that this film will be seen by as many people as possible. I think that this film is a great and important film and it deserves to be seen by as many people as possible.

Henry G. photo
Henry G.

Loved this film, very well directed and acted, and very well written. The film is the story of a family, or rather a family of children, who have all been killed by a bomb in a train station in France. It is told by the children and by their older sister who was killed by the bomb. The parents of the children are trying to rebuild their lives, and to get back to normal, with the help of the townspeople and the school children. It is a wonderful story of the difficulties of re-building a family. There is a good message about the futility of war, and the destruction it causes. The acting is great. The film is a must see for all who are interested in the human condition, and the pain and suffering of the human race.

Gary G. photo
Gary G.

The French at war in Algeria in the 1970s were almost entirely ethnic Muslims. Algeria was an overwhelmingly Muslim country. The French were also highly religious, as well as being a military and economic superpower. They were also both religious and very proud of their religion. While there are definitely many elements of this film that can be seen as critical of the French government, it is interesting to see how the French were trying to create a new society that was not very different from their own. Many of the French who served in Algeria were Muslim, and they were essentially Muslim and not Muslim at the same time. There were also many French soldiers who were not religious, and many of them were very proud of their religious affiliation. The film was not a religious movie, but there were several scenes where a very religious and highly religious French soldier (Nigeria) talks about his religion. The French government was doing the exact opposite. The French were trying to create a society where all Muslims were Muslim, but at the same time they were also trying to be a military and economic superpower, so they couldn't allow any French to be religious. This film is not very good, but it is interesting to see the French at war in Algeria.

Walter Guzman photo
Walter Guzman

This is a solid, well-made film from director Claude Miller. The acting is strong, the directing is solid and the music is excellent. All of the aspects of the movie fit together so well. I think this is the best of his work, but that's not saying much. It's hard to see why he's not better known as a director. There's not a lot of depth to the story, but the story works well. The movie is also well-written. It's about a boy in the French countryside that is struggling with the war, and the war in France. The main character is an orphan that is at odds with his family, the village, and the war itself. The story is good, but it has a few weak points. For instance, the movie is quite long. It's definitely not a movie that you would want to watch over and over again. If you want to see a great movie with a strong story, then I recommend "La Vie En Rose".

Cynthia photo
Cynthia

While the movie seems to be designed to be as much a political statement as it is a film about a family, it's too reliant on politics to make much of a difference. As a film, it's still very good. The actors do a great job in their roles. The movie is worth seeing just to see a great performance by the mother. She is one of the most accomplished actresses of our time. Her performance in this movie is a great example of what can be accomplished by actresses and what can be accomplished by a director. The movie is well-acted, but one of the problems of the film is that it focuses on too many characters and too much of the film is just exposition. There is no real connection between the various characters. The ending of the movie was very abrupt, and it seemed as though they decided to skip over some important things, but I suppose that was their way of saying "We don't need to explain this to you. We've told you everything already." One good thing about the film is that it takes a look at an important subject. However, I wouldn't recommend this movie for people who aren't already politically active.

Ronald Young photo
Ronald Young

I'm not a fan of the European period. Most of them are horribly boring. But I really wanted to watch this movie. It was made in France, but it has some French elements. It is interesting, and the movie is not too long. In fact, I almost had to watch it 2 times in a row to get the most out of it. The movie is about the war in Cambodia. It is about the resistance in the country, the Vietcong, and the French soldiers. And the French Army. I really liked it. I like the movie. It was very different, and it has a very interesting story. It is about resistance, and it is very well made. It is not the best movie ever made, but it is not the worst either. The French Army in the movie is not the best. It is very boring. It has a very slow start, and it seems to be very slow. It is a very good movie, and it is very interesting.

Carl photo
Carl

The story is great. I had a few problems with the ending though. It was too much like a Hollywood ending. That was why I gave it a 7 instead of a 8. The acting is great. I've seen some really bad acting and it's really hard to tell if it's a bad actor or the director is bad. The cinematography is awesome. The movie has great atmosphere and it's very moving. The characters are great and the movie is long enough to really feel the pain of those who have been through the war. The ending is great and shows the connection between the different people who have been in the camp. The director has done a great job making you feel for the characters and understand why they are doing the things they are doing. Overall, this is a great movie. It's a war movie, but it's so much more than that. I think it's worth seeing.

Victoria J. photo
Victoria J.

I had the pleasure of seeing this film at the 2003 Toronto International Film Festival. It was a refreshingly different take on a well-known theme. It was, however, a small film and the only English language film I saw at the festival. However, I was intrigued by the film's visual style and the results of its five main actors. It is difficult to describe what it was that made this film so much more than the average war film. The filmmakers obviously had the artistic resources of a studio to work with and its production values are very high. The cinematography and music provide a very strong foundation for the film. The film's visual style is one that is often difficult to describe. In my opinion, it is quite similar to the way that American films have been depicting war. For instance, the music and cinematography are often in a similar vein. The war is shown as being very fast paced. The characters are often put in situations that are often very violent. In addition, there is often a strong emphasis on the emotional elements of war. The film is very slow moving at times, but in the end it is a very good film that is well worth seeing.

Anthony photo
Anthony

I was taken aback by the remarkable quality of the film. I had thought that a simple historical drama would be good enough. But this film was something else. It was very well done and very well acted. I really enjoyed the simplicity of the film. It's a really hard movie to explain. The way the camera follows the soldiers, the way the soldiers follow the camera, the way the soldiers move and the way the camera moves. I just loved that. The plot was really strong, but you have to be in the right mood to enjoy it. I was just amazed by the director's technique. It was really innovative. There were some parts that really stuck with me. I was amazed by the acting. I'm not a big fan of French actors. But they really did a very good job. The best actor was probably Francoise Guilbert. She really did a good job. I just think that she really deserves an award for this role. In a movie like this, you need a great performance. The other actors really did a great job. The cameraman was also really good. Overall, a really good film. I highly recommend it. I'm giving it a 7 out of 10. It's a really great movie.

Sandra B. photo
Sandra B.

I watched this movie the first day it came out, and I'm glad I did. This is one of the few movies I have watched where I was completely shocked and surprised by the events. In the first part, I was expecting a long and boring story about a German POW who had a horrible experience in the camp, and then he was left alone in the camp by the Americans. However, this is not the case. In the first part, the American soldiers were almost like monsters. They were not just 'evil' (like in other movies, they were just 'bad'), they were like demons, even a bit like vampires. But in this movie, the soldiers are actually human beings. They have emotions, they have thoughts, they have feelings. They are not just monsters. In fact, they are more like people, as human beings. The German POWs are actually portrayed as human beings. I love the ending, because it shows that the German POWs could actually have become heroes. The real heroes would have helped the German POWs instead of helping the American soldiers. I really recommend this movie. It's about human kindness, heroism, and also about the human spirit, and about the determination of the human to try and help people in need. I'm not a fan of most Hollywood movies, but this is one of the few movies I could find that I actually like.

Lauren photo
Lauren

This film was really good. It had a great cast, especially Jean Reno. I thought he played a great crazy man, not just crazy, but you could see he was acting. He didn't seem to be very religious and he was very much in love with an American girl, who was married. I have no idea why the French would kill the French. The French had a lot of influence on the United States and they were right. The French were the enemy of the United States. I thought it was a great movie. It was very well made and the actors were great. I would recommend this movie to anyone. The ending is not very happy. I think the movie is great, but I would like to see it again.

Thomas G. photo
Thomas G.

I watched this movie during my undergraduate years in college. I'm not too sure about the "good guys" or "bad guys" here, but the main character is a "hero", the villain is a "villain". In the movie, the main character is trying to get rid of his disease in a way that's not what he wants, and the "villain" wants to get rid of his disease, but what he really wants is the "good guys" to do it for him. The movie is basically a "time travel" movie, but there's a twist that I won't go into, just as I won't go into the twist of the "good guys" in the movie. In a way, the twist is good, and the movie is interesting to watch. The acting is good, and the story is interesting, but I found the movie to be a bit slow and to drag on. I feel like it could have been better. It was okay, but I feel like it could have been a lot better.

Timothy V. photo
Timothy V.

This is a French movie about the war in Algeria in the late 1940's. The movie starts with the Algerian army trying to capture a French POW, and the French soldiers fighting for them. After that, we are introduced to the French soldiers in Algeria, and their story is told. The French soldiers are pretty much what you would expect, but it's not all bad. There are some very interesting characters in this movie, and the acting is very good. The acting is not Oscar-worthy, but it's good. It's not a masterpiece, but it's not a bad movie either. The story is good, and the cinematography is good. It's worth seeing. It's a very good movie, but it's not Oscar-worthy.

Harry Wilson photo
Harry Wilson

I can't say I've ever seen the actual film, but from what I've heard, I'm pretty sure it was a pretty important film in the 30's and 40's. The reason I saw this film was because it was available at my local video store and I saw the cover of it. I wanted to see the movie, but I wasn't sure if it was a good film to watch. I finally saw the film and I must say, it's a great film. The acting was great, and the story line was great. I didn't feel like it was cliche, but I'm pretty sure that it was a cliche. The movie kept my interest and I'm glad I saw it. I liked the film a lot and I recommend it to anyone.

Diana F. photo
Diana F.

The first thing I noticed when I saw this movie was the complete lack of dialogue. The film is in French with English subtitles, but I think that's just a mistake. The movie is also very slow and it takes a long time to get to the point. It's not a very good movie, but it's definitely not a bad one either. I don't really recommend it, but if you're bored and want to see a movie about the horrors of war, it's definitely worth it. My rating: 7/10 Rated PG-13 for strong violence, language, sexual content and drug use.

Walter photo
Walter

I'm not sure if it's the movie, or the director who is at fault here. All of the characters in this movie are played by highly talented actors and actresses. They all have a distinctive style and their character is more than the sum of their parts. They're all likable and somewhat interesting in their own way. The movie is too long for what it is. It starts out very well. It's not long at all and it never feels as if it should be. It's always seems to drag a little bit, but not a lot. It's kind of like a character study of the entire French Resistance and the struggle of the resistance to fight the Nazi's. It's well worth watching, but it's not a great movie. And if it were, it would be a great movie. I just didn't think it was a great movie.

Mary Mason photo
Mary Mason

I've been wanting to see this film for a while. It's been on my "to see" list since I saw the trailer. And I was not disappointed. It was very moving, and the performances were amazing. It is a true story. I'd like to see the film again, but I'm not sure if I would like the ending. I don't mind, but I thought that the ending was a little bit too quick. The cast is incredible. I'd like to see more of them in the future. In summary, this is a very good movie. But it is not for everyone. It is very emotional, and I think that it would be a better movie if it was a little bit longer. And I think that it could have been more realistic if the story had been a little bit longer. But I think that it is worth seeing. It's worth the price of the ticket. I have no idea why it is not playing in the cinemas. It deserves to.

Raymond Berry photo
Raymond Berry

The first thing you notice about this movie is that it is shot in black and white. It's a nice way to convey the feeling of a dark and rainy day. This movie is about the effects of war on a small town. It is set in the mid-1930s and the movie focuses on the lives of the townspeople. The movie starts out with the townspeople being informed of a great event that will change their lives forever. They are given a chance to see the town in its glory before the war begins. When the war begins, they must choose between their love for the town and their loyalty to the government. The movie is full of beautiful scenery and it's easy to get lost in it. I loved the music, the cinematography, the acting, and the message. It was a beautiful film that made me think about the war and the effect it had on the people who lived there. It is a good movie that can be enjoyed by anyone.