فيلم Hunter Killer

Hunter Killer

Hunter Killer is a movie starring Gerard Butler, Gary Oldman, and Common. An untested American submarine captain teams with U.S. Navy Seals to rescue the Russian president, who has been kidnapped by a rogue general.

Other Titles
Latzoud et ha'oyev, Hunter Killer - Caccia negli abissi, 潛艦滅殺令, Katil Avcısı, Operatiunea Hunter Killer, Ataque submarino, Misión submarino, Ocean ognia, Opération Hunter Killer, Fúria em Alto Mar, Operacija: Hunter Killer, Mật Vụ Giải Cứu, 潛艦獵殺令, A Hunter Killer küldetés, Operācija: Hunter Killer, Hunter Killer: Caza en las profundidades, ハンターキラー 潜航せよ, Lovac Ubica
Running Time
2 hours 2 minutes
Quality
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres
Action, Thriller
Director
Donovan Marsh
Writer
Arne Schmidt, George Wallace, Don Keith, Jamie Moss
Actors
Linda Cardellini, Gerard Butler, Gary Oldman, Common
Country
USA, UK, China
Year
2018
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
Subtitles
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

A U.S. submarine, the USS Tampa Bay, vanishes while shadowing a Russian Akula-class submarine in the Arctic. Rear Admiral John Fisk sends a Virginia-class submarine, the USS Arkansas, under the command of newly-promoted and unorthodox Commander Joe Glass to investigate. At the same time, a Navy SEAL team under the command of Lieutenant Bill Beaman is sent in to discreetly observe a Russian naval base. When they arrive at the naval base, they witness defense minister Dmitri Durov conducting a coup d'etat and taking Russian President Zakarin prisoner, and swiftly realize that Durov intends to trigger a war..

Comments about action «Hunter Killer» (21)

Elizabeth D. photo
Elizabeth D.

Director Hans Zimmer and writer Paul Thomas Anderson have done well with this well-executed film. The films message is simple: we are all guilty of letting our guard down for a moment. We should all start thinking twice, because we're all the same, every one of us. Well, most of us anyway. While it does lack the great, unforgettable, cinematic moments, it has it's moments and it's not going to be the best film of the year, but it's definitely a very entertaining film. Well worth the watch. My score: 7.9/10. Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language and a possible sexuality scene.

Juan photo
Juan

I remember when this was first released and it really was a surprising film. It had many memorable scenes and scenes that are well known. The only problem was that the movie was set in a western style setting, it did not quite blend with the rest of the movie. There were too many characters that were not really likable. This did not bother me as I just kept hoping that they would become more likable and the story would be good. It did not happen. The story is actually very interesting, and I like that it does not follow the standard western style. I would not consider this a classic, but I think it is good. It does have some problems, but if you are going to see this, be prepared to watch it in a western style setting.

Julie photo
Julie

This was a pretty good movie, and a lot better than I expected. I was a bit disappointed with some of the casting, the main reason for this being that I was expecting an American "Vampire" type of film, but with an Italian flavor and it just didn't hit the mark. However, the acting was very good, the story was enjoyable and the action was not bad either. The only thing that kept me from giving it a 10/10 is that I felt it was a bit too "cheesy", and a few scenes were very cringe-worthy. It also did not have as much style as I would have liked. A really nice movie and I would recommend it to anyone, but I would not recommend it to anyone who is expecting a Vampire movie. If you are expecting a film with a lot of blood, then you may want to avoid this film. If you are expecting a real action film with an American accent and a vampire, then you may want to check this one out. I give this movie a 7/10.

Laura photo
Laura

I recently saw this movie on the SciFi channel. I thought it was okay. I guess you could say it was for the kids, but it was still pretty good. The story is a typical horror movie, and is based on a book by Stephen King. You can tell that the director didn't want to take this book too seriously, and didn't take this film to the next level. The story of the movie is kind of a cross between a lot of movies, and a lot of books, and is actually a combination of a lot of stories. The movie starts off with a couple of friends going to a movie. They are discussing the movie, when suddenly the movie starts to go down. The movie starts off in an almost ambiguous way. But the movie is about to get really interesting. It becomes more and more violent, and much more gruesome, until you realize the guy on the far right is dead. The film gets a little bit repetitive, but the movie is still good enough to watch. My opinion on this movie is that it wasn't a bad movie, but it definitely wasn't a great movie. It wasn't great because it's original, or because it was a horror movie. It was good because it had an interesting story, and it had some good gore and blood. My rating: 6.5/10

Laura G. photo
Laura G.

You know when you watch a movie and the movie just doesn't seem to capture your attention or thrill you, or something? Well, that's exactly the case with this movie. It just didn't seem to work for me. I just wasn't feeling it. Then, at the end of the movie, I was wondering what all the fuss was about. It didn't seem to capture my attention. I'm sure it's because the characters were just that bland and boring. It wasn't captivating or interesting. I was just bored. In the end, I felt like I wasted my time on this movie. I would have never watched it if it wasn't for Netflix, and I'm not going to watch it again. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

Jean Mason photo
Jean Mason

I think this movie was pretty bad. They tried to make it look more hardcore but its still very basic. One thing that I don't like about this movie is that it just feels like they are going through the motions and there is no real thought put into it. I do like this movie because it seems like a cool concept and that it is like a cross between Taken and X-Men but I just didn't like it for the same reasons that I don't like the Taken movie. I think that they tried to make the movie out to be more hardcore and it just just doesn't work. Overall its a cool concept and I think that it could have been a great movie but it just didn't work out for me. I recommend it to fans of hardcore action movies that need to be fun.

Jerry M. photo
Jerry M.

I have to say I found this movie entertaining. I would have given it a 9, but the acting was a little stilted and the character development was lacking. It's a very different story from the one in the original, and it's good to see that it is still being made. The special effects and action were good. It was nice to see a movie that had a couple of laughs, as well. It also had a little sex and violence, but that's what you have to expect from this kind of movie. It's rated "R" for violence and some sex and language. You do have to be 18 to see this movie, but I think it's worth it.

Kathy P. photo
Kathy P.

After being kicked out of the Pan Am Line and forced into living in a dump, a group of passengers on a plane go into action to prevent their plane from being blown up. Which is exactly what happens, but before that the story takes us on a ride into the past. The film is a mash-up of many aspects from classic 80's horror films, and is actually pretty well done. There are a few things that aren't so great about this film, but in the end the film is a pretty enjoyable movie that is an original and entertaining piece of work. The action scenes are quite well done and the villain is very well played, though there are some aspects that are just not so good. The writing is decent and the story is unique. It's quite dark, but the film does have its moments of fun. It is quite well done and the acting is great. Overall, a good film. Watch it. 7/10

Arthur B. photo
Arthur B.

I enjoyed this film a lot, but if I was to give it a higher rating than 7.4, I would have to give it a 10. Although it was not the best of the Die Hard films, it still had a good story, good action and a good ending. I also liked the fact that it didn't have the gratuitous violence and violence, which really sets it apart from other Die Hard films. However, if you are looking for a Die Hard film, I would recommend that you stay away from this film. The one thing I did not like was the fact that the bad guys (which was the big bad guy) was not as charismatic as the good guys. But other than that, I would recommend this film to anyone who enjoys the action movies, or just want to see a good action film.

Brandon Keller photo
Brandon Keller

Good job for Kelly Reichardt. I am not a huge fan of him, but this movie really hit the mark for me. I like the style, the story and the writing. I am not a big fan of him, but this movie is a keeper. This is the first movie that I have seen that is in color. The story line is really good and the story is interesting. This movie does have a couple of flaws, but I am still giving it a solid 7/10.

Ryan T. photo
Ryan T.

It's hard to believe that this movie was made just a few years after The Matrix and it wasn't made for the same money. Yes, it has all the bells and whistles of a big budget action movie, but still there's something a bit different here. In my opinion, this movie is much more akin to a cult classic than it is to a blockbuster. The plot is essentially The Wachowski's version of The Matrix, which is an action film with a deeper message behind it. The movie starts out with a confrontation between the protagonist's team and a team of hired assassins who are on a mission to assassinate one of the team's members. It seems that the team is about to be killed but a malfunction in their weapons sends the killer and his crew into a car chase that ends in a shootout. All of this is leading up to a twist ending that I won't reveal here. All that I can say about the ending is that it was unexpected and quite shocking. The acting is good, the camera work is good, and the music is good. I could watch this movie again. As a cult classic, it is still pretty good, but the best part is that you can watch it with your friends and have a good time.

Arthur photo
Arthur

This is the worst of the Monster Squad movies. I'm not sure what all the hype is about, but I can't say I was very impressed. The first one was just plain scary. I was never scared of any of the monsters. I was scared of the first one. The second one had a better setup. The third one had some decent action. I thought the fourth one was better. But, the fifth one. well, I didn't even know what to expect. Maybe it was the worst. I don't know. It was just like "what was the big deal? This movie sucked! Oh, so it's not scary anymore! It's not even funny anymore! But wait, what was that?!" There was nothing interesting about it. There was no suspense. There was no feeling of dread. There was no buildup to the monster attack. There was no buildup to the last scene. It was just like the movie. They had one awesome fight, then the movie just died. And that was it. I don't know what the fans were talking about. It was just like "hey, it's okay!" I didn't think it was as bad as the first two, but it was still pretty bad. I would have to say the fifth one was the worst, but it wasn't nearly as good as the first three. I would definitely recommend the fourth one. It was better than the fifth. But I would only recommend the fourth one if you are just looking for a scary movie to pass the time. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time. It's not worth the money.

Matthew H. photo
Matthew H.

I really liked this movie. It had a lot of action, a good plot, some good surprises and some unexpected twists. It kept me guessing until the end. For some reason, I felt that they needed to get a few more outfits on the girls. It would have been nice to see more female fighting outfits, or more cleavage on the girls. I felt like the girls didn't have any development in this movie, except that they were wearing their combat outfits. It would have been nice to see more character development on the male characters. I also feel that the ending of this movie was way to obvious, but in my opinion, it was an okay way to end the movie. So overall, it was a good movie, and I recommend you check it out.

Donna W. photo
Donna W.

I've watched quite a few of John Carpenter's movies. This movie is, in my opinion, probably his best. The movie is about a hit man named John Bamber, and his daughter Ruby (Nicole Kidman), who is being taken to a boarding school for murder by her mysterious father. During the school year, Bamber, goes to the graveyard of his old friend and old boss Ed (Ben Gazzara) and finds out that he has a daughter, she's named Ruby. Bamber comes to believe that Ruby may be the daughter of his old friend, he goes to the grave of Ed and meets the ghost of Ed, who is alive and well and wants to kill Bamber. Bamber, having witnessed this, decides to get revenge. He goes to the U.S. Attorney's Office in his old town and kills off a lot of people, including the wife of the U.S. Attorney, and his daughter. This is when Bamber meets Cheryl (Michelle Rodriguez), who has an infatuation with him. During the movie, we get to see how his revenge will be, and he meets many people who are going to be a part of his revenge. This movie is really funny, I think it is one of John Carpenter's best, and it's also a movie that's really cool in its own way. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes the old movies of John Carpenter. 7/10

Jonathan photo
Jonathan

This movie does have a few flaws. 1. The first hour or so is a bit slow. There are also a few plot holes. 2. The ending is rather bizarre and seems a bit out of place. 3. Some characters are unnecessary. Like Nick, who seems to be a major character in this movie. He just becomes a supporting character. 4. The action scenes are a little too unrealistic. There are a few fight scenes that are a little ridiculous. 5. Overall, this movie is an enjoyable one. If you like action movies, then this is a must see. I give this movie a 7 out of 10.

Joyce Contreras photo
Joyce Contreras

An effective if rather predictable black comedy with a bleak, tragic atmosphere, "The Black Rider" (2001) was an excellent addition to the filmography of the once-great Renny Harlin, who had become somewhat of a Hollywood outsider. With this film Harlin makes it clear that he was no slouch on the cinematic business. "The Black Rider" is a fairly conventional crime thriller that presents an interesting story and a likable, understated performance by actor Adam Goldberg. As the film opens, a naked woman in a bathtub is struck by a car and killed. Later that evening, in a bar, a drunken actor named Christopher Snell (David Koechner) mentions that he was involved in an accident that left him paralyzed, after he was hit by a car in the road, a few years earlier. Snell is desperate to convince his doctor (Diane Keaton) that he has been in an accident, and the doctor tries to dissuade him. While at the bar, Snell is introduced to Joseph (Wes Bentley), a young man who is friends with a local barber. Snell is intrigued by the barber's chatty demeanor and quickly falls in love with him, when she realises that he is actually a car thief. Joseph's goal is to reunite with his lover and use him to smuggle the car back to Mexico. After Joseph comes across some prostitutes working at the barber's shop, he gets his wish to do the job, when he meets a former lover, (Tiffany Lutter), who is now a prostitute. The relationship between the two men forms a symbiotic bond, as the barber tries to save the woman he loves, by doing his best to help her. What was so effective about this film was its fantastic acting. David Koechner is able to capture the dark, brooding atmosphere of the crime thriller in a convincing and human way, which is also a big advantage of the film. His performance is very well-developed and believable, as he plays the reluctant hero, as opposed to some other recent strong female leads. The relationship between the two leads is also well-developed, and the script makes it clear that they are more than just a couple, as they work together, in order to complete their mission. The main flaw of the film is that the characters are not developed to the extent that they become interesting, and the film is a little bit predictable. However, this flaw is not a major issue, and I think that "The Black Rider" is a fairly solid film that is worth seeing for its acting and story. My vote is seven. Title (Brazil): "Uma Recombo" ("The Black Rider")

Christopher photo
Christopher

In the early 90's, Australian actor John Saxon made a name for himself with his self-parodying roles as one of the bad guys. His roles include Kato (Dead Ringers), Karlie (Underworld), and Roper (Last House on the Left) but in the early 90's, his career took a dive when he joined a country music group. One of his early films, Unholy Knight, was not released in the US, so it was a big surprise when his name was linked to a cult classic movie called "Re-Animator". If you've seen it, you may not know what I'm talking about. But you've likely seen it before and don't need to know anything about it to enjoy this film. This movie is based on the 1974 "Re-Animator" by Roald Dahl and is a much better movie than many claim. It's not a fantastic movie, but it's actually quite fun. The plot is pretty simple, but it's easy to follow. We follow a family of six as they live in the isolated house on a remote island. The father, played by Saxon, is a very intense man. He's obsessed with his daughter, but she wants to escape from the island. The eldest son, played by Christopher Lee, is getting into trouble with his peers. The youngest son, played by Jude Law, is trying to help his sister out, but he's scared to try. But he has a plan to escape the island. The most intense part of the film is the end fight between the son and the oldest son. This film is a cult classic and is worth watching. I don't think I've seen a film like it since. 7.6/10

Brandon T. photo
Brandon T.

This is one of the first films that I watched that had the crowd cheering for the good guys. I didn't get a chance to watch the movie for a long time because I couldn't bear to be away from it for a while. I was so grateful for that when I finally got to see it, and I was very pleased. I don't think that anyone should be disappointed that a few of the actors didn't make it into the film. Just about everyone was great. John Travolta had some very good scenes, and he was very believable as the good guy. Sean Young was very good as the bad girl. My only complaint would be that they did use the same music for both movies. It just sounded out of place. There are also some very nice looking women. This was a very enjoyable movie, I give it a good 7 out of 10.

Carol W. photo
Carol W.

With his fifth film in the franchise, John Woo finally delivers a decent thriller with the fourth film in the whole franchise, which is not to say that the others have been great, but at least the movies had a good amount of substance to them. I liked this movie, and the story did bring some substance to the genre, but the movie was much more about the action and violence, and the violence did not seem to be the main focus. The action scenes were the best part of the movie, and the action was well choreographed and well executed. The action was not as over the top as other action movies in the series, but it was still pretty amazing. I liked the ending, it was a little surprising, and the last scene had a nice sense of closure. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is a fan of the action and suspense genre, because it does deliver a solid thriller.

Virginia photo
Virginia

On the face of it, this film has a bland, uninspiring plot. The protagonists are high school students and a teacher and a student. The teacher is really evil and the student is just as bad. The plot is set up very well, as the writer seems to want to build a really great movie. A huge murder mystery, a little romance and a really cool punk rock soundtrack. But when you have no plot, no interesting characters and the movie ends up being a big stinker. The viewer is left with a really disappointing movie. There are some good acting performances and there are some truly amazing scenes. But the movie is too long and feels like it was made to be watched for 1h 30 mins. It really is a shame because this movie is really really good. It has great performances, a decent plot and the music is great. The movie is really enjoyable, and the idea of a movie that is more like a TV series, where the writer is trying to write something interesting and more interesting, is really great. This movie deserves a better rating and it should've been released much earlier than it was.

Amy photo
Amy

I was curious to see this movie because I am a fan of 'The Wrestler' and this movie had its own story of a former pro wrestler who is now in prison. There were a few things that confused me. First, a man named "Ray' was the main character of the movie. I was just hoping to see a different name. I also found the actors in the movie to be a little annoying. It's hard to get on their level when they are really just being actors. I was really looking forward to seeing the movie because I really liked the concept. I liked the idea of the movie but it was too long. It seemed to drag on and on. I wanted to see more wrestling scenes. It was supposed to be a little different than what I had seen before. I was hoping for more. I was also hoping that the movie would actually be a good film. It had potential. It was enjoyable, but not amazing. I would recommend this movie to people who enjoy movies with wrestling in them. I would give this movie a 7 out of 10.