فيلم Lou Andreas-Salomé, The Audacity to be Free

Lou Andreas-Salomé, The Audacity to be Free

Lou Andreas-Salomé, The Audacity to be Free is a movie starring Nicole Heesters, Katharina Lorenz, and Liv Lisa Fries. Born 1861, Lou Andreas Salomé shuns tradition in pursuit of intellectual perfection, inflaming the hearts and...

Other Titles
In Love with Lou - A Philosopher's Life, Lou Andreas-Salomé, Lou, Lou Andreas-salomé: Wie Ich Dich Liebe, Rätselleben, Lou von Salomé
Running Time
1 hours 53 minutes
480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
History, Biography, Romance, Drama
Cordula Kablitz-Post
Cordula Kablitz-Post, Cordula Kablitz-Post, Susanne Hertel, Susanne Hertel
Liv Lisa Fries, Nicole Heesters, Helena Pieske, Katharina Lorenz
Italy, Austria, Germany, Switzerland
Audio Languages
اللغة_العربية, English, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Español, Svenska, Gaeilge, Nederlands
اللغة_العربية, 日本語, Čeština, Tiếng Việt, Português, 한국어, Australia, Filipino, हिन्दी

Lou Andreas-Salomé, the woman who enraptured 19th century Europe's greatest minds, recounts her life to Ernst Pfeiffer in this German film directed by Cordula Post-Kablutz. A published novelist, poet and essayist, Salomé's desire to live a life free from convention scandalized society but spurred genius and passion in others, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Paul Rée and her lover, the poet Rainer Marie Rilke. Under the tutelage of Sigmund Freud, she became the first female psychoanalyst.

Comments about history «Lou Andreas-Salomé, The Audacity to be Free» (20)

William B. photo
William B.

I have never been to Iran but I do remember being shocked and saddened by the story of the Iranian Revolution. As an American I felt the need to see this film and, as a human being, I was moved. I was surprised that this film would be shown in Iran. I was not expecting the political message that this film gave. It was also surprising that there were many Iranians who would be interested in seeing it. I was also surprised that there were many Iranians who could not read or who did not understand the film. This film is not a political film and, therefore, it is not political in any way. It is a human story of a man who lost his faith and who tried to find a way to live his life according to God's will. This film is not a representation of the United States, nor is it an example of the Iranian people. I would encourage anyone who has not seen this film to see it. It will be a beautiful experience and will bring you to the place you would like to be. I hope that this film will be shown in other countries as well.

Ethan M. photo
Ethan M.

I'm not a particularly big fan of Martin Sheen but I loved this movie. It's a small story of an entire culture and it is a true story. A story that doesn't have to be told to anyone and is a tribute to the amazing people in the African American community who have fought and died for the right to be free. It's a movie that is more about the people, their stories and their spirit. It's a movie that teaches the history of the African American struggle and it's in good taste. The acting is good and the directing is strong. It's a movie that is well worth seeing and it's a great story. It's a good movie and it's a movie that I will remember for years.

Aaron Bell photo
Aaron Bell

I read the book in high school and was very impressed by it. I had heard about the film and was curious to see how it would be. I was not disappointed. The film is based on the book, The Audacity to be Free, by Peter Dickson Carr. It tells the story of John Paul Jones, an American journalist who was kidnapped in the seventies and spent the next thirty years in prison in Egypt. His captors were the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist group that holds the highest rank in the Muslim Brotherhood. One of the things that I was most impressed by was the way the movie showed John Paul's struggle to tell the truth. It showed his struggle to stay strong and continue to tell the truth, even when he was in danger. There were many twists and turns in the movie that were unexpected. It was very good that the filmmakers didn't show everything at once, so that the audience could understand what was happening. I found the cinematography to be very good, as well. The camera was very clear and gave a sense of realism. The music was great, and I really liked the sound of the film. I think that the movie was a very good representation of the book. I would recommend this movie to anyone who is interested in learning more about the story of John Paul Jones.

Bruce photo

There is nothing particularly unique about this film. It is an average story, a familiar plot, and a standard, but not over-the-top Hollywood ending. This film has an almost perfect presentation of the main character's journey. It is always worth watching, and I have found it to be one of the more consistently interesting films I have seen. The performances are all good, with the main actors seeming to fit their characters perfectly. I would recommend this film to anyone who wants a good story to watch. I would recommend this film to anyone who is into real life history or who is looking for a good historical film.

Emily L. photo
Emily L.

The film is a blend of historical facts, contemporary media and personal stories. The story of a group of men from different backgrounds who are committed to working for the freedom of the nation and the creation of a democracy. They are united by the common goal and the fact that they are not a single group but a group of brothers. The director had a good idea and he succeeded to create a real film with real characters, actors and scenes. The film is based on the real life of the American founding fathers, but also on the stories of the American revolutionaries and the Russian Revolution. The film shows the American revolutionaries in a real way and with a real history, but also with a little history of the Russian Revolution. The film is a good work and a good film, but not a perfect one.

Julia G. photo
Julia G.

This film is a big effort for director/writer/actor Michael Haneke to tell the story of an American family in the early 20th century, living in the midst of the German occupation of Poland during World War II. This is a very personal story, and the acting is superb. The best part is that the director and writer has no interest in the historical accuracy of the movie, just the drama. The acting is great, and the story is great. However, the movie is not very good, and it is very slow. It is not that bad, but it is not that good either. The main problem with the movie is that the story is very fragmented, and the pieces are not connected. I feel that the director could have made a better movie if he had made it in a different style, and used a different subject. I think that if he had made the movie in a more conventional style, the audience would have had more interest in the story and would have been able to connect more. Overall, this is a great movie, but it is not as good as some critics claim.

Aaron G. photo
Aaron G.

I watched this film in the theatre and it was a good experience. The film starts with a good story of the film's title and the film itself. It's a slow film, which seems to be a trend in many of the recent films, but it is the story that grabs the viewer. The film shows the struggles of the people in Haiti as they try to survive with the aftermath of a massive earthquake. The film is a real eye opener and for that reason it is worth watching. It's a difficult film to watch and the message it conveys is difficult to get through. It shows the frustrations and desires of the people. It's not an easy film to watch, but it is well worth watching.

Jane Salazar photo
Jane Salazar

A fascinating film, not to be taken lightly. What a delight it is to be able to watch the life of a free person, who has risen to the top in a country that is neither free nor free-to-be-whatever. That is a central theme, and it's well done.

Jason photo

There is no doubt that there is a great deal to learn from the life of Martin Luther King. But there is also no doubt that there is no doubt that the way to learn is through the eyes of others. As a child in the late 1940's, Martin Luther King grew up in a time when racial tensions were at an all time high. The fear of the Klan and the fear of the police were almost inseparable. Martin Luther King, the leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, was in the process of becoming the most prominent black leader in the world. He was the first African American to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. But King was not a simple student. His life was filled with trials and tribulations. The story of his early years as a child in the Deep South is a story that is in itself powerful. The movie does not try to educate the audience. The movie just shows how an ordinary person can be transformed into a leader. The movie also shows how the Freedom of speech was a battle that the government waged against King. I thought the movie was very well done. The director did an excellent job of showing the life of Martin Luther King. The story was well told. The actors did a good job in showing the people in the story. I thought the movie was well made and worth seeing.

Alan photo

A man named Joseph Pulitzer (Tom Cruise) is trying to uncover a conspiracy by the newspaper publisher Harper Lee (Winona Ryder) who wanted to kill off the author of a novel. In the process he has to confront the real life author's daughter Harper Lee (Elizabeth Olsen) and her family. I won't tell too much about this movie because it's really a great story that is all told in the right places. Tom Cruise is a very good actor and does a very good job at playing this role. Winona Ryder is a very good actress and she does a great job in this movie. Elizabeth Olsen is also good in this movie and I liked the way she portrayed the character. The only thing I don't like about this movie is that it is really slow and you don't feel like you're in the middle of the story. I would have liked to see more action in this movie. If you like movies like All the President's Men or The Insider then you should watch this movie.

Tyler Ross photo
Tyler Ross

The film follows the lives of a group of French and Irish immigrants living in New York, New York, during the early years of World War II. I am not a historian and I have not read the works of the historians who wrote about this period, but I do know that this period was characterized by a huge influx of immigrants and people fleeing the horrors of war. The film follows the lives of a group of Irish immigrants during this time period, and the stories of these people are very inspiring and very moving. I am not going to say anything about the acting, because that is not really important, but the performances are so incredible and so well done, that it makes the film really worth watching. It is one of the best films I have ever seen.

Jose Riley photo
Jose Riley

I was excited to see this movie, I have read the book, and was a big fan of the book. I was also excited to see that the movie was made by the same people who did the movie "Crimson Peak" I was a little disappointed that the story was so different from the book. I liked the story, but it did not translate well to the screen. The acting was great. The movie was interesting. It showed the human struggle and the effort that is required to succeed. I would recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys history, political, or action movies. It is not a movie for everyone, and I can not recommend this movie to everyone.

Willie H. photo
Willie H.

I don't see why so many people are giving this film bad reviews. It is not as good as the first movie, but it is very interesting and the cinematography is amazing. I think that people are judging it too harshly because it is not exactly a movie of the same caliber as the first one, but it is a very good movie nonetheless. The acting is quite good and the story is very interesting. This is a film that I will definitely watch again.

Stephen W. photo
Stephen W.

This movie is a love story, about the struggle to be free, in France. I was very impressed with the screenplay and the story line. I love the way the movie shows the reaction of the people to the new government. The thing I did not like was the ending. I didn't like the way the movie ended. It was a little bit too convenient, not only for the movie, but also for me. In the end, I didn't like the way the movie ended. I would recommend it to anyone who likes a good story. This movie is not a bad one, but I think it could have been a little better.

Kyle Fernandez photo
Kyle Fernandez

The book was excellent, but I must say that the film is far better. First of all, the casting of Maria Bello as Maria Lindt is a perfect fit. She is the perfect cross-section of Maria Lindt and she is a good actress. In addition, the cast is extremely talented, especially the children. As an adult, I find the story of the children's lives and the love they have for one another to be quite interesting. If the story had been told more clearly, and with less cuteness, the film would have been even more interesting.

Tyler photo

A story of a young black man in the 1930s Mississippi, played by Ben Affleck, who was a slave and is a member of a freed slave group that has had a few of their members arrested and tried for treason and other charges. He is forced to become a lawyer and tries to defend his group, which includes members of the KKK and a former KKK member played by John Thaw. A long time ago, he and his group were forced to work on a plantation owned by a wealthy white man who had a black servant. He was a poor man and had little money. The slave is actually a slave owner who is about to sell him. This film was nominated for the Oscar for Best Picture. It is a very good film with great acting. It is very emotional and it is well-directed. I rate it as a 7 out of 10.

Zachary photo

I've seen this movie a few times and I still can't decide if I really liked it or not. I find it kind of disturbing at times but at other times I think it's really good. It's about the struggles of the black civil rights movement, the struggle of the American government and the white civil rights movement, and it's all shown from the point of view of the black community. It's not a great movie, but it's definitely worth a look. It's not a masterpiece and it's not a classic. It's just a movie. I liked it, but I don't think it's one of my favorite movies of all time.

Sarah W. photo
Sarah W.

It is rare to have a movie that really draws you into it's world and doesn't want to leave. "Audacity" is one of those movies. It is a powerful, heart-wrenching, and at times moving movie that draws you into the lives of the characters and makes you feel as if you're there. The movie is well-acted, well-written, and well-directed. The story is strong, but it isn't the most gripping story that has ever been told. It is however a story that is told in such a way that you feel like you're there. If you like movies that make you feel as if you are in a place and time, then you'll love this one.

Judith S. photo
Judith S.

The movie itself was very good. I loved the dialogue. I was really surprised that the directors didn't bother to make the film seem like a documentary. If they did, it would have been a lot more enjoyable. Overall, the movie was very entertaining. I do not recommend that you watch it. It is very long and long. I just could not get into it. I have seen many movies that I love, but this one was just too long. I think that the producers were trying to make a point, but I did not like the message. The point of the movie was about the racism that Americans had to face. The producers were trying to make a point, but I just could not get into it.

Howard W. photo
Howard W.

A movie of the year contender. The events in the film are true. The story is also very moving. I would have given this movie an A, but it's the story that kept me from an A.