فيلم Zombi Child

Zombi Child

Zombi Child is a movie starring Louise Labeque, Wislanda Louimat, and Katiana Milfort. A man is brought back from the dead to work in the hell of sugar cane plantations. 55 years later, a Haitian teenager tells her friends her...

Other Titles
A Criança Zombie, Zombi vaikas
Running Time
1 hours 43 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Bertrand Bonello
Bertrand Bonello
Louise Labeque, Katiana Milfort, Wislanda Louimat, Mackenson Bijou
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A man is brought back from the dead to work in the hell of sugar cane plantations. 55 years later, a Haitian teenager tells her friends her family secret - not suspecting that it will push one of them to commit the irreparable.

Comments about fantasy «Zombi Child» (22)

Tammy photo

When the first issue of the comic series was released, I was convinced that the zombie apocalypse would be made up of the comics. However, that never materialized. Until now. Although Zombi Child has received mixed reviews from critics, it is certainly a good film. There are many scenes that will stick in your head for a long time. The directing is very good and the film flows well. This is a film that anyone can enjoy.

Harry photo

I have seen this movie before and have always thought that this was a nice remake of the classic zombie movie. I was wrong. If you're looking for a modern movie that is a bit more entertaining than the classic, this would be a good choice. The movie has some elements from the original that are cool, but it is not the same. I thought it was a good movie, but it was not the same.

Johnny Ruiz photo
Johnny Ruiz

Not really a zombie movie, although it is pretty close. There is a mention of the zombies not being able to move around, but they can breathe and they seem to be able to hurt humans. The reason for the zombies not being able to move around is probably because the sun will kill them and their breath is poisonous, but if they can survive the sun long enough, they will die from exposure. This movie was a decent adaptation of the book, and was very entertaining. The character of Ethan Hawke was quite good in this movie and it was very amusing to see him trying to become a famous painter. I would recommend this movie, but be warned that the zombies are not going to be the main focus of this movie. They will be zombies, and you will be watching a movie about how the zombie have been eating people and their breath is lethal.

Tyler C. photo
Tyler C.

Gore Verbinski has come a long way since his debut. His first film "Slumdog Millionaire" was more a slapstick comedy, but the subsequent "Shrek" movie was a great success and helped him build his reputation in Hollywood. "Zombi" is a great example of what he does best. While "Shrek" may have had some goofy moments and silly one-liners, the film still had plenty of entertainment value to it. This time around the film is more grounded, while still having its comedic moments. It was great seeing Will Ferrell and Emma Stone back in the "Shrek" world, but the performances are what really makes this film. Everyone has their role, and it is clear that they are very entertaining. My favorite performance is Will Ferrell's "Zombie Farmer." Will Ferrell has such an engaging personality, it is amazing to see him doing comedy. I think that he does a fantastic job, and I think that he deserves all the awards he has received for this film. The film has a lot of humor, which is something that "Shrek" never had. There are also a lot of scares, which are also a lot of fun to watch. However, the film is very serious, and I think that the jokes and jokes that come from the characters are often too sappy. Some of the jokes are made at the expense of women, and they are usually not funny. There are some moments where the jokes are more "realistic" than I would like, but I would say that the comedy is still very entertaining. Overall, "Zombi Child" is a great movie, and it is a perfect example of what is fun to watch. I would recommend that people watch this film, and I would also recommend that they read the book by John Pogue before seeing the film. The book is much better than the film. I would highly recommend that everyone go and watch this movie, and read the book first, because it is a lot more fun to watch than the film. "Zombi Child" is a great movie, and I would recommend that everyone go and watch it. Rating: * out of 5

Olivia Kelley photo
Olivia Kelley

A strange genre of movies made in the early '90s. A lot of things to it, but what I find interesting is that the horror genre had become very popular by then, and there were quite a few movies made in the genre. I'm not a fan of horror, but there were enough different movies to watch. The beginning of the movie is really weird and it doesn't really have a point or anything to it. But, as the movie goes on, it becomes more interesting and you get to see more of the world that was around the couple. I think it is a movie to watch. The acting is not so good and I can't believe that they have a lot of money to be able to do this movie. It is really poor, but I must say that I think that it is a good film, because of the concept. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Patrick F. photo
Patrick F.

The Last Story is a nasty, but hilarious film about a black man's journey to becoming a zombie. The story is loosely based on the "Scream" series. Its plot is very similar to the original "Scream" movie, but the writers were smart enough to use characters from that movie. Like I said before, the story is very silly and the plot is very cliche. The actors, though, did a pretty good job. There were some cool scenes, especially the scene where the little boy does the thing where he can't do his hands. The one thing that I really liked about this movie is the zombies. They are very well done and very horrifying. The one thing I did not like about this movie is the script. I didn't like the dialogue. It was very hard to understand what they were saying. If you're a zombie movie fan, then this is a great movie to watch. It's a good action movie, but there is nothing really special about it. It's a good popcorn flick, but it's nothing special. I wouldn't say this is a good movie, but it is a good movie to watch. Just don't expect anything amazing.

Beverly Green photo
Beverly Green

The reason why I was interested in watching this movie was because it was one of the first "Youth oriented" movies, and the majority of them were made in the 80's and 90's. This movie wasn't made for a generation that is around now. It was made for kids of today. The idea of being abandoned by your parents to live alone in a forest filled with poisonous snakes is something I thought was quite interesting. The story is quite simple, but the animation is quite good and the whole movie is quite interesting. The movie has a very good message behind it. I enjoyed it. It's not perfect but still worth seeing. I rate it a 7 out of 10.

Jean Spencer photo
Jean Spencer

The original 'Zombie' is a fantastic film with a wonderful cast and special effects, but I personally have found the remake (as I've watched the original) to be better. It still has some of the same feel, and is one of the better movies out there. It was good in a different way to the original film. The acting was good, the effects were great, and the story was good. But the cast and the effects were much more the same. The original film was great, the remake was much better. I thought that it was good in the same way as the original. I still think that the remake was better. It's good, but it's not as good as the original.

Megan C. photo
Megan C.

As a fan of horror films, I always have a particular attachment to the zombie genre. I am also a fan of the whole "zombie movie" concept, and this movie is probably the most typical of the genre. For the most part, it is fairly predictable, and there are a few scenes in it that are a little far-fetched (but I wouldn't call that a bad thing). However, the movie is entertaining, and it's worth a look. I think that the main thing that makes this film stand out is the fact that it is a tribute to Romero's "Night of the Living Dead." In this case, we have a group of people, who have decided to take part in an annual charity, which takes place at night. All of the people who come are infected with the "zombie virus," and the night is the one when they are most vulnerable. There is also the human element, as we have a group of friends who have taken up the challenge of living the zombie-survivalist lifestyle. There are some humorous scenes, like the guys trying to get a quickie from a buffet, but there are also some more serious scenes as well. This is definitely a movie that I would recommend, but be warned, you might be disappointed if you have not seen the previous zombie movies, as this film is more of a tribute to Romero's films. 7/10

Steven Chen photo
Steven Chen

Well, it's a shame that they decided to make a remake of an Italian classic. The original was a classic horror movie with two friends and the evil who haunts them. The remake, on the other hand, had one boy and a bunch of other kids living in a village. The same old story. Like the old horror movies, except the monsters in this one are made of mud, which makes the deaths more horrible. The plot is the same as the original, except it's a horror movie, not a comedy. There are two great actors in this one: Jack O'Halloran and Tommy Lee Jones. I love the former and the latter is awesome in this movie. The new people, though, I didn't like very much. But it's better than a remake of a classic movie.

Jonathan C. photo
Jonathan C.

It is rather amusing to watch the U.S. remake of the 1970 movie of this French horror masterpiece. While the film's plot is not new, the acting is excellent and the sound effects are spectacular. This film deserves to be seen, and deserves to be watched again and again.

Kimberly Pearson photo
Kimberly Pearson

Waste of time and money. It's been a while since i've watched this film but i'm wondering why? Just don't bother. And it's not that i didn't like it, but it just didn't hold my attention for more than 15 minutes. I don't think that this film could have done any better. It's a good film to watch once but it's nothing more. There are lots of great films out there that have better scenes than this film. Maybe the bad part is the bad acting. Maybe the bad acting is the reason why it's not better. Maybe the actors didn't give the best performances because they were so tired of doing this. The acting could be better if they actually did the scene. I think that the people who are talking about the great acting need to watch it and then tell me how great it is. I don't know what they're talking about. I've seen some bad films in my life, some great films, but this one just wasn't very good. This is a film that is worth watching once, but it's not a film that you should spend your money on. Don't get me wrong, I do think that this film is really good and i do like it, but i just can't say that it's one of the greatest films of all time.

Carl V. photo
Carl V.

I recently saw this film at the Philadelphia Film Festival. I had heard it was good, but wasn't really sure what to expect. The film is based on a book by writer/director, James Gunn. The book tells the story of a man who's life is in turmoil. He lost his wife, his job, his apartment, and has to travel to his kids' school to pick them up. I think he may have met his demise on that bus. The book doesn't get into much detail about the father. The movie focuses on him. The film does an excellent job of showing what he's been through, but it also shows that he's a man who's not very good at being a father, and I think the audience will probably sympathize with him more. He's not very good at being a husband, either. His wife left him, and he's still grieving over it. The movie shows him living in a city that doesn't seem to have much love for him. There's also a lot of comedy in this movie. It's pretty funny, and I think it made the film even better. The movie is worth seeing.

Susan Clark photo
Susan Clark

Udo Kier is an orphaned boy, who lives with his drunken grandmother. One day his uncle makes him a doll for his birthday. Soon after his grandmother is killed, he becomes the freakishly powerful monster, which he calls Udo. But Udo is not the same as he used to be. I'll explain more later. I do have to say that this film is entertaining from start to finish, even though it's only a PG-13 movie. The film is filled with comedy, action, and even romance. It is also quite violent at times, and may offend a few people. However, if you have seen a lot of foreign films and you don't mind that the gore is there, this one is a pretty good movie. I really enjoyed it. 7/10

Roy Kelley photo
Roy Kelley

OK, I think I'm being fair. There are a few times in the film when it gets really ridiculous and funny. But in general it's a really entertaining film. I mean, I don't think I've ever seen the likes of zombies in a horror film before. In fact, I have only ever seen gore and violence in horror films, but not zombies. This one has zombies, a girl who's the daughter of a billionaire, a beautiful vampire and an old man who's the father of the vampire. They're all great actors and I really enjoy this film. I recommend this film to fans of zombie films. It's very much a popcorn film and not very serious, but if you're into the genre then you'll definitely enjoy this. I think you should give it a go and see if you like it.

Helen C. photo
Helen C.

This is a very strange movie. I had never heard of it before watching it and I have to say it is well worth watching. It is a very strange film. It is not just some gorefest, it is a thought provoking, original film. It is so strange because the film is about an orphan and the director and his family are killing the guy who is going to inherit the house. The whole film is about the boy. The director himself believes that the boy will one day take over the family and he wants the boy to become the family's leader. It is a very strange film and I would recommend it to anyone who is a horror fan, and has a taste for it. It is one of the better films I have ever seen.

Margaret Gardner photo
Margaret Gardner

I am very surprised that this film hasn't been given a higher rating here. I had mixed feelings about it at first. I expected to see gore, and I got that in parts, but I also thought that the screenplay was weak. Then I saw that the director was also the screenwriter of the 1988 film "Chinatown" (co-directed with Peter Suschitzky) and that these two films are very similar in tone. It just seems that there is a lot of intellectual elements to this film, but the "genius" of the "hero" was not obvious to me, which made the "magic" of the "hero" pretty shallow. I think that the film is a bit too "unstructured", with some loose ends. There was one scene where the heroine was walking along a river, where her group of friends decided to help her out by having her walk in the water for a bit. The problem with this scene was that it was kind of difficult to keep up with the dialogue. In fact, I almost lost track of what was going on. I am not saying that the screenplay is bad, I just think that there were a few loose ends. This is an interesting film and I would recommend it for an intelligent but very slow evening.

Christopher G. photo
Christopher G.

I didn't watch this movie in theaters, because the DVD was the only way to see it. I actually rented it from an online movie rental site, but I was amazed to find that it was one of the rare DVDs that would actually play the video, not just display it. This movie is also interesting to say the least. Although it's a fun, zombie-themed film, it's also a pretty thoughtful, deeply-emotional one. The movie, which was directed by the director of the film's original American remake, David Cronenberg, has an interesting title. The movie was loosely based on the novel, which was actually written by the director himself. Cronenberg did a really good job of capturing the tone of the novel, and making it work perfectly for the movie. The best thing about the movie is the special effects, which are really, really, really well done. This movie is filled with some really imaginative and creative zombie effects. It's not just like the zombie in the original movie, but a whole new, very interesting creature. The zombies in the movie are pretty cool, especially the ones that have "wacky" teeth. They are very cool. I thought that this movie would be a little too gory for my liking, but the gore is very tasteful. Some people complain that the zombies in this movie are very "realistic" looking, but I think that's because the zombies in the movie look like zombies from another movie. They look like zombies that are out of a zombie movie, but not zombies from the first movie. If you like zombie movies, I recommend this movie. It's great.

Jacob photo

After his success in the horror/comedy genre, director James Cameron returned to a different genre and launched a film that took his filmography to another level. This was of course much more than a zombie movie. While I felt the film was somewhat uneven, I think it was a worthy return to the gore-fest that he was known for. The story was original, and if it had a slightly better story it would have been a better film. It was slow in some parts, but I think it was actually a bit better than the film it was trying to compete with. There was a bit of excessive gore, but it did not ruin the film. I did not really like the ending. It was a bit strange, but I can't really complain too much. I will say that it was kind of weird how they showed the zombies being attacked by insects. There were scenes where they could not move their heads, but then when they did it would be covered with an insect's body. It did not seem very realistic, but I think it was necessary to show the effects that the insects had on the zombies. I think this was more a success than the movie itself. It was a short film and the film is not a masterpiece. It's still a good film, but it could have been a lot better. I can't wait to see the sequel. I would also recommend it to anyone who liked the first film. 7/10

Kathy D. photo
Kathy D.

I was fortunate enough to see this film at the Austin Film Festival, and I loved it. This movie is a bit off the beaten path for me, but it was actually very well done. The actors were all excellent and the music was fantastic. The gore was original and the cinematography was also very well done. I think I may have actually enjoyed this more if I had seen it in the theaters. I think the movie would have been much more successful if it had been released on video. I also think it would have been a lot better if the film was more fun to watch. The problem I had with the film is that it's supposed to be based on a comic book, but the script is very uneven. There are a lot of parts where the script is just so-so, and a lot of times the plot is very weak. But overall, I really enjoyed this movie. It had a great script, great acting, and really good directing. The film also had a lot of comedic moments, so I can't say that it was a total mess, but I thought the film was pretty good overall. Overall, I recommend this film to fans of zombie movies, and I think it's one of the better films of its type.

Julia W. photo
Julia W.

This movie was good, but nothing special. The film was about a family trying to make it through the summer while having a baby. I didn't really like the way it was done in the beginning, but then it turned around and it was great. The plot was great and it was a lot better than most horror films that are out there. The acting was great, but the direction was awful. I mean, the zombies weren't scary at all. The best part was when they got the family out of the building and it was good. The story was great, but the story isn't good enough to make the film. There were some great parts, but it wasn't enough. The ending was really good and I liked it. I'm not sure if it was because of the ending, or the film itself. I did like the actors, and the story was great. The zombies looked cool. I mean, the zombies in the film were very cool. Overall, I recommend this movie to anyone who likes zombie films. But for the people that don't like zombie films, I wouldn't bother with this movie. There are many other films out there that are much better than this.

Betty Walsh photo
Betty Walsh

The last film of this series was director David Cronenberg's GORILLA, which came out in 1998. This film, on the other hand, came out two years later. It's worth seeing both films to see what Cronenberg did with the two films he had available. This movie does a better job than GORILLA in portraying the idea of death and the fact that it can be everywhere, on all sides of the human life. One of the things I liked most about this film was the way it portrayed what can happen when a person is very ill. It also showed the line between "I'm dying and I'm doing it for myself, not for anyone else" and "I'm dying, and I'm doing it for everyone else". The film also did a great job in showing how the virus spreads and how the people who are infected have to deal with it. This is what I liked about the film. I did find that the film did get too slow at times, though. Another thing I liked about this film was how it portrayed the idea of what people should do when they get sick. I do think that the film would have been better if it did a little bit more showing of the zombies and the virus. However, I still thought that the film was a good film. I liked it very much, and I'm glad that Cronenberg decided to go with the original concept of his sequel.